Results 1 to 22 of 22

Thread: ONE OF OUR QUINTESSENTIAL Q'S: Do some steroids literally “burn fat”?

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    1,446
    Let us also not forget Masteron. WHich not only burns fat, but has its own Anti-E affects.

    I think this whole "doesn't burn fat" was started to prevent fat asses from using gear when they are not ready for gear as a fast easy cure all to their own slob-like lazy ass behaivor and eating habits.

    But you are definately on point with your post. Even as dangerous as it may be to post that openly.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    1,357
    Quote Originally Posted by kynetguy
    Let us also not forget Masteron. WHich not only burns fat, but has its own Anti-E affects.

    I think this whole "doesn't burn fat" was started to prevent fat asses from using gear when they are not ready for gear as a fast easy cure all to their own slob-like lazy ass behaivor and eating habits.

    But you are definately on point with your post. Even as dangerous as it may be to post that openly.
    Yeah, Masteron definitely.

    I also agree that the reason, many don't advocate steroid's ability to promote fat loss is because of all the lazy people that would use them as a crutch.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    1,446
    Quote Originally Posted by Titleist
    Yeah, Masteron definitely.

    I also agree that the reason, many don't advocate steroid's ability to promote fat loss is because of all the lazy people that would use them as a crutch.
    Man, I have to laugh everytime I see our avatar. It just reminds me of Vanilla Ice back in the day. . .LOL

    The hair you gave yourself I guess.

    Were you his double in "Cool as Ice?"

    Just messing with you bro. Looking quite lean there too BTW

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Omnipresent
    Posts
    6,315
    Quote Originally Posted by kynetguy
    Let us also not forget Masteron. WHich not only burns fat, but has its own Anti-E affects.

    I think this whole "doesn't burn fat" was started to prevent fat asses from using gear when they are not ready for gear as a fast easy cure all to their own slob-like lazy ass behaivor and eating habits.

    But you are definately on point with your post. Even as dangerous as it may be to post that openly.
    I can only truly vouch for Var as the clinical studies consistently use and authenticate its fat burning properties. Although the reputations of Tren and Mast are substantial leaving me no reason to doubt them, to my knowledge neither is run in research studies and thus not clinically confirmed.

    True, and I acquiesced to the reasoning behind this falsehood, however it's still better to be honest.

    As for the dangers of posting in defense of TRUTH, well my only regret is that I have but one life to give for my forum!
    - Nathan Hale (loosely paraphrased)

    M.
    Last edited by magic32; 06-25-2007 at 08:54 AM.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    1,446
    Quote Originally Posted by magic32
    Point taken, Mast is certainly a member of this category, but I most often hear such propaganda in reference to Var and Tren.

    True, and I acquiesced to the reasoning behind this falsehood, however it's still better to be honest.

    As for the dangers of posting in defense of TRUTH, well my only regret is that I have but one life to give for my forum!
    - Nathan Hale (loosely paraphrased)

    M.
    I totally agree about the truth aspect. You will never find a post by me where I disagree with the fat burning properties of said gear. (I know you never said I said otherwise, just making a statement)

    Everyone wants to say you can cut with anything or you can bulk with anything, its all diet. While there is a lot of truth to that, you can still cut BETTER with some things than others.

    Now obviously to see the fat burning effects of tren, mast, or var, your diet does need to be pretty much on point. You can't be eating banana splits 3 tims a week crying that you aren't burning fat,

    But the bottom line is this. Reguardless of which gear burns fat the most, it should not be used as a crutch by 30% body fat novices to get leaner. The sides of gear in people who are not physically, mentally and dietarily ready for it are far worse. Your body much be in a proper state of well being to SAFELY use gear.

  6. #6
    Quote Originally Posted by magic32
    I can only truly vouch for Var as the clinical studies consistently use and authenticate its fat burning properties. Although the reputations of Tren and Mast are substantial leaving me no reason to doubt them, to my knowledge neither is run in research studies and thus not clinically confirmed.

    M.
    We can't deduce that they burn fat but we can induce it. For example, androgen receptor binding strength has been found to be lipolytic proportionate to that strength, and we know that tren binds very tightly to the androgen receptor. I think I referenced that in the Tren Profile.

    As for masteron, all we really have is anecdotal evidence.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    1,446
    Quote Originally Posted by Anthony Roberts
    We can't deduce that they burn fat but we can induce it. For example, androgen receptor binding strength has been found to be lipolytic proportionate to that strength, and we know that tren binds very tightly to the androgen receptor. I think I referenced that in the Tren Profile.

    As for masteron, all we really have is anecdotal evidence.
    . . .and your masteron profile

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •