Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 81 to 120 of 120

Thread: synthetic car oils

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Addison, TX
    Posts
    520
    Quote Originally Posted by DanDoola
    Power to weight ratio is what's important. At 240 crank, I'm assuming you're putting down about 210 to the ground. This works out to roughly 13.3 lbs/hp

    A Fat, American V8 putting 300 hp to the ground has a power to weight ratio of 11.3 lbs/hp.

    And for those post clen/T3 American V8's (namely vettes), their power to weight ratio is about 9.2 lbs/hp And I'm not talking about the new C6's or a Z06, I'm talkin' C5.
    The S2000 puts down about 205 at the rear wheels. So weighing in at 2800lbs, that puts its power to weight ratio at 13.66lb/hp

    The Camaro SS weighs 3553.9 lbs (just googled it). If it were to get 300 to the ground (which I highly doubt), it's power to weight ratio would be 11.85.

    But let's use his numbers for parasitic drivetrain losses. 325hp with 12% loss makes it to 286hp to the wheels. That means it would have a more realistic power to weight ratio of 12.43lb/hp.

    Does that spell out a huge loss and him "wiping his ass with my car"?

    Nope.

    In all actuality, the SS and the WS6 will beat an S2000 any day of the week. But the stock Z28, Firebird (V8), and the Mustang GT are dead evven races with the S2000. And they all have V8's. That is what I think is pathetic.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    FL
    Posts
    6,265
    I've a 68 vette.......350, roller rocker, two holly DP'ers (850's) tunnel ram intake....had to put a franklin 10" rear end on her....kept twisting the u-bolts. I'm thinking of getting a roots blower for her....just for giggles.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Addison, TX
    Posts
    520
    Quote Originally Posted by Juggernaut
    I've a 68 vette.......350, roller rocker, two holly DP'ers (850's) tunnel ram intake....had to put a franklin 10" rear end on her....kept twisting the u-bolts. I'm thinking of getting a roots blower for her....just for giggles.
    ****, that would be a beast. I'd like to get a '69 to early 70's Camaro and install a blown engine. Maybe one day.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    HEELS 2005!!
    Posts
    3,590
    note to thieves, leave the cd player please! take everything else

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    FL
    Posts
    6,265
    Quote Originally Posted by 9000rpm
    ****, that would be a beast. I'd like to get a '69 to early 70's Camaro and install a blown engine. Maybe one day.
    I've a close friend that has a 69 maro.......that freakin car is B.A.D. assed. The engine in that thing is tight......has a high pitched metalic sound to it....when you can hear it over the thundering pipes. Out of the hole you can't reach the dashboard from the g's. hahahahaha

    Mine is not that tight but she holds her own.....he beat me by three cars last time we raced....****er.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Posts
    1,381
    9000rpm, you gotta remember too that the LS1 engine in the SS wasnt designed to be at the peak of its performance coming out of the factory like the S2K motor was. YOu yourself said they were some of the best flowing heads ever made.

    The LS1, and any v8 for that matter, is way detuned for insurance, emissions, etc. If GM wanted, and they have actually, they could throw a few camaros out of the factory that have 700+ hp n/a. Its been done, but in limited numbers, and they sell for a ****load of money.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Canada eh
    Posts
    7,073
    Quote Originally Posted by Hed
    9000rpm, you gotta remember too that the LS1 engine in the SS wasnt designed to be at the peak of its performance coming out of the factory like the S2K motor was. YOu yourself said they were some of the best flowing heads ever made.

    The LS1, and any v8 for that matter, is way detuned for insurance, emissions, etc. If GM wanted, and they have actually, they could throw a few camaros out of the factory that have 700+ hp n/a. Its been done, but in limited numbers, and they sell for a ****load of money.
    Exactly.. for around 1500-2000 dollars I can up my camaro more then 100 hp.. and lets not forget handling...unless you've driven a camaro, you going to be very suprised in how they handle

  8. #8
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Addison, TX
    Posts
    520
    Quote Originally Posted by needmorestrength
    Exactly.. for around 1500-2000 dollars I can up my camaro more then 100 hp.. and lets not forget handling...unless you've driven a camaro, you going to be very suprised in how they handle
    The same can be said for the S2000. The vortech kit can be had for about $2500 if you look in the right places.

