Bush's fake Turkey

[markas214]

If people wanted to hear more liberal talk then there would be more liberal broadcasting going on. It's called supply and demand. Something that doesn't exist in a socialist mindset.

As far as asking the hard questions...they could just answer with lies like Clinton did.

"Canadians have more guns per capita than we do..." That is way off base. Owning a gun in Canada is a VERY difficult process. You have to get "permission" to transport a gun to go hunt, etc. Talk with RedKetchup about what all is involved with owning guns in Canada. I'm not sure but I don't think handguns are allowed.

All this talk about GW and a fake turkey. Do we not want to talk about an economy that was already on the tumble that GW inherited from Clinton and has fixed with his tax cuts. NO....let's talk about him holding a fake turkey (which by the way, was mainly for the pictures that were taken with the soldiers...which most dems won't even recognize as being the important reason he was in Iraq to begin with.)

While we are on the Clinton subject...why doesn't anyone mention how bad he cut the military back to basically nothing. Thank goodness GW has come back in and fixed that little screw up also!

And regarding the economy in the 1990's...you are right, it was a GREAT economy. Of course we had a republican house and senate passing all of the laws. How could it not have been a good economy?

Does no one want to talk about backstabbing Al Gore? Wow...what a good friend he is. Sure wish he was running the country????????????? NOT!

peace,

ttgb

Ha. How could Clinton unilaterrally cut back the military, which he didn't, without the aproval of the Republican legistature who as you point out had control. Bush has not added one soldier since taking office. In fact if you have any friends or family, I have 2 nephews in the 82nd Airborne, one in Mosul, you would know these guys are demoralized and aren't reenlisting. I would imagine a manpower shortage and reinstitution of the draft if there is a GW part II in the Whitehouse in 2005.

[tryingtogetbig]

Ha. How could Clinton unilaterrally cut back the military, which he didn't, without the aproval of the Republican legistature who as you point out had control. Bush has not added one soldier since taking office. In fact if you have any friends or family, I have 2 nephews in the 82nd Airborne, one in Mosul, you would know these guys are demoralized and aren't reenlisting. I would imagine a manpower shortage and reinstitution of the draft if there is a GW part II in the Whitehouse in 2005.

I do have family in Iraq...lost a cousin 3 weeks ago over there. As far as being "demoralized"...it all depends on who you talk to I guess. You must be getting your "unbiased" information from CNN. All of the emails/letter/phone calls that my family gets back don't depict that from the soldiers. Besides, they are f'cking soldiers for christ's sake. They are not suppose to be "I'm tired, people are shooting at me....I wanna go home" They are f'cking soldiers. Welcome to the military for those that can't hack it, get the hell out when your time is up.

Bush has added LOTS of money to the military budget!!! Thank goodness. Raised the enlisted salaryies also. But of course, you can take your angle of "hasn't added 1 soldier" to the head count. Typical liberal spin on things.

peace,

ttgb