Quote Originally Posted by MuscleInk View Post
Lol.....common sense isn't common!

I agree with your suggestions, but I'd argue BW isn't done often enough and more likely among younger users who are self absorbed with the hopes for enhanced muscle mass.

EQ is still used, but I believe the majority of athletes in this industry would chose other more effective compounds. I've used EQ but prefer others. Like you said, personal choices, but when it comes down to value for dollar or ROI, I would spend my money on other agents.
Now I have to agree on all cylinders, lol.

1. Common sense isn't common.
2. Bloodwork is not performed to an appropriate scale, compared to the introduction of exogenous hormones.
3. Dollar for dollar, EQ is not a top performer.

I would never suggest EQ to someone who is financially looking to get the most bang for their buck, it is purely supplemental. However, if you've got the cash, and you want something to really push your cycle over the top, EQ is one of my first suggestions. Test P, Tren A, and EQ... they make my world go 'round.

Good post, bruh.