    And I have driven Cameros before. It's not far from driving a truck around corners. They have tons of body roll.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Canada eh
    Posts
    7,073
    Quote Originally Posted by 9000rpm
    The same can be said for the S2000. The vortech kit can be had for about $2500 if you look in the right places.

    And I have driven Cameros before. It's not far from driving a truck around corners. They have tons of body roll.
    are you serious? to each their own I suppose but with the F frame they handling it great for a v8! If I am to spend the money on a super or turbo charger its going to be after everything else is done, why have forced induction when there is no need?

  10. #10
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Addison, TX
    Posts
    520
    Quote Originally Posted by needmorestrength
    are you serious? to each their own I suppose but with the F frame they handling it great for a v8! If I am to spend the money on a super or turbo charger its going to be after everything else is done, why have forced induction when there is no need?
    Have you ever driven an S2000 on a course? It is like driving a gocart. You point it and it goes there.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Addison, TX
    Posts
    520
    Quote Originally Posted by Hed
    9000rpm, you gotta remember too that the LS1 engine in the SS wasnt designed to be at the peak of its performance coming out of the factory like the S2K motor was. YOu yourself said they were some of the best flowing heads ever made.

    The LS1, and any v8 for that matter, is way detuned for insurance, emissions, etc. If GM wanted, and they have actually, they could throw a few camaros out of the factory that have 700+ hp n/a. Its been done, but in limited numbers, and they sell for a ****load of money.
    Oh I totally agree. But bone stock, they are very far from anything impressive at all. The torque is great, but that's it.

    The F20C is almost at it's peak from the factory. That highest NA S2000 I've heard of is around 250hp at the wheels. Now the supercharged S2000's put down 300 to 310hp to the wheels with no other mods but the blower. I know of about 4 or 5 supercharged S2000's with around 400 to 425hp after more head work and other mods such as a piggy back ecu, exhaust, etc.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Toronto 5days Miami 2days
    Posts
    710
    I dont what to get into a arguement with you but the s2000 is $33000 with 162 Pounds of torque, the mustang gt is $24500 with 320 pounds of torque. Also at what RPM do you have to rev your motor to get that 205 hp in your car almost 6000rpm. Meanwhile the mustang reaches its power at 3400 rpm. On top of that you have a additional $9000 dollars to play with the car. You can get a supercharger, suspension, brakes, skirts etc with that much upgrade. I know you like your car and when someone affends its you jump up to defend it but everyone likes differnet things. Just remeber this, horsepower is what sells the car but torque is what wins the race.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Canada eh
    Posts
    7,073
    Quote Originally Posted by Sta11ion
    I dont what to get into a arguement with you but the s2000 is $33000 with 162 Pounds of torque, the mustang gt is $24500 with 320 pounds of torque. Also at what RPM do you have to rev your motor to get that 205 hp in your car almost 6000rpm. Meanwhile the mustang reaches its power at 3400 rpm. On top of that you have a additional $9000 dollars to play with the car. You can get a supercharger, suspension, brakes, skirts etc with that much upgrade. I know you like your car and when someone affends its you jump up to defend it but everyone likes differnet things. Just remeber this, horsepower is what sells the car but torque is what wins the race.
    yup

  14. #14
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Addison, TX
    Posts
    520
    Quote Originally Posted by Sta11ion
    I dont what to get into a arguement with you but the s2000 is $33000 with 162 Pounds of torque, the mustang gt is $24500 with 320 pounds of torque. Also at what RPM do you have to rev your motor to get that 205 hp in your car almost 6000rpm. Meanwhile the mustang reaches its power at 3400 rpm. On top of that you have a additional $9000 dollars to play with the car. You can get a supercharger, suspension, brakes, skirts etc with that much upgrade. I know you like your car and when someone affends its you jump up to defend it but everyone likes differnet things. Just remeber this, horsepower is what sells the car but torque is what wins the race.
    I agree with you that everyone likes different things. And yes, if you are a car nut as I am, if someone talks smack about your car, you defend it as if it were your children.

    The S2000 is pricy, but your are buying a track ready race car out of the box. The Mustang GT is ready to drive fast in a straight line out of the box. The mustang can be modified to handle very well, but it will never be on par with the S2000 in handling unless you completely rebuild the chasis. By then it is pretty much a custom built car and not a Mustang anymore.

    Now the new mustang I think will handle very well. It's chasis is based upon the same as the Lincoln LS. And the LS is a great handling car for its size. It even handles better than the BMW 5 series cars.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Posts
    1,381
    My 4th gen fbody handles absolutely amazing. The S2000 does handle slightly better, but my car does handle like an absolute champion. After seeing all the **** suspension under the car, i know why......

  16. #16
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Addison, TX
    Posts
    520
    BTW, that new Z06 that will be out soon is going to be crazy! 500hp and 500ftlb torque NA!!!!!!!! That thing will be beating up on Vipers.

    I will own one some day.

  17. #17
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Addison, TX
    Posts
    520
    Quote Originally Posted by gsxxr
    i have one in my shop right now. we are making a blower kit for it along with a water injection system for intercooling
    Are you talking about the new C6 Z06 that isn't even out yet? Or the C5 Z06?

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Posts
    1,381
    gsxxr, im callin BS on this one. if you can give me a pic of this new C6 ZO6 with a sign that says like "ar" in the picture or something like that, ill believe you........and then probably find where you live, and pray in your direction every night, like mecca.

    that handbuilt 427 is something that is in my dreams at night. i cant even wait to hear one with exhaust........

    but i want a pic, just one, or some kind of proof.

  19. #19
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    14,421
    Quote Originally Posted by Hed
    gsxxr, im callin BS on this one. if you can give me a pic of this new C6 ZO6 with a sign that says like "ar" in the picture or something like that, ill believe you........and then probably find where you live, and pray in your direction every night, like mecca.

    that handbuilt 427 is something that is in my dreams at night. i cant even wait to hear one with exhaust........

    but i want a pic, just one, or some kind of proof.
    there is no need for me to Bull Sh-it

  20. #20
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    14,421
    Bro I wish I could do that. The only time we can do pics are after the car is released to the public. Trust me when the car is done and you see a 750hp monster you will sh-it. Let’s put it this way we are the ones that helped Callaway build his twin turbo and also the ones that supercharged his c12 along with Rick Moroso personnel vette.

    start to do you searching

  21. #21
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    14,421
    This is a dyno sheet of an ls1 with a stock motor that I built. And rember this is rear wheel hp with pumped gas...

  22. #22
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Canada eh
    Posts
    7,073
    Quote Originally Posted by gsxxr
    This is a dyno sheet of an ls1 with a stock motor that I built. And rember this is rear wheel hp with pumped gas...
    What exactly did you do to the engine? lol give me some ideas

  23. #23
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Addison, TX
    Posts
    520
    Quote Originally Posted by gsxxr
    This is a dyno sheet of an ls1 with a stock motor that I built. And rember this is rear wheel hp with pumped gas...
    That's not a stock LS1. That motor definetely has some work done to it.

    I won't all out call BS on you about the new Z06, but I do have my doubts. I'm sure you can understand.

    But let me ask you this. Why the hell does GM continue to insist on using leaf springs in the rear of the vette? That just seems old and ghetto to me. Now they are at least some sort of composite, but come on. This is 2005, why would they not go with coils all the way around like other high performance cars?

    But I do have to admit, the car still handles like a Ferrari on a track.

  24. #24
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    14,421
    Quote Originally Posted by 9000rpm
    That's not a stock LS1. That motor definetely has some work done to it.

    I won't all out call BS on you about the new Z06, but I do have my doubts. I'm sure you can understand.

    But let me ask you this. Why the hell does GM continue to insist on using leaf springs in the rear of the vette? That just seems old and ghetto to me. Now they are at least some sort of composite, but come on. This is 2005, why would they not go with coils all the way around like other high performance cars?

    But I do have to admit, the car still handles like a Ferrari on a track.
    sorry i might not have made this clear. the motor is stock but it has my supercharging system fuel system and with water injection intercooling also full exhaust. this dyno run was at 16psi i.a.t 230. if the dyno fan was not broke and i got the i.a.t down to 160 0r 150 it would have made like 540hp

    on the cars we do motor work i make over 675hp at the wheel

  25. #25
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Addison, TX
    Posts
    520
    Quote Originally Posted by gsxxr
    sorry i might not have made this clear. the motor is stock but it has my supercharging system fuel system and with water injection intercooling also full exhaust. this dyno run was at 16psi i.a.t 230. if the dyno fan was not broke and i got the i.a.t down to 160 0r 150 it would have made like 540hp

    on the cars we do motor work i make over 675hp at the wheel
    That's pretty good. But a turbocharged S2000 with a motor with lower compression pistons (9.5:1), makes from 400rwhp to 600rwhp at 18 to 21psi.

    Here is they guy that I was talking about that has gotten the highest hp yet that I know of. This is his dyno of his car making 559rwhp at 19 or 20psi. And he's also over 300ftlb's of torque.

    http://chrisdrivesafastcar.com/gallery-view.php?ID=128

    He is supposedly building a new turbo system for his car and he's aiming for 700+rwhp.

    Now keep in mind this is a 2.0 liter 4 banger.

  26. #26
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    14,421
    We are specializing in supercharging and turbo charging systems. We also manufacture supplemental fuel and water injection systems. Along with that we build high performance engines and custom suspensions. We do majority domestic cars and trucks but have done quit a bit of imports. My personnel hobby is sport bikes.

  27. #27
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Posts
    1,381
    huge HP jump....

    gsxxr, ever hear of the guy who has the 9 second daily driven turbo LS1 trans am?

  28. #28
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    14,421
    the only ta i know if that runs in the 9s is some guy with a twin turbo making like 1000hp
    but it does not run on pumped gas.

  29. #29
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    14,421
    The leaf springs cheep and light. If you adjust the leaf it can work real nice for on the street. If you are running the car on a track its batter to have coil over shock and springs. You have to remember most of the cars that roll off the show room floor are not race.

  30. #30
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Addison, TX
    Posts
    520
    Quote Originally Posted by gsxxr
    You have to remember most of the cars that roll off the show room floor are not race.
    Yes I know, this is the only thing I HATE about corvettes. Most owners are in their late 40's or 50's and are not interested in road racing or auto cross what so ever.

    It is definetely a shame for such a great car to go to waste.

  31. #31
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    2,592
    I have done studies at work and Reseached the Oils and Mobile-1 is the best.

    That is all I will run im my cars after I got done finishing the tests.

    Amsoil is also good but not as good as Mobile-1

  32. #32
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    14,421
    I have built a lot of performance motors making 500hp and more. In my cars I take out the motors and refresh them every 2 years. I have run Mobil 1, red line; Amsoil, Royal Purple and Agip oil’s all were full synthetic oils. After looking at the cylinder walls cams and bearing along with the valve stems and seals the Agip oil’s worked the best by far. You can see that the bearing have less wear and scoring and spotting. The cylinder walls still have hatch marks for honing and the seals were not weeping at all. I feel this is the best info on this subject that you are going to get. I also forgot the mention that the superchargers are feed by the engine oils as well. When you take a blower apart that has been spinning at 60,000 rpm for 2 years and see no wear on the gears and carbon seals that is impressive. You also have to take into consideration how the oils will vaporize. You need to look in the intake manifolds and check the pcv valve. This is a big part of making power. If you have to much oil vapors going in the pcv valve due to blow by you will loose a lot of power. Also you will start to see the oil on your spark plugs.
    Last edited by G-1000; 02-08-2005 at 12:19 PM.

  33. #33
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    36
    Quote Originally Posted by gsxxr
    yes i know we get cars from Gm 6 month to a 1.5 years befor so we can start R&D.
    That must be torture trying to keep all that new car info on the hush, hush. Although if I had a job like that, I wouldn't spill my guts in a Vietnamese torture camp.

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •