So I guess my car is intoxicating, when I drive it at high speeds and get an adrenaline rush and feel awesome. Jeez, i'm a recreational speeder! I gotta get myself to speeders anonymous.
Sorry mate,
Wasn't trying to single you out. I'll give you my opinion, and it's just that. You can take it up with admin if you like, and if you do, no hard feelings by me.
but here's my opinion. Federal law prohibits the use of marijuana. Until that law changes, it really doesn't matter what the state laws stipulate. for example, my home state, california, is at odds with the federal law. medical marijuana is legal, and we actually have clinics and places you can go to buy/smoke. But, from time to time, the feds will raid these places and shut them down. so for now, I'd suggest we abide by federal laws/guidelines to avoid any risk of exposure to this board and it's owners.
Euphoria:
is medically recognized as a mental and emotional condition in which a person experiences intense feelings of well-being, elation, happiness, excitement, and joy. Technically, euphoria is an affect, but the term is often colloquially used to define emotion as an intense state of transcendent happiness combined with an overwhelming sense of contentment. It has also been defined as an "affective state of exaggerated well-being or elation." The word derives from Greek εὐφορία, "power of enduring easily, fertility".
again, this is simply my opinion, but i think it's a solid one. i think it's very difficult to disprove that aas creates an intoxication and euphoria in most individuals. and it's this/these residual feelings that many users look forward too.
I am inclined to agree. The majority of "card bearing" individuals have solicited these cards solely for recreational purposes, not medicinal. Although I treat many terminally ill patients who swear by the benefits (increased appetite, lower blood pressure, nausea control, etc.) of the substance referenced here, many in the medical community still question the validity and utility of the substance and most of my colleagues will not condone or prescribe the substance. Those that chose to use the substance often do so outside the blessing of their PCP.
Ink, when you get a sec, i would be interested to know your opinion on my pov, professionally or otherwise. thanks.
Ok. Will do. Driving to my next clinic. Will get back to you on this!Originally Posted by MickeyKnox
adreneline junkieOriginally Posted by Atomini
you can be addicted to adreneline, not adreneline itself but the escape from reality, similar with gambling, even fighting, fvcking, base jumps, irrational behaviour even training for some people
people use drugs to escape reality, different ways but same end result
rehab 101
Hey Mickey!Originally Posted by MickeyKnox
So DanB is on to something. In medicine, we define recreational use of any substances as the unsupervised/unprescribed use of any substance for the explicit purpose of inducing a change in a state of consciousness. The changed state of consciousness can be relaxation, arousal, euphoria or altered perceptions (e.g. Increased awareness or hallucinations), etc. If we limit the discussion for a moment to this singular definition, we would hence ask, are steroids taken without medical supervision (the answer can be yes, no, or both), and are they taken to alter a state of consciousness? Under the latter pretense, I would say, no, rarely (if ever) are steroids taken to alter one's conscious mind.
Now I don't disagree with you. While most people using anabolics are likely doing so for health benefits and muscle gain, some do select steroids to improve vitality, mood, sex drive, general well being, etc. to which I'd categorize as health benefits. Sure, improving your mood, energy, sex drive, etc is likely going to create a better state of mind or euphoria but this euphoric sense is a benefit or secondary outcome of steroids - i.e. having more energy and a better sex drive would make most people euphoric I suspect.
Would I classify steroids as recreational? Yes when it's in a nonprescribed setting. Would I categorize it in the same way as the other recreational compounds referenced in this thread? Based on the above definition, certainly not. Does that mean that steroid use is safe and always justified, heck no....but I'm not about to condemn their use either because they do offer numerous benefits despite their bad reputation.
Ok....now back to you for your thoughts!
Oh absolutely. By the definition I cited, the vast majority of users are recreational. Heck many guys on HRT even stack their therapies with non prescribed AAS. Toxicities. Certainly, but again I doubt few use with the intent of changing their conscious state of mind.Originally Posted by MickeyKnox
![]()
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)