Where did the theory of only running masteron @ a low BF % come from ?

[guest589745]

i guess im not really sure where this thread is goin???

I guess nowhere maybe because the theory is basically untrue.

??

[guest589745]

powerlifters appreciate the strength gains from steroids, and most of them are Fat as Fvck!

CD

Ok I gotcha, but how does masteron fit into this example ?

[Random]

Well masteron is DHT and a higher androgen then its ratio would portray it, i got very strong on it at a low dose too, and being DHT with a moderate binding to the AR helps this drug to aid in fatloss...

[Random]

Isn't it hard to appreciate ANY steroids effects with too much bodyfat ?

My point was that No its not hard to appreciate benefits (using powerlifters as example)---since they go for strength only--and masteron promotes great strength!

CD

[Random]

The point is, i can run anything at a low or high BF, it all depends on your goals to choose what benefits you want out of which steroids...

CD

[guest589745]

The point is, i can run anything at a low or high BF, it all depends on your goals to choose what benefits you want out of which steroids...

CD

Yea exactly.

[Logan13]

How exactly, is masteron "More of a "cutter" " ? How does it work in a way that it mostly (Only ?) causes fat loss (Or muscle "hardness") ?

I call it a cutter drug not only because of it's effects on the body (vascularity, hardness, fat-loss) but also because of the large amounts that you would have to inject to achieve mass. Similar to winstrol and primo, IMO. Mass drugs typically have the effect of making the body hold water and increasing estrogen production, which IMO again, is the enviroment needed to achieve a large amount of mass. I have gained mass over the years using mostly cutter drugs (prop, var, mast, EQ(both a cutter and bulker), proviron, t-bol). But no where near the rate that I would have if I had used deca, d-bol, anabol, etc.... I am just too vain to look that way, so I opt for the slow-steady muscle building programs.

[goose]

I call it a cutter drug not only because of it's effects on the body (vascularity, hardness, fat-loss) but also because of the large amounts that you would have to inject to achieve mass. Similar to winstrol and primo, IMO. Mass drugs typically have the effect of making the body hold water and increasing estrogen production, which IMO again, is the enviroment needed to achieve a large amount of mass. I have gained mass over the years using mostly cutter drugs (prop, var, mast, EQ(both a cutter and bulker), proviron, t-bol). But no where near the rate that I would have if I had used deca, d-bol, anabol, etc.... I am just too vain to look that way, so I opt for the slow-steady muscle building programs.

Great post.You Echo alot of my thoughts.It`s funney the weak drugs build the most muscle.You should not use AAS if your over 15% unless your a power athlete or something.Masteron can be used by anyone,the Difference is if you use masteron with double digit bf% you will not get the decisive factor between a smooth, flat muscle or a hard and ripped look.Although masteron is not highly active in muscle tissue, the 2 alkylation present on drostanolone considerably intensifies its anabolic effect. It can therefore be used somewhat effectively as bulking agent, providing a consistent gain of high quality muscle mass,my next cycle is a bulker with masteron,it`s all in the diet,but I`m happy with a 4-5 pound gain.