awesome thread, just read through a good 30 pages and only am stopping to post this lol. so for my first cycle i am going to be running test prop for 8-10 weeks (i know your a big proponent of the longer cycles, slingshots, etc...but for my first cycle i just want to do a short and very basic cycle)
anyways, the only worries i have about cycling is the potential for gyno and acne. i know both of these are caused by uneven/fluctuating hormone levels (and genetics to some degree). with the prop i am going to be doing 75mg injects everyday, based on members experience and some graphs posted, the smaller and more frequent prop injects are the best bet for stable blood levels and minimal inject pain. but i am still trying to pin down what i should do for estro control on cycle. after reading through alot of your posts, i see you think that most people dont even need estro control drugs like adex/aromasin on cycle. to be honest i am more scared of the cancer drugs like adex, aromasin, nolva, clomid, etc than any steroid i ever plan on taking. would i be fine not taking an AI during my cycle but having say some adex and nolva on hand just in case i have some gyno or estro issues? i have proviron also and this seems to be another favored option...?
and as far as HCG, everyone has recommended running it during cycle to make pct much easier and quicker, that would also mean using much less SERM's which is very important to me. but i have seen two schools of thought on this, one is running HCG during cycle, discontinuing a few weeks before PCT, then using the typical SERM regimen. however i have also seen some people recommending using it through PCT because it does after all stimulate testicular function.
so im basically asking your for your opinion and guidance in helping me keep my estro in check on cycle to prevent gyno/acne but also not completely kill it so my gains suck, and also if it is possible to get away with using the least amount of SERM's possible?
thanks in advance man, and sorry for the lengthy read, just wanted to explain my concerns the best i could
since posting this i have read alot more and have simplified my above questions
if i am doing a 8-10 week cycle and planning on using HCG during PCT, would it be better to start HCG around week 1-2 or wait until week 4-5 after starting my cycle? (PCT would include HCG and nolva)(considering a slight test taper as well, trying to learn more about the pros/cons of that)
also, i was hoping you could clear some things up regarding the estro issues on cycle. if i am experiencing excessive acne/oily skin, then aromasin would be the ideal choice. but if acne/etc is not an issue but i am starting to see gyno flare up then nolva would be ideal because it would just target the breast tissue right? my hopes are that IF my balance is out of wack and i am getting sides, the aromasin will be able to balance things out...if not i will have to resort to some low dose accutane to keep my acne/oily skin in check (i have experience with acne drugs and if it gets bad, a low dose, 10mg ed of accutane is my only hope of not having a pizza facelol)
thanks man, after reading through about 40 pages you are one of the few guys whose opinion i really trust
i was just referring to it the sense that, if i have estro imbalance issues on cycle, the aromasin would be the best bet for control without overkill...and evening out the hormone levels should help control the acne. (a good member on here posted an article about how its not necessarily the high test that causes acne, its the fluxuation of levels, or having test/estro balance out of whack)
well a 10-12 week cycle will def shut me down, so based on what everyone has been telling me, HCG 200-250iu twice a week will help offset whatever little atrophy i might get, and make my PCT much easier. i would much rather use HCG during/post cycle if it would allow me to use less nolva for PCT. but since HCG does effect estrogen, would using it on cycle neccesitate aromasin, or again will that be on a "only if needed basis"? i was reading through alot of your past posts and you seem to be a big fan of using HCG over the SERM's to basically accomplish the same thing so i am very interested in that.
Last edited by sixey; 08-16-2010 at 08:10 PM.
ronnie...do you buy into muscle confusion.....switching to different exercises each time you lift?????why or why not??!!
fact or fiction..ronnie????
here be the quote from one of the vets magic "Sadly, what a lot of people don't realize is that it isn't aromatization or even the estro that incites gyno. This is why even while taking something as suppressive as Aromasin, a person can STILL get gyno. It also doesn't matter what's used as the combatant (preventive or post-gyno). All of these are myths that are perpetuated by parroted information throughout multiple forums and sites. Plus estro is estro, thus all these use Adex, Ldex, Mas, Nolva, Bromo, Caber people depending on your gear are also off.
The truth is that gyno is the product of the Test/Estro imbalance...period. Only this delicate ratio matters and when it’s altered, even a little, the individual becomes susceptible (obviously to varying degrees) regardless of the reason for imbalance or age (as even VERY little boys have acquired it), regardless of the increase be it elevated pure estro, or other ancillary-related estro-based hormones...prolac, proges, etc.
But if this is true, why do only some people get it while others never do? Good question.
Unfortunately genetics play a MAJOR factor, more specifically how sensitive an individual is to said imbalance which is based largely on their starting ratio. Because of this one person can acquire it at the start of single Test-only cycle; another for the first time after several years of complex stacks/cocktails and; yet another may never even experience minor symptoms. It really is a crap shoot, but the good news is that research shows that with proper tx, dosage and duration gyno at ANY STAGE and with ANY ORIGIN can be reversed...either completely in some, or very satisfactorily in others."
__________________
hmm, aromasin seems to be the AI of choice for most because it is easier on the lipids/etc...but if it is one of the stronger AI's and therefore = potentially less gains if you end up having to use it on cycle...would using low dose a-dex be a better idea?
its tough to get a solid answer, because there are two really solid backings for both aromasin and a-dex. so basically, if i was forced to run a low dose of an AI on cycle, which would be the ideal option?
There are currently 5 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 5 guests)