
Originally Posted by
Proximal
Look fiddle, I understand where you're coming from & your point is somewhat valid.
I'm just a grumpy old man sometimes, but with that said, bro-science gets under my skin, my last post was out of line.
I'm kind of debating this one with GH as well.
There are weight bearing exercises such as squats, DLs, presses in which the load is fully supported by joints such as your spine, hips, knees, ankles & in the case of presses; shoulders, elbows & wrists.
An argument can be made that an increase in weight used could potentially be more destructive to joints at a given time, however you are not accounting for frequency of movement that cumulatively has more of a sheering effect upon the joints? So if you are bumping up the quantity, even with less resistance, that must be accounted for.