Aussie news: Leader of the free world is cognitively compromised

[wango]

The thing with Iran is is started as an effort to work towards nuclear power plants/ peaceful use of nuclear power. After the oyster of the Shah of Iran, their efforts totally focused on enrichment for use in weapons.


https://www.nti.org/learn/countries/iran/nuclear/

Please read my other post.

Fine, so ONLY WE can have weapons?

I disagree with that. As said before, we do it bigger and better. And then try if you want, but it won’t work out in your favor.

[almostgone]

Please read my other post.

Fine, so ONLY WE can have weapons?

I disagree with that. As said before, we do it bigger and better. And then try if you want, but it won’t work out in your favor.

No, you may have read, but you didn't read my post with understanding. The whole nuclear process with Iran started for humanitarian reasons and when the leadership was ousted and the radical regime was in charge, they began enriching uranium for purposes of possessing nuclear weapons despite declaring they weren't doing so.

Now, "Wango", think about it. You have a country that threatens to rain fire on its enemies....I mean really. Think about it. You are going to encourage them to continue to do so?

As far as us being the only one with nuclear weapons, I know you know better than that AND we aren't the only country that was involved in monitoring Iran and they are notoriously deceptive, not to mention extremely unstable. You can very easily research and find out the known nuclear powers...you are/were a schoolteacher.

No, nuclear arms proliferation isn't what we need. A reduction would actually be great. However, encouraging Iran's development of nuclear weapons is highly illogical.

In regards to your statement "Fine, so ONLY WE can have weapons? " That is a cop out. You know we aren't the sole nuclear power and we aren't the sole signatory to the JCPOA.

I will say again....I absolutely grieve for the general Iranian public, but I despise their leadership.