I know where people are getting the D-bol only cycles are Ok from!!

[Papa Smurf]

Hey Nine! Does this dumbass even metion PCT for his Dbol cycle. I think my Dbol cycle when I was WAY to young, and no PCT is what brought me to the term TRT for LIFE!!!!!!!!

[ninesecz]

Hey Nine! Does this dumbass even metion PCT for his Dbol cycle. I think my Dbol cycle when I was WAY to young, and no PCT is what brought me to the term TRT for LIFE!!!!!!!!

Everything it said is written in the OP and no I do not see anything about it. He says to run Tamox Citrate but not after the cycle is over

[WLlewellyn]

Good morning fellas,

I read what some of you are saying, and can appreciate your concerns. However, I do want to reiterate that I had when I wrote that, and still do, believe that there is nothing “wrong” with running a cycle without testosterone. Here are a few points to consider:

1) From the 1960 through the 1980’s, if you were an athlete, the first cycle you took was probably Dianabol (methandrostenolone) @ 2-5 tabs/day. Dianabol was the introduction most players had to steroids. This drug worked extremely well, and arguably changed the face of sports. Neither steroids nor human physiology has changed since.

2) Methandrostenolone is moderately androgenic/estrogenic. In a sufficient dose it is usually more than enough to maintain libido, energy, and sense of wellness.

3) Many people, especially those new to AAS, refuse to inject themselves. For these people, a cycle of dbol or Anadrol may be the most effective options they have.

All strong steroids are also strong suppressors of the HPTA. Testosterone maintains libido so well because it is the primary male androgen/estrogen source. If you have libido issues, adding testosterone to a cycle will usually correct them. The balance of anabolic activity to side effects (health specific) w/testosterone is also better than just about anything. But this should not be mistaken for this hormone being a necessity. Many AAS work very well on their own. Your mileage may vary, of course.


And just to correct one other thing. I am a very strong supporter of PCT, and the sections before and after the sample cycles in ANABOLICS both detail the need for PCT. The PoWeR program using HCG+Clo+Nolv is highlighted in the book.

[JiGGaMaN]

Good morning fellas,

I read what some of you are saying, and can appreciate your concerns. However, I do want to reiterate that I had when I wrote that, and still do, believe that there is nothing “wrong” with running a cycle without testosterone. Here are a few points to consider:

1) From the 1960 through the 1980’s, if you were an athlete, the first cycle you took was probably Dianabol (methandrostenolone) @ 2-5 tabs/day. Dianabol was the introduction most players had to steroids. This drug worked extremely well, and arguably changed the face of sports. Neither steroids nor human physiology has changed since.

the problem is, things did change. things changed in a HUGE way: we have access to many more compounds and understand their role in bodybuilding more clearly. imagine if doctors were prescribing using only drugs found from the 60's...

[WLlewellyn]

Good morning fellas,

I read what some of you are saying, and can appreciate your concerns. However, I do want to reiterate that I had when I wrote that, and still do, believe that there is nothing “wrong” with running a cycle without testosterone. Here are a few points to consider:

1) From the 1960 through the 1980’s, if you were an athlete, the first cycle you took was probably Dianabol (methandrostenolone) @ 2-5 tabs/day. Dianabol was the introduction most players had to steroids. This drug worked extremely well, and arguably changed the face of sports. Neither steroids nor human physiology has changed since.

2) Methandrostenolone is moderately androgenic/estrogenic. In a sufficient dose it is usually more than enough to maintain libido, energy, and sense of wellness.

3) Many people, especially those new to AAS, refuse to inject themselves. For these people, a cycle of dbol or Anadrol may be the most effective options they have.

All strong steroids are also strong suppressors of the HPTA. Testosterone maintains libido so well because it is the primary male androgen/estrogen source. If you have libido issues, adding testosterone to a cycle will usually correct them. The balance of anabolic activity to side effects (health specific) w/testosterone is also better than just about anything. But this should not be mistaken for this hormone being a necessity. Many AAS work very well on their own. Your mileage may vary, of course.


And just to correct one other thing. I am a very strong supporter of PCT, and the sections before and after the sample cycles in ANABOLICS both detail the need for PCT. The PoWeR program using HCG+Clo+Nolv is highlighted in the book.

[CHAP]

Good morning fellas,

I read what some of you are saying, and can appreciate your concerns. However, I do want to reiterate that I had when I wrote that, and still do, believe that there is nothing “wrong” with running a cycle without testosterone. Here are a few points to consider:

1) From the 1960 through the 1980’s, if you were an athlete, the first cycle you took was probably Dianabol (methandrostenolone) @ 2-5 tabs/day. Dianabol was the introduction most players had to steroids. This drug worked extremely well, and arguably changed the face of sports. Neither steroids nor human physiology has changed since.

2) Methandrostenolone is moderately androgenic/estrogenic. In a sufficient dose it is usually more than enough to maintain libido, energy, and sense of wellness.

3) Many people, especially those new to AAS, refuse to inject themselves. For these people, a cycle of dbol or Anadrol may be the most effective options they have.

All strong steroids are also strong suppressors of the HPTA. Testosterone maintains libido so well because it is the primary male androgen/estrogen source. If you have libido issues, adding testosterone to a cycle will usually correct them. The balance of anabolic activity to side effects (health specific) w/testosterone is also better than just about anything. But this should not be mistaken for this hormone being a necessity. Many AAS work very well on their own. Your mileage may vary, of course.


And just to correct one other thing. I am a very strong supporter of PCT, and the sections before and after the sample cycles in ANABOLICS both detail the need for PCT. The PoWeR program using HCG+Clo+Nolv is highlighted in the book.

I,m a believer in your books and appreciate what you do for us all But I have some things I would love to talk to you about only in PM if you have the time. I know that you are a busy man.

[Undercover]

Good morning fellas,

I read what some of you are saying, and can appreciate your concerns. However, I do want to reiterate that I had when I wrote that, and still do, believe that there is nothing “wrong” with running a cycle without testosterone. Here are a few points to consider:

1) From the 1960 through the 1980’s, if you were an athlete, the first cycle you took was probably Dianabol (methandrostenolone) @ 2-5 tabs/day. Dianabol was the introduction most players had to steroids. This drug worked extremely well, and arguably changed the face of sports. Neither steroids nor human physiology has changed since. We should learn from our mistakes. It's 2009 man.

2) Methandrostenolone is moderately androgenic/estrogenic. In a sufficient dose it is usually more than enough to maintain libido, energy, and sense of wellness.

3) Many people, especially those new to AAS, refuse to inject themselves. For these people, a cycle of dbol or Anadrol may be the most effective options they have. So they shouldn't be taking AAS anyway.

All strong steroids are also strong suppressors of the HPTA. Testosterone maintains libido so well because it is the primary male androgen/estrogen source. If you have libido issues, adding testosterone to a cycle will usually correct them. The balance of anabolic activity to side effects (health specific) w/testosterone is also better than just about anything. But this should not be mistaken for this hormone being a necessity. Many AAS work very well on their own. Your mileage may vary, of course. Why not? It sounds like a pretty good reason to me.


And just to correct one other thing. I am a very strong supporter of PCT, and the sections before and after the sample cycles in ANABOLICS both detail the need for PCT. The PoWeR program using HCG+Clo+Nolv is highlighted in the book.

just my 2 cents