
Originally Posted by
Sgt. Hartman
So lets say cherry is right and these people have no social life, no sex or romance, and lack drive and ambition. I'm no psychologist but obviously they're doing these awful things to settle a vendetta and get even in life but also to gain attention and infamy and achieve in death what they couldnt in life, they think theyre getting what they deserved in their life although its post mortem. They can't be successful or recognized in life so they figure a way to do it through mass death.
So then the news media broadcasts their name and picture and life story all over the news for weeks if not more on end. Is it really necessary to release the name? Is it really necessary to release the picture and life story of these mentally disturbed people? I'm not sayin we should sweep the entire autrocity under the bus but to glorify the mentally challenged action is irrifvckingsponsible at best.
I'm a firm believer in our right to free speech but I don't give a fvck less if I ever know the shooters name or see his picture on the news. And the reason why is that there's some other psychopathic loser out there that's watching the news and thinking if he did that he would get the recognition he deserves, the respect he couldn't command in life, and the fame that would have never been possible other than because he committed an autrocity and now will become what he thought he deserves even though its post mortem. These degenerates getting a few solid weeks on every news channel is a huge victory and exponentially greater to them than what they accomplished and got credit for in life. They win!!
I'll go a step further and say that our media by publicizing and over reporting on these degenerates is actually encouraging others to follow in their footsteps. And I really believe that. If a unstable teen sees another get his picture on every news channel and his life story on CNN msnbc and fox then it gives him the formula for what he's wanted to achieve in life for so long. Copy the acts of johnny fruitcake and you'll be famous and popular and respected for at least a few weeks. They should be left anonymously dead to the general public so as the next nutcase sees no advantage in performing similar acts.
And don't get me started with all the other, but similar, issues our media has. Alll of a sudden Obama wants to ban all assault and semi automatic weapons. Really??? There's no bill been drafted yet and nothing's up for vote. There's a committee that's been assigned to investigate this issue but god only knows what they'll find out and what they're recommendation will be. But what our media reports is that Obama wants all the guns and ammo the 2nd amendment pertains to single shot muzzle loaders. We'd all be better off if we'd remember what business the news media is really in and that their main focus is to incite us one way or the other. If I never watched the news again or read a newspaper I wouldn't miss their over-exaggerations and half truths one bit. Even the ones that don't have a left/right agenda it seems have an agenda to sell news and they do that by forgetting to report certain info, dramatizing and exaggerating other info and just trying to incite the viewer and sell news one way or the other.
That was way longer than I wanted it to be but bottom line is keep these shooting massacre's identity anonymous and don't glorify them by showing their name and picture all over the news. And question 1/2 of the info the media gives us and just assume the other 1/2 are either lies or omissions for us to be incited to keep watching and to tell others so they'll watch too.
Yes this is my conspiracy theory and I'm sticking with it.