I had a quick look at Deism on wikipedia and there are a few things that is similiar to absurdism.
I am glad you looked on wikipedia but i have a degree in theology and a doctor's degree in mathematics. So, the fact i studied the religions but believe in none of them and the fact i have a degree in math, should make you think i rely on only sciences!
Deism: is a religious and philosophical belief that a supreme being created the universe, and that this (and religious truth in general) can be determined using reason and observation of the natural world alone, without a need for either faith or organized religion. Deists tend to reject the notion of divine interventions in human affairs, such as by miracles and revelations, but not necessarily. These views contrast with a dependence on revelations, miracles, and faith found in many Judeo-Christian, Islamic and other theistic teachings. Deists typically reject most supernatural events (prophecy, miracles) and tend to assert that God (or "The Supreme Architect") has a plan for the universe that is not altered either by God intervening in the affairs of human life or by suspending the natural laws of the universe. What organized religions see as divine revelation and holy books, most deists see as interpretations made by other humans, rather than as authoritative sources. Deism became prominent in the 17th and 18th centuries during the Age of Enlightenment, especially in what is now the United Kingdom, France, United States and Ireland, mostly among those raised as Christians who found they could not believe in either a triune God, the divinity of Jesus, miracles, or the inerrancy of scriptures, but who did believe in one God. Initially it did not form any congregations, but in time deism strongly influenced other religious groups, such as Unitarianism and Universalism, which developed from it. It continues to this day in the forms of classical deism and modern deism.
So, wht's your problem with that! It is very clear and the fact you are bothered "for some reason", it is basically only your problem. Where do you find "absurdism"?
I am a deist who believes in no religion but I have a faith on a Supreme Being. I see no BIG DEAL on that!!!
Getting my head around one supreme being bothers me for some reason. I could accept other civilisations out there, who's level of technology makes us look like ants in comparison, but one being lording over everything? The Universe is enormous, it might even be finite but it is so big that
our minds cant comprehend it.
That's the point. Stop thinking with a human's mind, use it only for sciences but forget the rest. This is the reason why I believe in a Supreme Being without bothering myself trying to figure out the reason why... I have a faith and look for answers, relying on math, which can lead us to a better evolution in this dimension.How does one being watch over it all? Is he/she/it aware of 1 asteroid cruising through space, a small bird that is caught in mid-flight by an eagle? If you use the Rare Earth Hypothesis as the grounds that is how a planet with a breathable atmosphere could exist, there would be approximately 1 million earth like planets in our galaxy alone, and there are millions, billions of other galaxies. How does one being account for everything and why would such a being want a job like that?
Red Queen theory is apparant today. The strongest pass on their genes to their offspring, but so does everything else. Red Queen is a nod towards that everything evolves along so fast at the same time that if you looked around it would appear nothing moved. For example, if you took a Cheetah from 1 million years ago and put it in Africa today, it probably wouldnt be able to catch anything.
It's just a theory.
I think i said divergent evolution previously when I meant convergent evolution. An Echidna, Aardvark, Pangolin and a Numbat are all different types of animals and all live in different parts of the world, but they all share one similiar trait in that they have incredible sense of smell and often have long snouts. This concept is related to natural selection. Convergence is to meet and approach the same point from a different set of angles, so i'd be very interested to hear a different explanation for this evolutionary trait in those 5 animals.
I spoke abut human evolution, the animals are another thing and agree with you.
As for the Asteroid thing, yeah i've heard about that and I think it's entirely possible that is how our planet was seeded. I mean i've heard that when the earth was forming, that massive pressures and heat created secondary elements which would then go on to make other elements which would go on to make the first cyanobacterias. But it is still entirely possible that life started from an asteroid impact. Then comes the question, what is the asteroid? What was it a part of originally, and how did the organisms come to be on it in the first place?
If you know how an asteroid forms, you know also the answer.
Im sure its because the Media has told him its to protect himself from the burglar who's real intention is to rape and murder his entire family
