Is Saddam right? - Devils Advocate.

[Psychotron]

obviously down.The floors collapsed, they shouldnt have. The weight from the top which was each floor was already supporting should not have caused such events to occur. The floor below the compromised floor would also have had to be compromised in order for each to give out, it doesnt work with just one floor being crippled.

[RA]

Like Johan said, you know this because you know more then all the experts?

obviously down.The floors collapsed, they shouldnt have. The weight from the top which was each floor was already supporting should not have caused such events to occur. The floor below the compromised floor would also have had to be compromised in order for each to give out, it doesnt work with just one floor being crippled.

[Psychotron]

Like Johan said, you know this because you know more then all the experts?

Because I have read and listened to what experts have said. There is a lot of skepticism, and I will follow suit with Johan and say that it is futile for me to argue with you guys. It really doesnt matter whether or not the planes crash was the cause of the fall. It is probably the weakest argument for why the whole thing was fishy.

[Phreak101]

Because I have read and listened to what experts have said. There is a lot of skepticism, and I will follow suit with Johan and say that it is futile for me to argue with you guys. It really doesnt matter whether or not the planes crash was the cause of the fall. It is probably the weakest argument for why the whole thing was fishy.

You're ice skatin uphill bro. Just because you've watched Loose Change and think that all the evidence is there does not mean that what you're hearing is the truth.

When a panel of close to 100 structural engineers releases a report stating exactly what happened that coincides with what we think happened, I'm convinced.

[Kärnfysikern]

obviously down.The floors collapsed, they shouldnt have. The weight from the top which was each floor was already supporting should not have caused such events to occur. The floor below the compromised floor would also have had to be compromised in order for each to give out, it doesnt work with just one floor being crippled.

Hasnt it been conclusivly shown that the structure was weakened enough for the collaps to take place. Atleast conclusive enough to convince everyone investigating it...

But if one floor is crippled and gives in the rest will fall. They are not built to withstand 10 floors coming crashing down. Only to withstand the static weight of the floors above.

Anyway lets not get into a discussion about this. It has been beaten to death in several threads and I might add that on the science forums I browse the topic is even closed for discussion since everyone with credability agress with the official story and has debunked the myths enough times to be feed up with it. So I do not have any expertise to say anything myself but I trust the scientific consensus on this issue.

Also the fact that the man that designed the towers himself do not find any objections makes me belive nothing fishy happened.