Philosophical Discussion #5: Is a sanctioned killing immoral?

[Chicagotarsier]

1. Killing vs Assassination. Separate that in the topic. Political agenda killing is bogus and why I left the military. I want no part of that moral dumpster fire. Winning a war is about conquering the people.

2. Killing is Nature's way of culling the heard. People go through the day with their head in the clouds and act like Survival of the Fittest is just a joke. I find it a far greater travesty to not know HOW to shoot a gun than to shoot it too many times.

3. Americans in general are oblivious to killing. They become ignorant and do what they can to "not see it" and accept any reason that allows them to cope. I am one that thinks the Trade Towers were demolition and it all was part of an insurance scheme and robbery plan. The proof is pretty clear when you review the chemistry residue and the fact a building that took no structural damage managed to fall on its own. Americans want to think their government is beyond this type of thing. There was a reason Hitler targeted the Jews in Germany and it was because they had no morality or sense of humanity...just greed and take whatever was not tied down or they could force others into. Due to marketing and propaganda it is Oh poor pitiful Jews....do your research and see what they were doing in the banking system at that time and it is a different picture. Moral of the Jew story: Thinking the government is going to protect you when the S*** hits the fan is a bad idea. Americans still think WWII was over the unjustified killing of Jews..lmao. Fn hilarious.

Saying all of that to say this. There are two sets of rules. Those for the rich and powerful and those for the not rich and powerful. Stallworth runs over a guy and kills him while driving fdrunk and the court says because he was not in a crosswalk Dante had limited liability and he spends less than 90 days in jail.....because he paid off the family and cut a deal...all because he was able to pay off the groups involved. Killing is the only equalizer the poor have and when they become bad at it the government has its way with the sheeple.

[Times Roman]

1. Killing vs Assassination. Separate that in the topic. Political agenda killing is bogus and why I left the military. I want no part of that moral dumpster fire. Winning a war is about conquering the people.

2. Killing is Nature's way of culling the heard. People go through the day with their head in the clouds and act like Survival of the Fittest is just a joke. I find it a far greater travesty to not know HOW to shoot a gun than to shoot it too many times.

3. Americans in general are oblivious to killing. They become ignorant and do what they can to "not see it" and accept any reason that allows them to cope. I am one that thinks the Trade Towers were demolition and it all was part of an insurance scheme and robbery plan. The proof is pretty clear when you review the chemistry residue and the fact a building that took no structural damage managed to fall on its own. Americans want to think their government is beyond this type of thing. There was a reason Hitler targeted the Jews in Germany and it was because they had no morality or sense of humanity...just greed and take whatever was not tied down or they could force others into. Due to marketing and propaganda it is Oh poor pitiful Jews....do your research and see what they were doing in the banking system at that time and it is a different picture. Moral of the Jew story: Thinking the government is going to protect you when the S*** hits the fan is a bad idea. Americans still think WWII was over the unjustified killing of Jews..lmao. Fn hilarious.Saying all of that to say this. There are two sets of rules. Those for the rich and powerful and those for the not rich and powerful. Stallworth runs over a guy and kills him while driving fdrunk and the court says because he was not in a crosswalk Dante had limited liability and he spends less than 90 days in jail.....because he paid off the family and cut a deal...all because he was able to pay off the groups involved. Killing is the only equalizer the poor have and when they become bad at it the government has its way with the sheeple.

I find this comment very distasteful. And a reflection as to your character. You will not last long on this board. I will not tolerate the BS hatred you spew.

Take a hike jerk

---Roman

[thisAngelBites]

I find it a far greater travesty to not know HOW to shoot a gun than to shoot it too many times.

Not at all intending to be the word police, but just in the name of understanding what you are trying to say, I'm going to assume you mean 'tragedy', not 'travesty' since travesty means a poor imitation of something which is often mocking or absurd, and since it doesn't make sense in the context of what you wrote, I suspect you meant tragedy.

But in all seriousness, you think it is worse to be unskilled in shooting than it is to kill people with a gun? Perhaps that is just a hyperbolic statement intended to convey that you think it is extremely important that people know how to shoot a gun, but if you mean it literally, it's laughable.

There was a reason Hitler targeted the Jews in Germany and it was because they had no morality or sense of humanity...

The person who thinks it is better to be someone who kills people than someone who does not know how to use a gun is now an expert on morality and humanity? And what about the immorality (not to mention poor reasoning) of concluding an entire group of people is completely homogeneous? To make sweeping statements that any one group of people is with or without any particular trait or virtue is so ridiculous as to not be worth any serious response.

just greed and take whatever was not tied down or they could force others into. Due to marketing and propaganda it is Oh poor pitiful Jews....do your research and see what they were doing in the banking system at that time and it is a different picture. Moral of the Jew story: Thinking the government is going to protect you when the S*** hits the fan is a bad idea. Americans still think WWII was over the unjustified killing of Jews..lmao. Fn hilarious.

And now you show you know fvck all about history. First of all, throughout most of history, jews have been forbidden to own land, so they could not make livings via farming and that sort of thing. Secondly, christians established trade guilds that were exclusive to christians, so many jews were forced out of trades and many areas of commerce. Then the church forbade christians to lend money to people and charge interest (and back then people actually followed church rules), which had the practical effect of people not lending money. People needed to borrow money then, as they do now, to finance all sort of things, like wars and for many personal reasons. I suppose it's all marketing and propaganda however, and it's just down to the jews being immoral.

[Times Roman]

Not at all intending to be the word police, but just in the name of understanding what you are trying to say, I'm going to assume you mean 'tragedy', not 'travesty' since travesty means a poor imitation of something which is often mocking or absurd, and since it doesn't make sense in the context of what you wrote, I suspect you meant tragedy.

But in all seriousness, you think it is worse to be unskilled in shooting than it is to kill people with a gun? Perhaps that is just a hyperbolic statement intended to convey that you think it is extremely important that people know how to shoot a gun, but if you mean it literally, it's laughable.



The person who thinks it is better to be someone who kills people than someone who does not know how to use a gun is now an expert on morality and humanity? And what about the immorality (not to mention poor reasoning) of concluding an entire group of people is completely homogeneous? To make sweeping statements that any one group of people is with or without any particular trait or virtue is so ridiculous as to not be worth any serious response.



And now you show you know fvck all about history. First of all, throughout most of history, jews have been forbidden to own land, so they could not make livings via farming and that sort of thing. Secondly, christians established trade guilds that were exclusive to christians, so many jews were forced out of trades and many areas of commerce. Then the church forbade christians to lend money to people and charge interest (and back then people actually followed church rules), which had the practical effect of people not lending money. People needed to borrow money then, as they do now, to finance all sort of things, like wars and for many personal reasons. I suppose it's all marketing and propaganda however, and it's just down to the jews being immoral.

Angel,

I'm glad we are on the same team! =)

You are an intellectual steam roller

You go girl!

---Roman

[jimmyinkedup]

1. Killing vs Assassination. Separate that in the topic. Political agenda killing is bogus and why I left the military. I want no part of that moral dumpster fire. Winning a war is about conquering the people.

2. Killing is Nature's way of culling the heard. People go through the day with their head in the clouds and act like Survival of the Fittest is just a joke. I find it a far greater travesty to not know HOW to shoot a gun than to shoot it too many times.

3. Americans in general are oblivious to killing. They become ignorant and do what they can to "not see it" and accept any reason that allows them to cope. I am one that thinks the Trade Towers were demolition and it all was part of an insurance scheme and robbery plan. The proof is pretty clear when you review the chemistry residue and the fact a building that took no structural damage managed to fall on its own. Americans want to think their government is beyond this type of thing. There was a reason Hitler targeted the Jews in Germany and it was because they had no morality or sense of humanity...just greed and take whatever was not tied down or they could force others into. Due to marketing and propaganda it is Oh poor pitiful Jews....do your research and see what they were doing in the banking system at that time and it is a different picture. Moral of the Jew story: Thinking the government is going to protect you when the S*** hits the fan is a bad idea. Americans still think WWII was over the unjustified killing of Jews..lmao. Fn hilarious.

Saying all of that to say this. There are two sets of rules. Those for the rich and powerful and those for the not rich and powerful. Stallworth runs over a guy and kills him while driving fdrunk and the court says because he was not in a crosswalk Dante had limited liability and he spends less than 90 days in jail.....because he paid off the family and cut a deal...all because he was able to pay off the groups involved. Killing is the only equalizer the poor have and when they become bad at it the government has its way with the sheeple.

Spew you hatred and prejudice elsewhere. So what , justifiable genocide? People like you make me sick.