apparently nobody cares..
Jason-A please answer a few questions about the SRCS lab test you posted:
You say this is an SRCS
1. Where it says Set ID#-this should be a 5 or 6 digit #, not a word, yours says 'paper' I have seen dozens of lab reports from SRCS and they always have a 5 or 6 digit number there.
2. The Client ID# should just be a description of what the SRCS lab tech has in front of him-tablets, or if it was a vial with a lable on it, it would say for example-"Testosterone Propionate 250mg/ml..
Yours says "Paperbolix Papervar"
3. I have never seen an SRCS report in which they tested for 2 separate chemicals at the same time, this is not possible as for each test you conduct you have to use a CONTROL chemical for the test, it should be 2 separate tests with 2 documents-furthermore even if you did test for 2 it was supposed to be a test for oxandrolone; how would they
know to also test for stanozolol, why not oxan and oxy?
4. Who sent in the paper sample and what motivated hm to pay the 1XX $s for 2 tests? 2large?
other then that-it's a nice little piece of desktop publishing
The document posted on paperbolix is consistent with all other SRCS lab reports I have seen, your's is an obvious fake, I would think that you have seen enough SRCS reports to know this was fake..
I will attempt to verify both reports next week by email even though this one is clearly FAKE.
update-i just spent the last 30 minutes looking at 1 srcs lab report after another-not a SINGLE one has the above noted irregularities-particularly point #1 and #3, please just answer those points or withdraw the fake document