
Originally Posted by
Windex
There isn't a black and white answer - you won't find studies from cycle dosages of gear because a Doctor would lose their lisence prescribing 600mg of test. Plus, several steroids weren't even designed for fitness or weightlifting. Tren was created for cattle feeding. EQ was invented for horses. Anadrol was invented for anemia. Insulin for diabetes and so on.
It's just happenstance that "we" found PCT drugs for recovery in the first place. Nolva was made to treat breast cancer.
Also, just because someone says they recover fully means nothing out of context. Someone could go for blood work, have levels be in range (which are often large ranges to begin with), call the office for results, then the doctor or doctors office tells them their levels are normal. Many people interpret this as fully recovering even though they never even see the blood work results. Additionally, people often don't get a complete panel done. So they might test for 90% of the required which comes back fine and miss the other 10%.
There's also the matter of incompetence - how many people start a post with Ive done a lot of research and want to do this cycle, and their proposed plan is a complete train wreck. How many people can actually explain for example the pharmacology of Nolvadex and Clomid, rather than just parrot they are used in PCT?
The idea of a "light or safe" cycle is a misconception and oxymoron. Your endocrine system producing the respective hormones is shut down 100%. The easiest way to illustrate this is with TRT - minimum dose required to function and still 0 FSH and LH production, which is why there is HCG.
Decreasing Test levels from aging is known information - that's just how the male body works. The impact, velocity, and gradient to which steroids affect Test levels is impossible to definitively prove because of so many factors/variables.