using that term noob like you know me because of my post count is pretty funny. good assumptions.
asking for studies to back up your claim:
is not a flame, nor is it:
bashing? what scientific facts did you state? nothing, you reiterated what you read and cut and pasted a bunch of work from someone else. you made claims that are "scientific" without ever saying anything scientific besides posting profiles. you couldn't reproduce 1 line from one of these studies. that is how you prove something and collect data to support your claims. you did none of that and that is what i asked for. then YOU began with the "noob" and "shut the **** up".
you need to relax and reread my posts, i wanted the studies for my good to change my mind. you got all huffy and started the typical internet bs. your way too sensitive if my posts were taken as a flame, WAY TOO SENSITIVE.
to make everything better, here - for you second place for being a cry baby about the whole thing.

j/k