Anavar effects compared to Masteron

[brjrj0000]

Hey everyone. To those who have used both Anavar and masteron in separate cycles, how did anavar compare to masteron? Also how many weeks did you run it and at what dose?


STATS: I'm 28 been lifting for about 15 years. 6 foot 245lbs. Haven't measured my arms in awhile however, I'm assuming they are at the very least over 20+. I don't really bench although when I have in the past my best was around 500lbs. I've had some injury set backs but I'm easing back into it. I've done over 10 cycles. I've tried just about most of the more common types,aside from EQ and Anavar. I am looking to cut and I have had great experiences in the past with masteron , however, as of right now I only have a good source for Anavar.

Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks.

[MickeyKnox]

If that's you in your avi, you appear lean. What do you feel your BF% is using this template?

[Rv8G30]

Not to sound like an ass but I wish people would answer the question instead of asking so many questions. The guys not under aged and has plenty of cycle experience. The question was about the effects YOU saw on mast vs var. I too am curious to hear about peoples experiences on this exact topic.

Having said that, MickeyKnox have you tried a test + var cycle and a test + mast cycle? Could you compare the two and include if you were bulking or cutting? Thanks.

[Tron3219]

Not to sound like an ass but I wish people would answer the question instead of asking so many questions. The guys not under aged and has plenty of cycle experience. The question was about the effects YOU saw on mast vs var. I too am curious to hear about peoples experiences on this exact topic.

Having said that, MickeyKnox have you tried a test + var cycle and a test + mast cycle? Could you compare the two and include if you were bulking or cutting? Thanks.

Well u do sound like an ass. And to answer the question MK felt it necessary to ask that question to obtain more information about the person asking the question! I'm sure he was asking because the OP arms look lean but doesn't mean the rest of his body is. Mast at a higher bf will show less effectiveness because it shines at low bf. it gives a mic hard marble look to lean muscle. Var will give u a hard look too but not like mast. Var will increase strength more so then mast. The choice on which to use is completely based upon the one using, situation and goals. So pull ur panties out of ur ass and let us help people how we see fit. If u don't have anything constructive to say then keep ur mouth shut. Ur not helping anyone with asinine statements like that. Just stirring up shit!

-Chomp Chomp Chomp-Clink Clink Clink-

[gearbox]

Agree with both of the above mm asked cause mast will do nothing imo at high bf% nor will var. But if your higher I would run var. However, mast has a great way of hardening the muscles I didn't see in var. Where as, far gave me vascular affects, but if your low bf you should have that already.
Mk was asking a legitimate question to better assist you on YOUR question

[Leisure Suite Larry]

I'm running test e/deca/eq/mast now, love the mast and will run it in every cycle no matter what. I started with the mast simply to reduce estro but also add libido and hardening etc. It actually takes away a lot of the sides from other steroids i beleive.

[Granovich]

I'm running test e/deca/eq/mast now, love the mast and will run it in every cycle no matter what. I started with the mast simply to reduce estro but also add libido and hardening etc. It actually takes away a lot of the sides from other steroids i beleive.

what do you mean with " takes alot of the sides of other steroids"
thats bullshit, there is no such thing. it combats estrogen at small rate and you still need an AI... what other sides!

[Lunk1]

Agree with both of the above mm asked cause mast will do nothing imo at high bf% nor will var. But if your higher I would run var. However, mast has a great way of hardening the muscles I didn't see in var. Where as, far gave me vascular affects, but if your low bf you should have that already.
Mk was asking a legitimate question to better assist you on YOUR question

There are some other benifits of Mast no matter the BF%.

[Granovich]

There are some other benifits of Mast no matter the BF%.

some people ( knowledgeable members ) say that masteron will help melt fat even at 15% BF
and that " masteron doesnt work unless you are single digit BF" is bullshit.....i dont know what to believe. thats why i have some and i will run it last 4 weeks of my cycle and see how it works

[Lunk1]

some people ( knowledgeable members ) say that masteron will help melt fat even at 15% BF
and that " masteron doesnt work unless you are single digit BF" is bullshit.....i dont know what to believe. thats why i have some and i will run it last 4 weeks of my cycle and see how it works

Thats why you have to understand the compound. The "hardening" effect of Mast cannot really be seen unless you are quite lean. This is why I refer to it ogften as a competition compound, however Mast run within a stack Test/Tren/Mast for example will assist Tren in being more effective...kind of like a cheerleader if you will use that analogy

[austinite]

Mast works on any body fat percentage. It's the lower BF where you "see" a transformation.

[Granovich]

Mast works on any body fat percentage. It's the lower BF where you "see" a transformation.

and what would you SEE at higher bf, not very much higher , around 15%

[Times Roman]

Not to sound like an ass but I wish people would answer the question instead of asking so many questions. The guys not under aged and has plenty of cycle experience. The question was about the effects YOU saw on mast vs var. I too am curious to hear about peoples experiences on this exact topic.

Having said that, MickeyKnox have you tried a test + var cycle and a test + mast cycle? Could you compare the two and include if you were bulking or cutting? Thanks.

Mate,

We like to ask alot of questions here. Just the way it is. I see nothing wrong with MK's question. If he was out of line, we would have reduced his pay looong ago!

So relax, and take it easy

Peace

---Roman

[austinite]

and what would you SEE at higher bf, not very much higher , around 15%

double post......

[austinite]

and what would you SEE at higher bf, not very much higher , around 15%

Not much if anything. Maybe a harder-fat look. I've never used it high BF, 13% or less for me. But I know people who cycled at 18%+ and really didn't benefit in the "look" department.

[Lunk1]

Not much if anything. Maybe a harder-fat look. I've never used it high BF, 13% or less for me. But I know people who cycled at 18%+ and really didn't benefit in the "look" department.

True...and there are better compounds that are not near as expensive if you are just looking at it's anobolic effect

[Rv8G30]

Well u do sound like an ass. And to answer the question MK felt it necessary to ask that question to obtain more information about the person asking the question! I'm sure he was asking because the OP arms look lean but doesn't mean the rest of his body is. Mast at a higher bf will show less effectiveness because it shines at low bf. it gives a mic hard marble look to lean muscle. Var will give u a hard look too but not like mast. Var will increase strength more so then mast. The choice on which to use is completely based upon the one using, situation and goals. So pull ur panties out of ur ass and let us help people how we see fit. If u don't have anything constructive to say then keep ur mouth shut. Ur not helping anyone with asinine statements like that. Just stirring up shit!

-Chomp Chomp Chomp-Clink Clink Clink-

Thanks for answering the question. Much appreciated.

[Rv8G30]

Mate,

We like to ask alot of questions here. Just the way it is. I see nothing wrong with MK's question. If he was out of line, we would have reduced his pay looong ago!

So relax, and take it easy

Peace

---Roman

No man I dont think he was out of line. Just wanted to see the answer questioned about who used both compounds and what they thought of each.

[Antonious]

have people saw help in mast melting off the fat?

[gearbox]

Mast for the money, you should be low bf. It needs to be run at high doses which gets expensive

[Granovich]

Thats why you have to understand the compound. The "hardening" effect of Mast cannot really be seen unless you are quite lean. This is why I refer to it ogften as a competition compound, however Mast run within a stack Test/Tren/Mast for example will assist Tren in being more effective...kind of like a cheerleader if you will use that analogy

nice analogy LOL

[gearbox]

Thats why you have to understand the compound. The "hardening" effect of Mast cannot really be seen unless you are quite lean. This is why I refer to it ogften as a competition compound, however Mast run within a stack Test/Tren/Mast for example will assist Tren in being more effective...kind of like a cheerleader if you will use that analogy

If your not planning on being stage ready test and tren is plenty!!

[Granovich]

True...and there are better compounds that are not near as expensive if you are just looking at it's anobolic effect

whats an alternate for it ?
anavar ? winstrol ?
anavar is even more expensive, and winstrol kill your elbows, painful.

[Granovich]

If your not planning on being stage ready test and tren is plenty!!

doesnt Masteron lower SHBG which leads into more free testosterone and therefore more gains ?

[kelkel]

Thats why you have to understand the compound. The "hardening" effect of Mast cannot really be seen unless you are quite lean. This is why I refer to it ogften as a competition compound, however Mast run within a stack Test/Tren/Mast for example will assist Tren in being more effective...kind of like a cheerleader if you will use that analogy

Always liked cheerleaders. Really.

doesnt Masteron lower SHBG which leads into more free testosterone and therefore more gains ?

