Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: Sarms

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Quote Originally Posted by cylon357 View Post
    I'm sure women can run SARMs, but I think low dose var would be a better choice if you can get your hands on it right now. The only real reasoning I have for that is that there seems to be a much greater body of knowledge on AAS than on SARMs.

    I know in the VERY LITTLE reading I have done on SARMs, they seem to generally carry most of the negatives of AAS and lesser benefit... So I ask myself: why not just use the real thing?

    I"m hoping somebody more knowledgeable than me (that won't take much ) chines in on this.



    Thanks, I run gear on and off - 8 week cycles.. I build muscle so easy..and I just came of a var, winnny, clen cycle...I lost fat yes, but I am giving my body some time to recover from all that. And trying to figure out something else in the mean time.

    I appreciate the response =)

  2. #2
    Quote Originally Posted by Tinybunny View Post
    Thanks, I run gear on and off - 8 week cycles.. I build muscle so easy..and I just came of a var, winnny, clen cycle...I lost fat yes, but I am giving my body some time to recover from all that. And trying to figure out something else in the mean time.

    I appreciate the response =)
    Sarms from a real source is good for women. Lgd-4033, RAD-140, S23, mk-677, mk-2866 and YK-11 are my favorite sarms.

    It's true var and winni is better then sarms however changing things up once in a while helps.

    Sent from my SM-S327VL using Tapatalk

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •