The first clip, is in reference to Bill Maher (douche bag w/huge head) who said he wished Cheney would have been killed in a terrorist attack. Maher took no slack from anyone about this comment. Now she's showing the irony of an assanine comment on the other side of the political isle.
The second clip is in reference to a guy on the Grey's Anatomy show who called someone a f-----t and then had to go to rehab to keep his job and win back respect of those he offended.
Didn't watch the other clips.
Last edited by Huckster; 06-27-2007 at 08:51 PM.
I've never paid any attention to her, but from what I understand, she's a bit of a troll:
-----------------------------
(from http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...0501610_2.html)
Asked if she would use a racial slur in a joke, Coulter said it was "semantic totalitarianism to compare everything to the N-word."
The author of such books as "Godless," "Treason" and "Slander," Coulter is known for pushing the boundaries of acceptable discourse. She was widely condemned last year when she called a politically active group of 9/11 widows "witches," saying: "I've never seen people enjoying their husbands' deaths so much. . . . And by the way, how do we know their husbands weren't planning to divorce these harpies?"
In 2004, USA Today dropped Coulter as a convention columnist when she derided "the corn-fed, no make-up, natural fiber, no-bra needing, sandal-wearing, hirsute, somewhat fragrant hippie chick pie wagons they call 'women' at the Democratic National Convention."
National Review dropped Coulter's column in 2001 when she wrote after the Sept. 11 attacks: "We should invade their countries, kill their leaders and convert them to Christianity." She responded by calling the magazine's editors "girly-boys."
-----------------------------------------
Seems to me that she's using her potty-mouth to make a buck.
I suppose some people go for that sort of thing . . . can't say that I'm one of them . . .
Haha. Good ol' turkey neck. She's always good for a couple laughs. Who says things like that?!![]()
Originally Posted by Huckster
I shouldnt be surprised that these clips were taken out of context.
Shes no worse than Michael Moore.
One thing I have to say about you conservatives Roid, you stick together no matter how assinine! LOL!!!Originally Posted by roidattack
Originally Posted by BgMc31
Funny, thats how Ive always viewed dems![]()
Huckster I like you more and more with each post, keep up the good post.Originally Posted by Huckster
I suppose in your opinion, Rosie and Michael Moore are mental giants. Ann just beats the Libs at the own game. The game of personal attack.Originally Posted by BgMc31
I love ann... For once a Conservative doesn't hold back what they think and everyone cries about it.
Of course the liberal mdeia is going to blow everything out of proportion. It's funny how many people start believing everything they watch on the news.
Of course, again Logan, you suppose wrong! Never have you seen me come to the defense of Rosie or Moore. Please provide proof of you assumption.
Linksys 2400... nevermind! No need to get into an argument with someone who makes up things (ie Bell Curve and Contact theory) to prove his point.
Here's Rosie with her stupid assumptions, bgMc31
O'DONNELL: Wait, can I just say something? Why do people enlist in the Army?
RICKI LAKE: To get an education, and they're poor-
O'DONNELL: Thank you.
LAKE: -and that's the only way to get one.
O'DONNELL: The vast majority- Yes, Elisabeth. It's true!
According to a recent study by the Heritage Foundation, military enlistees are "better educated, wealthier, and more rural on average than their civilian peers." Additionally, "recruits have a higher percentage of high school and college graduates" and "the distribution of household income of recruits is noticably higher than the entire youth population."
HASSELBECK: First of all, in the past year, the testing scores of our armed services have been higher than ever, so the education level-
O'DONNELL: You are wrong. We have more convicted felons in the Army because we're allowing them to get through.
HASSELBECK: So they're awful. They're awful then.
O'DONNELL: Elisabeth, I do everything I can to support the troops financially and emotionally. I love them as much as you do. I'm as much of a patriot. I want them home
Originally Posted by BgMc31
So what's your view, BgMc31? Anti-war? Do you believe we're just a bunch of neo-conservative pigs that caused 9/11 ourselves? Just curious....
She's pretty, that sells. But if you are watching Fox News anyway I doubt she'd be telling you anything that you didn't agree with.
Nor have I seen you speak out against them.Originally Posted by BgMc31
Again, why do you all try to bring up Rosie? I've never defended Rosie.Originally Posted by linksys240O
Yes I am against the war in Iraq simply because of the reasoning that we rushed into it. It was a needless war in my opinion that had nothing to do with 9/11.Originally Posted by linksys240O
Logan, I have spoken about the stupid statements Rosie has made. How does bringing up Rosie and Moore justify the stuff Coulture has done. Two wrongs don't make a right. So don't attempt to diminish my statements by attempting to align me with Rosie or Moore when there is no evidence that I support them or their statements.
[QUOTE=BgMc31]Yes I am against the war in Iraq simply because of the reasoning that we rushed into it. It was a needless war in my opinion that had nothing to do with 9/11.QUOTE]
BcMc31, I can see you're just as ignorant as all the other libs. I must of missed you when you were serving over in Iraq....I mean, you surely wouldn't call it a "needless war" unless you have been there yourself to form your own opinions, right?
My friend of 6 years died by my side by some moron that would kill you and your family if he had the chance. I received the honor of escorting his remains back to his hometown, and giving the American flag to his wife and 2 year old son. And yes, it was an honor! I have scrapnel stuck in my right calf and I have chronic back ache from being thrown 30 yards from an IED. DO NOT tell me this is a needless war.
We have two choices; fight the terrorists on their turf, or let them come back to America and create another 9/11.
[QUOTE=linksys240O]Wah, wah, wah...don't try to play that game with me Linksys! Being called ignorant by a confirmed racist is laughable. I respect that fact that you served in Iraq, and you're right I haven't. But I know several who have (including my sister who is there currently). Plus my father served 30yrs in the Army and served in Vietnam (2 tours), Beirut, Panama, Dominican Republic, and the first Persian Gulf war. I am the godfather to Shoshana Johnson's first child (one of the first POW's of this conflict). So I know soldiers and have spoken with many quite extensively and many feel the same way I do. Now stop being an idiot and claim that being against the war is being against the soldiers. That's some bullshite political spin.Originally Posted by BgMc31
Please provide proof that the evidence we used to invade was true. Our presence in Iraq has caused an increase in recruiting for terrorist, that's a fact. I'm not going to get into a pissing match about the war in Iraq with you Link. The topic of the Iraq war has been debated to death on this forum. If you wish to further debate me on the issue of the Iraq war, please feel free to PM me.
Let's get back to the orginal topic of this thread.
[QUOTE=BgMc31]I see that linksys240O has been suspended again. I certainly hope that it was not because he called you ignorant Bg. You and I have used that term toward each other in the past, and IMO, calling someone a racist is far worse.Originally Posted by linksys240O
Why is calling someone a racist when it's true, wrong? His erroneous post about the Bell Curve and Contact Theory were both blatantly racist and both were untrue. So how is that wrong, Logan? If it walks like a duck...
I do agree that if he was suspended for calling someone ignorant is not fair.
Last edited by BgMc31; 06-29-2007 at 12:09 PM.
Originally Posted by BgMc31
No, it was more than that.
[QUOTE=Logan13]Originally Posted by BgMc31
From the looks of where the whole thing was going in the last few posts, I'd guess the words got a little more offensive than that.
Originally Posted by roidattack
We can do this 'banned' thing all day long. Please tell me what warranted my banning in this instance? Are people not allowed to give their opinions if it's outside the norm? If you don't like something that someone says then you ban them? What a chicken sht way out...
If you want to ban people then you need to revise your 'forum rules' section. I've seen people who contribute a lot to this site who are banned for some pretty idiotic reasons.
You are banned for having multiple user accounts. If you return we will continue banning you or we will ban your entire ISP. You are not welcome here. Find some another board to post.Originally Posted by llnksys2400
Originally Posted by roidattack
He is banned for other reasons. If you see him post please click the report button so he can be banned again.Originally Posted by Logan13
Thank you
[QUOTE=BgMc31]a real soilder wont comment on the war if he has been threw it, believe meOriginally Posted by linksys240O
u dont talk about it, as soon as we win the heart and minds of the iraqs this war will be over, bottomline are you proud of our soilders thats all that should be commented about not being against the war,7 out of 10 army soilders wont even seen combat over there,the ones that have seen the gates of hell cant talk about it and ask for gods forgiveness everyday, respect our fallen soilders. If you could tell a fallen soilder that your not for them, then your not with them, u would agree.
Hooa!!!!!!!!!!!!!! RANGERS LEAD THE WAY.
I always see this line that "we have to fight them there or we will have to fight them here" which is non-sense because theiraqi nationalist guerilla-fighters fighting the US there are not the same people as the saudi-arabian sabatuers that do a 9/11 type attack..and there are thousands of insurgents and an endless stream of new recruits for every one that is killed or captured..where it only takes a few sabatuers with a suitcase nuclear weapon to do another 9/11 type disaster..and the death toll over there is more than 600000 and counting not to mention the total destruction of the country and the physical and psycological damage it causes to the survivors and 2,000,000 persons expelled into neighboring countries..it clearly motivates more people over there to try to get some kind of a nuke and do a big attack..i mean a few car bombs in london is no big deal but the iraq war is destroying an entire country and it's people, 5 years of supporting the new iraqi govt is enough, time to go already!
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)