Quote Originally Posted by Kärnfysikern
I have to say that I am getting a bit fed up with the consensus argument even though I have myself used it in the past. If there is a consensus there is probably something going on. But science doesnt work by consensus. Either something is right or its wrong. It doesnt matter what scientists belive. It it cant be proven right more work needs to be done. If someone can make a climate modell that accounts for cloud formation and that can reproduce the climate of the last 100 years without 19 fudge factors then Im sure no one would have any objections anymore.

The whole global warming thing is becoming to politicized. Science works best when nobody is interfering, especialy not politicians. The attempts to smear Svensmark and Lomborg for instance is disgusting.

Tax the shit out of Pollutants that we know are harmfull and co2 will automaticly go down. Problem solved. Pollutants kill hundrads of thousands now, GW might kill in 50 years. Coal is shit, oil is shit, it doesnt take GW to realise that.
Point is that it is only a theory. Those who so quickly embrace this theory are the same ones' who embraced the Global Cooling theory as well. I find it strange that some are so willing to believe in such theories, even when there is legitimate arguments against it. These are the same people who will never affirm world terrorist intelligence, since it was wrong once......just as wrong as the Global Cooling theory was. It is political.