I'm sure you will recall the many references made to zoologists who have documented how many species exhibit a small % of homosexual behaviour. From that, it is reasonable to assume that if it happens in animals from penguins to primates, it wouldn't be unreasonable to expect it in humans. A normal representation of homosexual behaviour in other species is about 3% to 5%. It's about that in humans. Aberrant behaviour? Nope. Alarming? Sure, to people wedded to antiquated notions about sexuality.
The definition abberant behavior is relative, and is constantly evolving. As I said, homosexuality is becoming viewed as less abberant. But let's not pretend that 3% of the population is not abberant........Abberant or not, this behavior is becoming more widely accepted, to an extent.
. . . what does bestiality have to do with this? I hope you're not trying to make some sort of reference that gays are akin to animal abusers, because they are not . . .
I started my example with beastiality, your the one that added homosexuality to the mix.
Sure, that's an apt description of Mr. Olympia. Or of many dedicated bodybuilders, which make up perhaps .0001% of the world's population. Yes?
Mr olympia? How did we go from bodybuilding to Mr olympia?
By the way, were you homeschooled?
