Results 1 to 40 of 1361

Thread: Guns and Ammo Thread

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    3,587
    My penchant for .22LR is all about price.

    I'm just dipping my toes here into the sport of shooting, and I have a friend of mine telling me to get a 9mm Glock, but I'm going with a .22LR revolver. Because cheap ammo and no feeding issues.

    When my firearms certificate is approved and I can take my new gun home, I'm gonna take the cylinder out and use a vernier callipers on it to get measurements, then I'll try make a file for a CNC lathe to make a perfect replica of the cylinder. If I can make a fully-functional cylinder that works just as good as the original, then next I will try to put more holes in the cylinder. Right now the capacity is 7 but I'd love to bump it up a bit to 10 or more.

    Here's how it looks right now:

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Screenshot_2023-09-18-17-23-06-16_40deb401b9ffe8e1df2f1cc5ba480b12.jpg 
Views:	65 
Size:	473.9 KB 
ID:	182747

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    the lower carolina
    Posts
    25,591
    Quote Originally Posted by Fluidic Kimbo View Post
    My penchant for .22LR is all about price.

    I'm just dipping my toes here into the sport of shooting, and I have a friend of mine telling me to get a 9mm Glock, but I'm going with a .22LR revolver. Because cheap ammo and no feeding issues.

    When my firearms certificate is approved and I can take my new gun home, I'm gonna take the cylinder out and use a vernier callipers on it to get measurements, then I'll try make a file for a CNC lathe to make a perfect replica of the cylinder. If I can make a fully-functional cylinder that works just as good as the original, then next I will try to put more holes in the cylinder. Right now the capacity is 7 but I'd love to bump it up a bit to 10 or more.

    Here's how it looks right now:

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Screenshot_2023-09-18-17-23-06-16_40deb401b9ffe8e1df2f1cc5ba480b12.jpg 
Views:	65 
Size:	473.9 KB 
ID:	182747
    That won't work. If there is space (very doubtful), you will still have to time the cylinder to the hammer and still be in line with the bore. If you're going to bastardize the thing and risk hurting someone else, I hope they deny you the firearm. That is one of the most irresponsible ideas I've ever heard.

    You don't f-in file accurate holes. You center drill them, drill them, then ream them in an accurate location.

    Up to now, I thought you were more intelligent than that. Weird, but more intelligent.
    Last edited by almostgone; 09-18-2023 at 11:31 AM.
    There are 3 loves in my life: my wife, my English mastiffs, and my weightlifting....Man, my wife gets really pissed when I get the 3 confused...
    A minimum of 100 posts and 45 days membership required for source checks. Source checks are performed at my discretion.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Nov 2018
    Location
    AKA "Nice Guy Cy"
    Posts
    3,601
    Quote Originally Posted by almostgone View Post
    That won't work.
    It's almost like timing, degrees and minutes of angle are important. Dang, I guess we really WILL use high school math after all...

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    the lower carolina
    Posts
    25,591
    Quote Originally Posted by Cylon357 View Post
    It's almost like timing, degrees and minutes of angle are important. Dang, I guess we really WILL use high school math after all...
    Exactly. The diameter and pitch of the pattern to receive the cartridges is critical.....in addition to the timing.

    Who wants to attempt to fire a revolver with the cylinder out of time....dang, talk about shaving lead ( if you get off that lucky).
    There are 3 loves in my life: my wife, my English mastiffs, and my weightlifting....Man, my wife gets really pissed when I get the 3 confused...
    A minimum of 100 posts and 45 days membership required for source checks. Source checks are performed at my discretion.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    3,587
    Quote Originally Posted by Cylon357 View Post
    It's almost like timing, degrees and minutes of angle are important.
    After I bring the gun home and remove the cylinder, I'll see if it's possible to adjust the degrees by which the trigger rotates the cylinder.

    Of course if I ever did put a custom-made cylinder in it, I'd test it without ammo a thousand times, and then I'd test it with blanks a thousand times, before trying a real round.

    The engraving along the side of the barrel is horrible, it says TRACKER in big capital letters. I wonder if there's any way I could have the engraving filled in.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    3,587
    I see that someone has made a picatinny rail to fit the Taurus Tracker so I might get it and stick a green laser on it.

    Also there's a deer stalking course next month so I might do it. Stalking deer with a revolver with a green laser would be enjoyable.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    The Dude Abides
    Posts
    10,980
    Quote Originally Posted by almostgone View Post
    That won't work. If there is space (very doubtful), you will still have to time the cylinder to the hammer and still be in line with the bore. If you're going to bastardize the thing and risk hurting someone else, I hope they deny you the firearm. That is one of the most irresponsible ideas I've ever heard.

    You don't f-in file accurate holes. You center drill them, drill them, then ream them in an accurate location.

    Up to now, I thought you were more intelligent than that. Weird, but more intelligent.
    There are speedloaders for most revolvers that are currently in production. Besides, the cylinders that the gun manufacturer made have been thoroughly tested to be able to withstand the pressures of the rounds they shoot. If you mill some cylinder, even if you get timing right on it, You don't know if that thing is going to work time after time or if it's going to be a pipebomb in your hand.

    Actually, after thinking about this a little more. I full support Kimbo making himself a cylinder for his revolver. I just think he needs to go with a higher caliber than .22lr.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    england/north east
    Posts
    10,240
    Quote Originally Posted by Fluidic Kimbo View Post
    My penchant for .22LR is all about price.

    I'm just dipping my toes here into the sport of shooting, and I have a friend of mine telling me to get a 9mm Glock, but I'm going with a .22LR revolver. Because cheap ammo and no feeding issues.

    When my firearms certificate is approved and I can take my new gun home, I'm gonna take the cylinder out and use a vernier callipers on it to get measurements, then I'll try make a file for a CNC lathe to make a perfect replica of the cylinder. If I can make a fully-functional cylinder that works just as good as the original, then next I will try to put more holes in the cylinder. Right now the capacity is 7 but I'd love to bump it up a bit to 10 or more.

    Here's how it looks right now:

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Screenshot_2023-09-18-17-23-06-16_40deb401b9ffe8e1df2f1cc5ba480b12.jpg 
Views:	65 
Size:	473.9 KB 
ID:	182747
    If by some miracle you did increase the ammo capacity. Then it wouldn’t conform to the FAC.
    no open source posting
    keep all source request's to PM'S please


    someone once said to me a clever man learn's by his own mistake's. But a wise man learn's by the mistake's of other people.


    detailed detection times
    at least 45 day's active use and 100 posts for a source check
    unsure about the rule's please read up
    thread for first cycle choices


    SOURCE CHECKS CLICK HERE

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 8 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 8 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •