Results 1 to 40 of 48

Thread: EQ question

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    canada
    Posts
    36

    EQ question

    Awsome site, been observing from the sidelines for awhile. Anyway, presuming test e. will shut you down faster and to a greater degree than EQ, would it make sense to start the EQ 4 weeks sooner than the test, then run both for 10 weeks? Only bringing this up because the consensus seems to be to run EQ for a minimum of 12 weeks, and I don't want to run test for that long.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Yes,those are my legs
    Posts
    4,540
    Quote Originally Posted by thermodave
    Awsome site, been observing from the sidelines for awhile. Anyway, presuming test e. will shut you down faster and to a greater degree than EQ, would it make sense to start the EQ 4 weeks sooner than the test, then run both for 10 weeks? Only bringing this up because the consensus seems to be to run EQ for a minimum of 12 weeks, and I don't want to run test for that long.
    You can,but you'd still be running a 14 week cycle no matter what.Why not run it the right way?


    ~Pinnacle~

  3. #3
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    canada
    Posts
    36
    I guess my theory was that a quicker recovery would be possible without being on the test for a full 14 weeks.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Yes,those are my legs
    Posts
    4,540
    Quote Originally Posted by thermodave
    I guess my theory was that a quicker recovery would be possible without being on the test for a full 14 weeks.
    You'll be shut down no matter what.EQ shuts you down just the same as test would.

    ~Pinnacle~

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Under A Bar
    Posts
    4,632
    Quote Originally Posted by Pinnacle
    You'll be shut down no matter what.EQ shuts you down just the same as test would.

    ~Pinnacle~

    Pinnacle
    I would like to see some proof to this.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Pissing on saluu
    Posts
    5,415
    Quote Originally Posted by thermodave
    I guess my theory was that a quicker recovery would be possible without being on the test for a full 14 weeks.
    What information are you basing your theory off of?

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    274
    well if you wanted to run them to start working together i guess you could start the EQ a little earlier, but if you wanna hit the receptors hard when theyre fresh look into frontloading.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    canada
    Posts
    36
    I've found that a shorter test cycle allows me to recover faster than a longer one. (obviously). Are you saying that a 14 week cycle with EQ would be just as hard to rebound from than a 14 week test cycle?

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Yes,those are my legs
    Posts
    4,540
    Quote Originally Posted by thermodave
    I've found that a shorter test cycle allows me to recover faster than a longer one. (obviously). Are you saying that a 14 week cycle with EQ would be just as hard to rebound from than a 14 week test cycle?
    Allow me to pose a question to you.

    Do you believe Testosterone shuts you down more than EQ?


    ~Pinnacle~

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    2,222
    Quote Originally Posted by Pinnacle
    Allow me to pose a question to you.

    Do you believe Testosterone shuts you down more than EQ?


    ~Pinnacle~
    Yes it does! In an EQ-only cycle you would still have 30-35% natrual test in you, while on a test cycle you will be completely supressed.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Pissing on saluu
    Posts
    5,415
    Quote Originally Posted by vitor
    Yes it does! In an EQ-only cycle you would still have 30-35% natrual test in you, while on a test cycle you will be completely supressed.
    Really? You know this because there are so many studies about a horse steroid used in humans?

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    2,222
    Quote Originally Posted by Mesomorphyl
    Really? You know this because there are so many studies about a horse steroid used in humans?
    A friend of mine was on a EQ-only cycle 600mgs ew, and got bloodwork after 10-weeks. hes test levels had dropped 70% from starting point, (give or take!)

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Yes,those are my legs
    Posts
    4,540
    Quote Originally Posted by vitor
    Yes it does! In an EQ-only cycle you would still have 30-35% natrual test in you, while on a test cycle you will be completely supressed.
    OK....I need to you back this up with clincal studies.I'm calling you out!!You make far too many claims with out backing anything up.



    I'LL be WAITING>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    2,222
    Quote Originally Posted by Pinnacle
    OK....I need to you back this up with clincal studies.I'm calling you out!!You make far too many claims with out backing anything up.



    I'LL be WAITING>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    I dont have clinical studies to back that up with, I made that statement from one of my frends cycles, no bullshit! You know if you go on a eq/var/primo or t-bol only you want have much testicel-shrinkage if any. Why? Because you still have some natrual test in you. Test/tren and deca are the 3-aas that will shut you down completely very fast.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Posts
    2,482
    I've never ran pct and this is my last cycle:
    6 weeks
    test - 800mg per week
    tren ace - 500mg per week
    deca - 300mg per week
    no probs

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Pissing on saluu
    Posts
    5,415
    Quote Originally Posted by mkrulic
    I've never ran pct and this is my last cycle:
    6 weeks
    test - 800mg per week
    tren ace - 500mg per week
    deca - 300mg per week
    no probs
    LMAO... What is this all about???

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Posts
    2,482
    The thread was about what shuts you down and recovery and such. I put in my two cents worth by saying I don't take anything for recovery and this is wat I'm on and I'm fine. Spend less time posting and more time reading
    Quote Originally Posted by Mesomorphyl
    LMAO... What is this all about???

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Pissing on saluu
    Posts
    5,415
    Quote Originally Posted by mkrulic
    The thread was about what shuts you down and recovery and such. I put in my two cents worth by saying I don't take anything for recovery and this is wat I'm on and I'm fine. Spend less time posting and more time reading
    So you suggest no pct??? Take your own advice buddy and read

  19. #19
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Posts
    2,482
    not suggesting no pct. I'm saying I don't use pct and I have no problems. so shut down is not a problem with me. maybe one out of 15 people I know use pct. wat I'm stating is that I observed that I and others have had no problems w/o the traditional pct.
    Quote Originally Posted by Mesomorphyl
    So you suggest no pct??? Take your own advice buddy and read

  20. #20
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    England...
    Posts
    2,832
    With EQ,Decrease HPTA function is Moderate,however,at high doses you can get shut down.

    goose4..........

  21. #21
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    274
    wow, OWNED!

  22. #22
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    canada
    Posts
    36
    Didn't intend to start a fight fella's. If I only wanted to run test for 10 weeks, what would you suggest the best way to run EQ, keeping in mind the 14 week rule(?) for maximum EQ results?

  23. #23
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Pissing on saluu
    Posts
    5,415
    Quote Originally Posted by thermodave
    Didn't intend to start a fight fella's. If I only wanted to run test for 10 weeks, what would you suggest the best way to run EQ, keeping in mind the 14 week rule(?) for maximum EQ results?
    Run test from the beginning even if at replacement doses... but you better be hitting the eq pretty good. Run the test a week longer. You can get by with 12 weeks of eq and 13 of test.

  24. #24
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    canada
    Posts
    36
    Quote Originally Posted by Mesomorphyl
    Run test from the beginning even if at replacement doses... but you better be hitting the eq pretty good. Run the test a week longer. You can get by with 12 weeks of eq and 13 of test.
    What is your theory on running test for a week longer than the EQ?

  25. #25
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Pissing on saluu
    Posts
    5,415
    Quote Originally Posted by thermodave
    What is your theory on running test for a week longer than the EQ?
    They both will clear your system at the same time so you can pct two weeks after last test injection.

  26. #26
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    canada
    Posts
    36
    Quote Originally Posted by Mesomorphyl
    They both will clear your system at the same time so you can pct two weeks after last test injection.
    Gotcha. Thanks.

  27. #27
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    BB4L!
    Posts
    10
    **I HAVE POSTED THIS DOZENS OF TIMES**
    ------------------------------------------------------------

    *NOT ALL ANDROGENS CAUSE SHUTDOWN*

    "Shutdown", is defined by a COMPLETE inhibition of the Pituitary/Testes, resulting in a TOTAL cessation of endogenous androgen production.

    SOME androgens will only SUPPRESS endogenous androgen production, resulting in a DECREASED testosterone level, but not a complete shutdown. (Tbol, Var, Wistrol, EQ, Dianabol, masteron, primo)

    Very Androgenic/Progestenic/Estrogenic steroids(Tren, Deca, Drol, Test) cause a COMPLETE shutdown of endogenous hormone production.

    The distinction between SUPRESSION and SHUTDOWN is utterly important, as steroids that cause LESS supression of endogenous hormones will allow for greater retention of gains upon ending the cycle, and a quicker, easier PCT. This is why I avoid using test in my cycles, as TEST only makes retaining gains more difficult."
    ---------------------------------------------------------
    --SIDE NOTE
    *I JUST ADDED TESTOSTERONE PROPIONATE TO MY EQ-ONLY CYCLE* (10 days ago)

    I have ran almost every compound SOLO:

    Anavar, Dianabol, Turinabol, Primobolan, Boldenone, Winstrol....

    NONE of these drugs used ALONE at MODERATE dosages caused any significant change in sexual function/libido. (Exception being Winstrol/Anavar). Upon cessation, my testosterone levels always rebounded very quickly, and I have always maintained ALL of my gains.

    This is my 1st run EVER with testosterone...Only time will tell....





    [R]
    Last edited by ROSSOSTERONE; 12-16-2005 at 01:19 PM.

  28. #28
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Yes,those are my legs
    Posts
    4,540
    Quote Originally Posted by ROSSOSTERONE

    NONE of these drugs used ALONE at MODERATE dosages caused any significant change in sexual function/libido.




    [R]
    Hi Ross..long time no see.Hope all is well.


    Bad example above Ross.Many guys have ran Deca solo and didn't have any sexual disfuction at all.They were still shut down though.same goes for recovery.Just because you can get a hard on at PCT doesn't mean you are recovered.


    ~Pinnacle~

  29. #29
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    395
    Is this the Imfamous Ross hehehehe
    You Wont be here long

  30. #30
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    BB4L!
    Posts
    10
    Pinn--

    **BLOODWORK** is what I use to determine "recovery" and "SHUTDOWN". I have bloodwoork verifying that the various drugs I listed above, ONLY REDUCE TESTOSTERONE--they do not SHUT IT OFF.

    Furthermore, sexual function/libido is an indicator of endogenous testosterone production(so long as synthetic test is not included).

    *
    Proviron (Mesterolone) doesn't shut you down at reasonable doses:

    Horm Metab Res. 1984 Sep;16(9):492-7.Related Articles, Links

    Effect of non aromatizable androgens on LHRH and TRH responses in primary testicular failure.

    Spitz IM, Margalioth EJ, Yeger Y, Livshin Y, Zylber-Haran E, Shilo S.

    We have assessed the gonadotropin, TSH and PRL responses to the non aromatizable androgens, mesterolone and fluoxymestrone, in 27 patients with primary testicular failure. All patients were given a bolus of LHRH (100 micrograms) and TRH (200 micrograms) at zero time. Nine subjects received a further bolus of TRH at 30 mins. The latter were then given mesterolone 150 mg daily for 6 weeks. The remaining subjects received fluoxymesterone 5 mg daily for 4 weeks and 10 mg daily for 2 weeks. On the last day of the androgen administration, the subjects were re-challenged with LHRH and TRH according to the identical protocol. When compared to controls, the patients had normal circulating levels of testosterone, estradiol, PRL and thyroid hormones. However, basal LH, FSH and TSH levels, as well as gonadotropin responses to LHRH and TSH and PRL responses to TRH, were increased. Mesterolone administration produced no changes in steroids, thyroid hormones, gonadotropins nor PRL. There was, however, a reduction in the integrated and incremental TSH secretion after TRH. Fluoxymesterone administration was accompanied by a reduction in thyroid binding globulin (with associated decreases in T3 and increases in T3 resin uptake). The free T4 index was unaltered, which implies that thyroid function was unchanged. In addition, during fluoxymesterone administration, there was a reduction in testosterone, gonadotropins and LH response to LHRH. Basal TSH did not vary, but there was a reduction in the peak and integrated TSH response to TRH. PRL levels were unaltered during fluoxymesterone treatment.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

  31. #31
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Yes,those are my legs
    Posts
    4,540
    [quote=ROSSOSTERONE]Pinn--

    **BLOODWORK** is what I use to determine "recovery" and "SHUTDOWN". I have bloodwoork verifying that the various drugs I listed above,



    No need for caps Ross.I can read just fine ( most days anyway ).

    Can you post up results of blood work done while running EQ alone? Also proving EQ was active in your blood at the time?

    I'm not doubting you Ross.I would like to see some documented proof though.Since there really isn't any in regards to EQ.


    THX

    ~Pinnacle~

  32. #32
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    England...
    Posts
    2,832
    ROSSOSTERONE-

    How much Decrease in HPTA function does masteron have,cheers?

    goose4.........

  33. #33
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    BB4L!
    Posts
    10
    Quote Originally Posted by goose4
    ROSSOSTERONE-

    How much Decrease in HPTA function does masteron have,cheers?

    goose4.........
    Masteron will reduce Serum-T concentrations a great deal--but not nearly as much so as Tren or Deca.

    Masteron is highly Androgenic, but is also Anti-estrogenic(possibly anti-Progestenic as well), so it can be used for longer durations without affecting the HPTA to any great degree. Combine with Winstrol. Anavar, or even Dianabol.

    Proviron, structurally related to masteron is not supressive at all, but still somewhat androgenic.

    Proviron (Mesterolone) probably doesn't shut you down at reasonable doses:

    Horm Metab Res. 1984 Sep;16(9):492-7.Related Articles, Links

    Effect of non aromatizable androgens on LHRH and TRH responses in primary testicular failure.

    Spitz IM, Margalioth EJ, Yeger Y, Livshin Y, Zylber-Haran E, Shilo S.

    We have assessed the gonadotropin, TSH and PRL responses to the non aromatizable androgens, mesterolone and fluoxymestrone, in 27 patients with primary testicular failure. All patients were given a bolus of LHRH (100 micrograms) and TRH (200 micrograms) at zero time. Nine subjects received a further bolus of TRH at 30 mins. The latter were then given mesterolone 150 mg daily for 6 weeks. The remaining subjects received fluoxymesterone 5 mg daily for 4 weeks and 10 mg daily for 2 weeks. On the last day of the androgen administration, the subjects were re-challenged with LHRH and TRH according to the identical protocol. When compared to controls, the patients had normal circulating levels of testosterone, estradiol, PRL and thyroid hormones. However, basal LH, FSH and TSH levels, as well as gonadotropin responses to LHRH and TSH and PRL responses to TRH, were increased. Mesterolone administration produced no changes in steroids, thyroid hormones, gonadotropins nor PRL. There was, however, a reduction in the integrated and incremental TSH secretion after TRH. Fluoxymesterone administration was accompanied by a reduction in thyroid binding globulin (with associated decreases in T3 and increases in T3 resin uptake). The free T4 index was unaltered, which implies that thyroid function was unchanged. In addition, during fluoxymesterone administration, there was a reduction in testosterone, gonadotropins and LH response to LHRH. Basal TSH did not vary, but there was a reduction in the peak and integrated TSH response to TRH. PRL levels were unaltered during fluoxymesterone treatment.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

  34. #34
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    BB4L!
    Posts
    10
    Pinn

    Good to see you too my bro.



    [R]

  35. #35
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Barbados
    Posts
    16,240
    hey Ross....



    -----------

    On a sidenote.

    I wonder how he gets here so fast.

    Does someone pop over to the other site and say "Hey Ross there's a thread where you can come spew your no-test stuff on AR..get over here ASAP"



    Can anyone say?

  36. #36
    I cant believe they banned him again lol..that was fast..there is no point he will be back again might as well just let him be

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •