Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 41 to 80 of 125

Thread: You Wont Believe The LAB Tests on QV Gear from the 2006 Anabolics Guide!

  1. #41
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Posts
    10,714
    Quote Originally Posted by stuball
    I got the book but what does that prove they test one vial one lot # maybe 25 different brands, so if it comes back underdosed, its just that one vial, there are millions of vials and amps out their, whats bad for one might not reflect another, the only way you can tell is get it tested yourself, you could have a brand thats dosed at 100 % but some sh!thead might pull a couple of ml's out of each vial, and have hundreds of vials hes selling and replace it with piss!! Guys, sorry but buyind AS this is a crap shoot...
    Even if they test 1 vial it's from that batch number so the whole lot would be testing the same. So this is a good indicator where these companies are going with thier products.

  2. #42
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    2,720
    Thanks Cat, i didnt even realize you were talking about the anabolic 2006 book, because you said reference manual, then i looked at my book witch is 12 inches away from me, and realized that was the book, the big problem is that on this forum i had heard that a lot of employes in these pharmacys, steal vials , boxes, holograms, and make fake gear, so like i said its all a crap shoot, im on my 9th week, and have been through 5 vials, only gained 6 pounds, i know its not total sh!t but way underdosed, its mex gear, im gonna start a new thread about what i have to do, finish up or keep going , now i know why people HATE MEX GEAR !!!! Your doing a great job Cat...Thanks

  3. #43
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    2,720
    Quote Originally Posted by TheMudMan
    Even if they test 1 vial it's from that batch number so the whole lot would be testing the same. So this is a good indicator where these companies are going with thier products.
    Ok got your point, but who knows who's been f^ckin with it before it gets tested, and i do agree so do we stop using that product ????Heres one reason that i say its a crap shoot, Cat posted above, DENKAL DECA 200MG'S TESTED AT 155 DENKAL EQ 100 TESTED AT 100 DENKAL T 400 TESTED AT 302.4 DENKALTEST CYP 250 TESTED AT238 --- Pretty eratic, Thanks

  4. #44
    Not sure how testing these Mex companies and posting it does any good, they are not even in business anymore. But thanks for the info either way.
    -B D
    DO NOT ASK FOR A SOURCE, NONE SHALL BE GIVEN.
    -NO SOURCE CHECKS!-

    [email protected]
    If asking cycle advice Post up Stats/previous cycle experience/goals!

    If asking diet advice Post Stats/current diet/goals!

    “Your desire to change must be greater than your desire to stay the same.”


    I B D
    AR VET

  5. #45
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    2,720
    Quote Originally Posted by IBdmfkr
    Not sure how testing these Mex companies and posting it does any good, they are not even in business anymore. But thanks for the info either way.
    Because like myself peole still have gear, even though i feel like throwing mine out the f#ckin window..

  6. #46
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    587
    I felt like doing the same to mine. Yes, there still are TONS of vials out there in circulation. So this thread still can shed some light. Cat

  7. #47
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    2,720
    Cat check out my new thread, see if you have any input.. ( call it quits or keep moving on ? ? )

  8. #48
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Fl
    Posts
    463
    Yo CAT, does your book have numbers on individual batch numbers etc.

    If so can you tell me what my Test E looks like QVE 026 09 2007

  9. #49
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    169
    bump

  10. #50
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    2,720
    Quote Originally Posted by Natural1
    Yo CAT, does your book have numbers on individual batch numbers etc.

    If so can you tell me what my Test E looks like QVE 026 09 2007
    Is qv a ugl ??? Some body fast so i can delete soon,,,,

  11. #51
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    2,720
    Quote Originally Posted by Natural1
    Yo CAT, does your book have numbers on individual batch numbers etc.

    If so can you tell me what my Test E looks like QVE 026 09 2007
    How many mgs200 ? ??

  12. #52
    Quote Originally Posted by stuball
    Is qv a ugl ??? Some body fast so i can delete soon,,,,
    nope
    -B D
    DO NOT ASK FOR A SOURCE, NONE SHALL BE GIVEN.
    -NO SOURCE CHECKS!-

    [email protected]
    If asking cycle advice Post up Stats/previous cycle experience/goals!

    If asking diet advice Post Stats/current diet/goals!

    “Your desire to change must be greater than your desire to stay the same.”


    I B D
    AR VET

  13. #53
    test e is terreible my good you thin your taking 750mgs and you will be taking 450mg only my good thats very bad!!!!!!!! i was that some one will test scering testosterone entante!!!!!!!!

