Results 1 to 25 of 25

Thread: Who was Ashley Babbitt?

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Quote Originally Posted by wango View Post
    What’s really laughable was finding out who the knucklehead(s) is/are that is/are likely “Q”. To think that people followed them is what’s tragic.

    Didn’t she work security for some nuclear company, before running her pool company? That nuclear/radiation stuff can really mess someone up I’m thinking . Off topic I know, but go clean energy.
    Wango, I hope you're not suggesting that her killing was justified because she believed, or you think she believed something you don't, or that you disagree with
    Last edited by Hughinn; 05-01-2021 at 04:27 PM.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Sep 2020
    Posts
    3,477
    Quote Originally Posted by Hughinn View Post
    Wango, I hope you're not suggesting that her killing was justified excuse she believed, or you think she believed something you don't, or that you disagree with
    Oh hell no! Not even remotely Hughinn. Come on man, I hope you think more highly of me after how much we have exchanged.

    I thought that the police did an amazing job of restraining themselves. Personally, I think they should have shot them all.

    Regarding her though, things that I’ve read have really suggested how heavily she was influenced by Q’s belief system. If this dork really is Q (and damn the evidence was compelling), I’d kind of be embarrassed that I gave this guy a second of my time, let alone had any influence on my decisions.

  3. #3
    Quote Originally Posted by wango View Post
    Oh hell no! Not even remotely Hughinn. Come on man, I hope you think more highly of me after how much we have exchanged.

    I thought that the police did an amazing job of restraining themselves. Personally, I think they should have shot them all.


    Regarding her though, things that I’ve read have really suggested how heavily she was influenced by Q’s belief system. If this dork really is Q (and damn the evidence was compelling), I’d kind of be embarrassed that I gave this guy a second of my time, let alone had any influence on my decisions.
    Yes sir, I respect your opinions.


    I agree with you that her beliefs , whatever they were, led her to that spot on that fateful day. But, I also believe American citizens have a right to act peacefully and non-violent on thier beliefs.

    We were told all last summer that rioting, looting, burning, beating people and vandalizing property was "healthy and peaceful protests, protected under the first amendment "

    I have a hard time understanding why attempting to burn down police stations and federal courthouses in Portland, while throwing fire bombs at police is "peaceful demonstration", and police defending themselves from those violent mobs was "police brutality"

    But loitering on the steps of the capital building is justification for killing someone who undeniably posed no physical threat to anybody

    Except that one instance served the interest of the democrat party, and the other was in opposition.
    Thats literally the only logical difference I can think of.

    And when killing people is accepted because some people don't like thier beliefs, and we allow one political party to make those distinctions based upon it's own interests and quest for power,, then God help us all for the hell we've got coming. Regardless of which side you stand on
    Last edited by Hughinn; 05-01-2021 at 04:48 PM.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Sep 2020
    Posts
    3,477
    Quote Originally Posted by Hughinn View Post
    Yes sir, I respect your opinions.


    I agree with you that her beliefs , whatever they were, led her to that spot on that fateful day. But, I also believe American citizens have a right to act peacefully and non-violent on thier beliefs.

    We were told all last summer that rioting, looting, burning, beating people and vandalizing property was "healthy and peaceful protests, protected under the first amendment "

    I have a hard time understanding why attempting to burn down police stations and federal courthouses in Portland, while throwing fire bombs at police is "peaceful demonstration"

    But loitering on the steps of the capital building is justification for killing someone.
    I’m guilty of not following the Portland occurrences. I’m all for Police protecting themselves and given the benefit of a doubt in doing so. If there was a danger of personal injury or death to others, then shoot at will in my opinion. If that occurred in Portland, shoot them all as well.

    I’m not talking about taking action of those that did not enter the Capitol and posed no reasonable threat at that time.

    AND STOP CALLING ME SIR

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •