Results 1 to 40 of 76

Thread: Separation of Church and State.

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    not where I want to be
    Posts
    6,696
    i think you guys did not read what i wrote after the 3 examples. "immediately after these arguments were made they were sure to point out that "none of these HAD happened but they COULD happen if we teach sex ed"

    basically, there were some people preaching that this is possible if you teach sex ed in school. they were also claiming that it would somehow be against the will of the church to teach sed ed in school and therefore should not be done. this is clearly related to church and state.

    mr death, I disagree. I think it has everything to do with church and state. There is a heap of legislation drawn strictly from church guidlines. on what is morally right and wrong. abortion for example (but thats for another thread) so I think it has everything to do with church and state. there are two sides to everything. the church is not automatically 'right'

    Personally, i could not believe when they said they didnt want to teach sex ed because the 3 examples above COULD happen. I can play the What if game all day long but it doesnt amount to dry ****. I could die driving to work in the morning, that doesnt mean i should stay home the rest of my life....

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    In the Gym, if i could
    Posts
    15,927
    I don't think it has anything to do with church and state..

    The parents of a child have the right to teach that child thier moral standards,

    Not the dictated morality of someone else..

    that is what is at issue..

    Then the school come back with the argument that some families won't teach anything to the children.. thus endangering the child...

    example is... a 14 yr old girl believing she will not get pregnant if she has sex standing up......... and yes it still happens..




    Quote Originally Posted by symatech
    i think you guys did not read what i wrote after the 3 examples. "immediately after these arguments were made they were sure to point out that "none of these HAD happened but they COULD happen if we teach sex ed"

    basically, there were some people preaching that this is possible if you teach sex ed in school. they were also claiming that it would somehow be against the will of the church to teach sed ed in school and therefore should not be done. this is clearly related to church and state.

    mr death, I disagree. I think it has everything to do with church and state. There is a heap of legislation drawn strictly from church guidlines. on what is morally right and wrong. abortion for example (but thats for another thread) so I think it has everything to do with church and state. there are two sides to everything. the church is not automatically 'right'

    Personally, i could not believe when they said they didnt want to teach sex ed because the 3 examples above COULD happen. I can play the What if game all day long but it doesnt amount to dry ****. I could die driving to work in the morning, that doesnt mean i should stay home the rest of my life....
    The answer to your every question

    Rules

    A bigot is a person obstinately or intolerantly devoted
    to his or her own opinions and prejudices, especially
    one exhibiting intolerance, and animosity toward those of differing beliefs.


    If you get scammed by an UGL listed on this board or by another member here, it's all part of the game and learning experience for you,
    we do not approve nor support any sources that may be listed on this site.
    I will not do source checks for you, the peer review from other members should be enough to help you make a decision on your quest. Buyer beware.
    Don't Let the Police kick your ass

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Kentucky
    Posts
    1,441
    Quote Originally Posted by symatech
    i think you guys did not read what i wrote after the 3 examples. "immediately after these arguments were made they were sure to point out that "none of these HAD happened but they COULD happen if we teach sex ed"

    basically, there were some people preaching that this is possible if you teach sex ed in school. they were also claiming that it would somehow be against the will of the church to teach sed ed in school and therefore should not be done. this is clearly related to church and state.

    mr death, I disagree. I think it has everything to do with church and state. There is a heap of legislation drawn strictly from church guidlines. on what is morally right and wrong. abortion for example (but thats for another thread) so I think it has everything to do with church and state. there are two sides to everything. the church is not automatically 'right'

    Personally, i could not believe when they said they didnt want to teach sex ed because the 3 examples above COULD happen. I can play the What if game all day long but it doesnt amount to dry ****. I could die driving to work in the morning, that doesnt mean i should stay home the rest of my life....
    I agree that if anyone thinks those three situations are possible they are grossly misguided, and that is a ridiculous argument against sex ed in schools.

    The only thing our constitution guards against in regards to the seperation of church and state is the legislation of the establishment of a state church. If the government wants to make laws that are drawn from any religious text that is completely within their right as our constitution is written.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •