View Poll Results: Respectable bicep size?

Voters
56. You may not vote on this poll
  • 14"

    2 3.57%
  • 15"

    5 8.93%
  • 16"

    11 19.64%
  • 17"

    38 67.86%
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 41 to 52 of 52

Thread: Respectable bicep size?

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    358
    So I'm able to push about 120% of my body weight.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    358
    Again, I am interested in overall gains. Right this second, I'm just curious about how these overall gains will effect the size of my biceps. I believe I'm already putting equal effort into each area of my body, and will continue to do so while on cycle.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    2,886
    Quote Originally Posted by SensP
    Ok, sorry if this sounds like a stupid question. Just wondering what you guys think is a respectable size for a guy's biceps. Respectable in the sense that they don't look like puny fu*****.
    5 ft 11 inches and 175 is actually above the human species norm. I was reading that doctors consider a male of about 5 ft 10 inches, 155 lbs with 13.5 inch biceps to be the non-weight lifting healthy size/purportion and this is also considered to be the US Navy's recommendation for ideal size/shape.

    I think on this board, someone who is 5 ft 11 inches, 175 lbs and 15.5 inch arms would be considered puny HERE, but by doctor's and US Navy standards, that is considered to be an over-muscular freak or obese!!

    I am only in the low 180's/5ft 10" and even though I am 9% body fat, plugging data into the navy method calculations, I too am now considered to be obese by Navy standards as well as anyone bigger then me I think.

    Just things to think about, to get 15 inch arms or larger is something our genes dont readily support without being obese. We all had to do something to break our genetic limitations, that including: lifting weights, taking steroids, etc.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    358
    5' 10" with 13.5" biceps is their ideal? Seems to me they'd want stronger guys.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Nor Cal
    Posts
    127
    6' 5".....22" bis....

    J

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Posts
    2,999
    If your calves look big and your arms measure the same as your calves, then you have respectable biceps.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    358
    Quote Originally Posted by The Baron
    If your calves look big and your arms measure the same as your calves, then you have respectable biceps.
    Interesting. The only criteria here are looking like you have big calves (whatever that means) and exact symetry between the biceps and the calves. The ancient Greeks were of course the first to measure one element of bodily perfection by comparing the size of the calves and the biceps.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    yeah right
    Posts
    426
    i'm 5'5 with 19" bi's, i think that's pretty big, but 19.5-20" would kick ass

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Jessica Albas' ASS
    Posts
    1,777
    5'11" 260lbs 20.5" and growing

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Bandit County
    Posts
    0
    WHAT

    there no respectable size in that selection!


    thank you, lift again

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    all up in yo' buttho'
    Posts
    2,720
    no sensp there is no way you're gonna gain a few inches per cycle. rule of thumb is one inch gained in arm size is equal to 15 lbs. LBM. maybe 2" but not likely, def. not three.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    358
    Ok. Thanks for answering me.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •