Boldenone

[Chuckdiesel]

Yes, RBC is Red Blood cell count.

Oxygen delivery is effected by high RBC because it thickens your blood, causing it to travel very sluggishly, so to speak, thus oxygen delivery slows down. With blood so thick, the heart goes into high gear to be able to pump it. Like any muscle, this puts stress on the heart. Of course there are mild to extreme cases of this. At any rate, it's enough for me to stay away from EQ.

Not to be contradictory here brother but an increase in rbc 's increases your blood's capability to carry oxygen to other parts of your body but in exchange for an increase of oxygen efficiency with more rbc's it does thicken your blood causing it to put more strain on your heart. In temporary cases, like using eq or epo, it will increase ones athletic performance but it is not a particular condition you want to use for extended periods of time.

[stpete]

Not to be contradictory here brother but an increase in rbc 's increases your blood's capability to carry oxygen to other parts of your body but in exchange for an increase of oxygen efficiency with more rbc's it does thicken your blood causing it to put more strain on your heart. In temporary cases, like using eq or epo, it will increase ones athletic performance but it is not a particular condition you want to use for extended periods of time.

Yes, chuck it's all about the oxygen. Likewise, smoking deprives your body of red blood cells. So, if you and i were practically identical in every way, but you smoked, i would more than likely benefit more. And in what you just said "in temporary cases will increase ones performance". Well, the problem w/that statement is "temporary". That's a relative term isn't it? Just like "extended periods of time". Right?

It's of my belief that those broad terms, and my experience w/said compound renders it useless. I don't like vague statements. Especially when i know firsthand otherwise.

Just my thoughts..

[Chuckdiesel]

Yes, chuck it's all about the oxygen. Likewise, smoking deprives your body of red blood cells. So, if you and i were practically identical in every way, but you smoked, i would more than likely benefit more. And in what you just said "in temporary cases will increase ones performance". Well, the problem w/that statement is "temporary". That's a relative term isn't it? Just like "extended periods of time". Right?

It's of my belief that those broad terms, and my experience w/said compound renders it useless. I don't like vague statements. Especially when i know firsthand otherwise.

Just my thoughts..

I totally get what you mean and the relativity between how such factors effects each person differently makes this compound a "trial and error" type drug. If the benefits far supersede the negatives, then it makes it worthwhile. Like your example on smoking. It effects people differently and what may harm you doesn't effect me in the least bit. Now let's remove the relativity behind the term temporary and call it a 12 week period. For 12 weeks one might incurred a higher rbc with a jacked blood pressure, but if your blood pressure were to return to baseline after cessation and you had benefited from the increased endurance, increased hunger, and huge strength gains, this compound would be totally worth it. I'm not trying to argue your point or beliefs why the compound is useless, cause you declare it's not worth it, but for others it might be suited well for them. I'm just against the point of others telling their opinion as fact and when asked about a certain compound, like boldenone, it's said it's a terrible drug, plain and simple. One might deduct it's something they want to completely avoid when in fact it may work very well for thm, as in my case. I'm not at all fighting or arguing anybody's methods, but a guiding hand stretches further than with knowledge and power than the hand that simply slaps you across the face and says no.