I didn't read the comments in this thread, because I'm on my mobile, but from the OP I will tell you that YES - from a psychological perspective steroids ARE addictive.
They are actually considered MORE addictive then Mary-J (sorry I will edit this out in 1 sec, if it's inappropriate). Mary-Jane is known to have about a 10% addiction rate. Steroids are considered a tad higher then this.
The next stages of drug / hormone addiction lead up to drugs such as meth, crack, etc.
If you look at the concept of addiction from a psychological perspective it is very possible that people can become addicted to steroids. To clarify, people become addicted to pharmacological drugs because of the drugs "potential for addiction" (which is essentially governed by how lipid soluble the particular drug is.... the higher the lipid solubility = the higher chances of tolerance aka addiction.)
Similarly, pharmacological drugs (mostly anything that is psychoactive, etc.) pass through the mesolimbic pathways of the brain, which is considered the "reward pathway" because it holds the dopaminergic pathways. Once this pathway becomes sensitized by a particular drug, you begin to experience cravings.
My thesis is in regards to this theory, is my belief that steroids may act in a similar fashion. Although steroids do not alter perception like pharmacological drugs, AAS are still hormones, and therefore once levels are unbalanced (not at homeostasis) there should be a mental rebound effect... which is conducive to addiction. (and which is why I believe steroid users eventually fall into repetitive patterns of use -- they fell inadequate when not on AAS, so they 'crave' their need for physical 'approval' -- [approval which is generally only in the users OWN mind!]
Hope that helped clear up your questions...
and sorry in advance to D7M lol