But the point is moot Grano as you'll be supraphysiologic anyway and the amount of test used on cycle will already have effectively suppressed your shbg.


ps: relevant question MK.

[Granovich]

Always liked cheerleaders. Really.






But the point is moot Grano as you'll be supraphysiologic anyway and the amount of test used on cycle will already have effectively suppressed your shbg.


ps: relevant question MK.

so Masteron is useless @ 15% BF ?
whats a good replacement for it to add to test ?

[MickeyKnox]

Not to sound like an ass but I wish people would answer the question instead of asking so many questions. The guys not under aged and has plenty of cycle experience. The question was about the effects YOU saw on mast vs var. I too am curious to hear about peoples experiences on this exact topic.

Having said that, MickeyKnox have you tried a test + var cycle and a test + mast cycle? Could you compare the two and include if you were bulking or cutting? Thanks.

I was simply trying to establish BF%. I meant no harm or foul.

Good luck on your cut.

[gearbox]

so Masteron is useless @ 15% BF ?
whats a good replacement for it to add to test ?

Thats the key is you really dont need anything with test if your diet and training properly. 500 a week is perfect for many. You should see if you can handle getting under 12% with test diet and cardio. Then you will know more how your body responds etc..

[kelkel]

so Masteron is useless @ 15% BF ?
whats a good replacement for it to add to test ?

Not saying it's useless at all. I just don't think it's worth it for the purpose of lowering shbg to gain more free T, when you will be using exogenous test anyway.

[OnTheSauce]

Mast should be ran at 500+ from everything I read. I used it last year at 350 a week and noticed things then. Im really excited for this go around at 600

[snowblowjoe]

My body fat is 1 percent. I should take a pic of myself so you can add to that avi pic

[brjrj0000]

Sorry just got home. The pic in my avatar is from 6-7 years ago before i even started my first cyce. My bodyfat will be back down aroun 9-10% before i start taking either again. I've ran masteron several times twice i was around 8% around once at 10% and both times had amazing results. Actually the time i was 10% i had better results because i believe the stuff was overdosed. To be honest i dont like getting down below 8% because my face starts looking too skinny and gross. Only problem is right now out of the two all i can get is anavar,however, it is at an extremely good price so price isn't an issue.

Bottom line what I am really trying to see is what peoples results were with anavar in comparision to masteron. Were your results with anavar similar to your results with masteron if ran at an adequate dose? Again i can get it for a good price so that isn't an issue. Plus it's legit
Thanks again

[frank13]

Hey everyone. To those who have used both Anavar and masteron in separate cycles, how did anavar compare to masteron? Also how many weeks did you run it and at what dose?


STATS: I'm 28 been lifting for about 15 years. 6 foot 245lbs. Haven't measured my arms in awhile however, I'm assuming they are at the very least over 20+. I don't really bench although when I have in the past my best was around 500lbs. I've had some injury set backs but I'm easing back into it. I've done over 10 cycles. I've tried just about most of the more common types,aside from EQ and Anavar. I am looking to cut and I have had great experiences in the past with masteron , however, as of right now I only have a good source for Anavar.

Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks.

i have done both i have to say i love mast i would have an iv of the stuff if i could it just makes me feel great harder/vascular in the body iv had friend hug me on mast and say dude your solid as a rock and on anavar i have been doing 50 to 80 mg daily and i like that to i have not noticed much as far as my body is concerned but my strength gains are really good from it

[snowblowjoe]

Anavar makes you poop alot

[brjrj0000]

assuming bf is not an issue

[brjrj0000]

damn yeah i keep hearing mixed things. starting to seem like the general consensus is that masteron has given people better results. Oh well i'll still have to get it ago, because right now the anavar is all i can afford. i've had a friend who has had amazing results with the same anavar supply though so we will see i guess

[snowblowjoe]

I hope you plan on alot of pooping

[Scabtree]

I like the chart MickeyKnox

[warmouth]

damn yeah i keep hearing mixed things. starting to seem like the general consensus is that masteron has given people better results. Oh well i'll still have to get it ago, because right now the anavar is all i can afford. i've had a friend who has had amazing results with the same anavar supply though so we will see i guess

Anavar is good man. No doubt. I've yet to run mast, but will be in about 4 weeks to get an opinion. Anavar treated me very well.