Results 1 to 40 of 63

Thread: anybody watch the choose or lose on MTV with kerry?

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Michigan State University
    Posts
    1,528
    The interview was decent, better than pretty much every bush interview I've ever seen. The interview I'm really looking forward to is Condy Rices testimony to the 9/11 commission. Of course I still don't understand why bush and cheney will testify as a TEAM to the 9/11 committee in private. Of course I think that the white house's response to dick clarke tells you volumes about the current administration.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    NW of DFW TX
    Posts
    3,425
    Quote Originally Posted by saboudian
    The interview was decent, better than pretty much every bush interview I've ever seen. The interview I'm really looking forward to is Condy Rices testimony to the 9/11 commission. Of course I still don't understand why bush and cheney will testify as a TEAM to the 9/11 committee in private. Of course I think that the white house's response to dick clarke tells you volumes about the current administration.
    Dr Rice's interview should be good. We'll finally get to hear the truth...afterall, she doesn't have a book to sell, so why would she lie? Dick Clarke has already been caught in SEVERAL lies people...wake up.

    Oh yeah, they (Bush administration) were all in office for a grand total of 7.5 months prior to the Sept. 11 attacks....it took 2 months just to repair the White House after the Clintons left....they tore the place up. What the hell were they suppose to do in 7.5 months in order to prevent the attacks? Geez...you guys listen to too much media BS. I'm not targeting you Saboudian, I just got on a soapbox after I replied to your post....

    peace,

    ttgb

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Michigan State University
    Posts
    1,528
    Quote Originally Posted by tryingtogetbig
    Dr Rice's interview should be good. We'll finally get to hear the truth...afterall, she doesn't have a book to sell, so why would she lie? Dick Clarke has already been caught in SEVERAL lies people...wake up.

    Oh yeah, they (Bush administration) were all in office for a grand total of 7.5 months prior to the Sept. 11 attacks....it took 2 months just to repair the White House after the Clintons left....they tore the place up. What the hell were they suppose to do in 7.5 months in order to prevent the attacks? Geez...you guys listen to too much media BS. I'm not targeting you Saboudian, I just got on a soapbox after I replied to your post....

    peace,

    ttgb
    Dick Clarke caught in several lies? Not a single one yet. Remember last week when every bush official went on every freakin talk show and called him a liar? They didn't even revoke a single statement or accusation he has ever made.

    BTW did you see any of Dick Clarke's testimony to the 9/11 committee? I'll let u in on a secret, every member of that committe thanked him for his service and told him is his integrity wasn't in question at all.

    About that thing about bush only having 7.5 months, pulease. The bush administration was concentrating nearly all their effort on missile defense. And don't gimme that crap about Clinton, he gave orders to the CIA to kill bin laden, attempted to do so at least twice, unfortunately the CIA failed, and when Bush took over, and the former natl security advisor even told condy rice about terrorism being the most important issue. Now look, I am in no way implying 9/11 could have been prevented, but there's something wrong with this administration not admitting any faults and viciously attacking those who come out against it like clarke and o'neil, instead of actually responding to what they're saying.

    ugh, i'm tired, will respond later when i am not tired and sick

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    SE Texas
    Posts
    651
    Quote Originally Posted by saboudian
    And don't gimme that crap about Clinton, he gave orders to the CIA to kill bin laden, attempted to do so at least twice, unfortunately the CIA failed, and when Bush took over, and the former natl security advisor even told condy rice about terrorism being the most important issue.
    You've got that a little wrong. After the bombings in Africa clinton tried in a futile attempt at killing bin Laden with the cruise missles. Clinton never gave the CIA authorization to "assassinate" bin Laden, but told the CIA to attempt to capture him. BUT if the mission looked like it would fail then they could kill him. So they were all confused, and the real question is why didn't the CIA ask to clear things up.

    Well the CIA had 6 chances to capture him. 4 were aborted because of too many civilians, and 2 were because he changed his route of travel.

    Sym
    Last edited by Symian; 04-05-2004 at 03:10 AM.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •