Why the necessity for long (6 month+) runs of GH?

[vermin]

A good friend of mine used 18iu ED for 6 weeks. He gained more LBM in those 6 weeks then he has at 3iu ED for several months at a time. I"m not saying for everyone to try this but in a short time at very high doses he saw more results then he does now following the general protocol.

Yes, yes - the literature supports this in athletes! I would suspect that a PCT of GHRP or similar would be helpful after a massive dose short HGH cycle.

[*Narkissos*]

bump..

[got test?]

great post

[*Narkissos*]

wow.. thanks for the detailed reply Red

[rodge]

great response Rb as usual

-rodge

[Random]

Great post Red, answered all of my questions!.....

[Ufa]

Excellent post!

[vermin]

That's the way I read it, too. We know that short (1 month) high dose courses are effective, at least in causing an increase in LBM and that metabolic effects of HGH are measurable almost immediately.

A casual look at the literature and it seems that the overall amount of HGH delivered - in 1 or 6 months - is similar for similar effects, at least in terms of LBM increase. This is back of the envelope stuff, I have not really carefully looked that this.

[*Narkissos*]

For those with specific goals, maybe even higher dose 12-16 week. It really boils down to your specific goal for adding HGH in the first place ... and for most six months will give you what it has to offer.

Red.. define: "specific goals"; and "higher doses" in this context

Thanks