  14. #54
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    2,720
    Quote Originally Posted by arnold_of_malta
    test e is terreible my good you thin your taking 750mgs and you will be taking 450mg only my good thats very bad!!!!!!!! i was that some one will test scering testosterone entante!!!!!!!!
    If your refering to me Its underdosed from 350mg to 212mg so doing 1.5ml 525 mgs is most likley a little over 300mgs, if it underdosed,,,

  15. #55
    i asked if anyone did and test on test e made my scering of germany??????????? or deca or sustinol made by organon of pakistan???????

  16. #56
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Barbados
    Posts
    16,240
    Quote Originally Posted by IBdmfkr
    Not sure how testing these Mex companies and posting it does any good, they are not even in business anymore. But thanks for the info either way.
    I think the info has merit.

    It can help those who currently have the aforementioned gear in their possession to make adjustments to their dosing regime. Frankly put, when the companies went down a lot of guys stocked up... so yea the information has merit from this perspective...

  17. #57
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Posts
    10,714
    Quote Originally Posted by stuball
    Ok got your point, but who knows who's been f^ckin with it before it gets tested, and i do agree so do we stop using that product ????Heres one reason that i say its a crap shoot, Cat posted above, DENKAL DECA 200MG'S TESTED AT 155 DENKAL EQ 100 TESTED AT 100 DENKAL T 400 TESTED AT 302.4 DENKALTEST CYP 250 TESTED AT238 --- Pretty eratic, Thanks
    Well, I would hope the authors or whoever funded the book that information is comming from is using a reputable, and unbais lab to have the products tested.

    These erratic dosage numbers we are seeing is what you will get with most Vet labs and UG's. The Vet labs are not under the same microscope that the pharmaceutical labs that make human grade steroids are........ and then the UGL's are on thier own.

    But I see what you are saying.

  18. #58
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    2,720
    The research was done by William Llewellyn the lab was not posted but it does say company nam Molecular Nutrition, but i think that his company, if you need to know it has the instrumental conditions. Chromatograph: high performance liquid chromatograph ( hewleii packard model 1090 II/L COLUMN:synergi hydro-rp,150+ 3.0mm4 um 80A DETECTOR hotodiode array scanning from 190 to 600 nm quantiyation at 280nm iF that helps

  19. #59
    I think we all underestimated good ol BROVEL

  20. #60
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    2,720
    Or even thet t 400 tested at 302,4 is not to bad

  21. #61
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    587
    Quote Originally Posted by Narkissos
    I think the info has merit.

    It can help those who currently have the aforementioned gear in their possession to make adjustments to their dosing regime. Frankly put, when the companies went down a lot of guys stocked up... so yea the information has merit from this perspective...
    Very good point and an all to familiar one from this vantage point (not that I have any gear stocked up). I know MANY people who ran and stocked up on QV when they heard it went under. Now QV's stock is plummeting again due to this info. But again, not all of the gear is bad. Seems to be going the way of Ttokkyo.
    Last edited by CatGrabber; 04-15-2006 at 12:04 AM.

  22. #62
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    587
    Quote Originally Posted by stuball
    The research was done by William Llewellyn the lab was not posted but it does say company nam Molecular Nutrition, but i think that his company, if you need to know it has the instrumental conditions. Chromatograph: high performance liquid chromatograph ( hewleii packard model 1090 II/L COLUMN:synergi hydro-rp,150+ 3.0mm4 um 80A DETECTOR hotodiode array scanning from 190 to 600 nm quantiyation at 280nm iF that helps
    100% correct and exactly my words! LOL

  23. #63
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    East Coast
    Posts
    4,561
    hey bro did it mention denkalls liquid dbol 25mgs/ml..?? just curious because whatever teh dosage was i loved it..

  24. #64
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    587
    TIME FOR SOME MORE LAB RESULTS!

    OK, this thread will be for RANDOM companies. If I post an UG lab, please forgive me as Im doing my best to assertain what is what. Im pretty sure I have them down pat though.

    FORT DODGE EQ 50mgs tested at 53.9mgs

    Loeffler Sust 250mgs tested at 209mgs
    The next batch # 5637L Tested at 180mgs

    **** Test Cyp 250mgs tested 192mgs

    Aburihah Test Ennathate 250mgs tested 163mgs

    NORMA Test Enanthate 250mgs tested 278mgs!

    ****Test Prop 100mgs tested at 92mgs

    Hope this helps, Cat
    Last edited by abstrack; 04-16-2006 at 06:44 PM.

  25. #65
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    587
    Quote Originally Posted by arnold_of_malta
    i asked if anyone did and test on test e made my scering of germany??????????? or deca or sustinol made by organon of pakistan???????
    All I have from ORGANON is the DECA that tested 56.1mgs out of 50mgs. Very good. ORGANON seems to be very good overall but has been counterfitted MANY MANY times over. Organon Sust 250 has been counterfitted more times than any other gear IMO. I may be way off on this but It seem to be the case from what I have seen in the Streets. MAKE SURE your sust is real bro. Post a good pic for the bros to look at in the STEROID PICS section. Cat

  26. #66
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    587
    Quote Originally Posted by Natural1
    Yo CAT, does your book have numbers on individual batch numbers etc.

    If so can you tell me what my Test E looks like QVE 026 09 2007
    The batch tested was from lot number 029. I cannot tell you if this is good or bad my friend. Well, its good in the sence you KNOW your gear is not the one mentioned but again it could be worse. Its a crap shoot. I just KNOW QV does NOT give me what it used to. The pumps, the hardness, all gone compared to before. Cat
    Last edited by CatGrabber; 04-15-2006 at 11:55 AM.

  27. #67
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    587
    Quote Originally Posted by anaBROLIC
    hey bro did it mention denkalls liquid dbol 25mgs/ml..?? just curious because whatever teh dosage was i loved it..
    Sorry bro, no results for that. Cat

  28. #68
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    2,720
    Hey Cat check out page a-45, has a picture of syd group suprimo 100 But under it it says Methenolone enanthate By onother company

  29. #69
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    East Coast
    Posts
    4,561
    Quote Originally Posted by CatGrabber
    Sorry bro, no results for that. Cat
    damn it cat your good for nothing. can i get a mod to delete this thread??



    lol jk.. thread is great.

  30. #70
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    St. Paul, MN
    Posts
    1,475
    good info! i always knew QV was crap. unfortunately all i could obtain. i'm never dealing with mexicans again.

  31. #71
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Mass
    Posts
    482
    LEts hope and pray this doesnt get deleted. AGAIN!

  32. #72
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Gym
    Posts
    131
    Cat Would you mind putting up some Lab results for S*** group EQ? And is ...........UGL.........***2500 have lab results. Thanks buddy Great Thread
    Last edited by abstrack; 04-16-2006 at 06:46 PM.

  33. #73
    no mate my organon deca is 100mgs not 50mgs did you mke a test on scering testosterone e????

  34. #74
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Anywhere...
    Posts
    15,725
    Any results for Test Enan, Schering?

  35. #75
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    587
    Quote Originally Posted by anaBROLIC
    damn it cat your good for nothing. can i get a mod to delete this thread??



    lol jk.. thread is great.
    LOL...TYTY....I wish they had a lot more test results but it does show what companies truly care. Bottol line is MEX companies are pretty much a crap shoot. We all knew this regardless but Im sure most of you will look at your MEX gear with a whole new opinion now. Cat

  36. #76
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    587
    Quote Originally Posted by Swifto
    Any results for Test Enan, Schering?
    Yes. Test 250mgs tested at a mere 36.5mgs per ML!!!!!!!



    JUST KIDDING BRO. LOL . No results for that one and Im suprized. It a big CO. Cat

  37. #77
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Anywhere...
    Posts
    15,725
    Quote Originally Posted by CatGrabber
    Yes. Test 250mgs tested at a mere 36.5mgs per ML!!!!!!!



    JUST KIDDING BRO. LOL . No results for that one and Im suprized. It a big CO. Cat
    F*cking H*ll! You got me for a minute.

    Ok, no worries. I woulod think its pretty well dosed though, would you agree?

  38. #78
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    587
    Quote Originally Posted by Swifto
    F*cking H*ll! You got me for a minute.

    Ok, no worries. I woulod think its pretty well dosed though, would you agree?
    Yes, IMO i think it would be. Robert

  39. #79
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Gym
    Posts
    131
    Cat, can you check you PM got a question for ya

  40. #80
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    1,699
    rumor has it that they were making low quality gear on purpose so people would by from 1 of there other 3 comp that they own look into it u will see there is truth behind it.an i thought ii herd that gaspari nut was involed some how.key word herd, dont hold me to that the gaspari thing anyway
    Last edited by pumpd4lif; 04-15-2006 at 07:30 PM.

Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •