Ortiz is a good wrestler, yes, but that's it. I saw a fight between Liddel and him the other night, and he got his asss beat with the quickness. If Liddel can knock him out that easily, Lee would knock his fukking
head off in no time.
Based on that fight alone here's three FACTS for you:
1. Ortiz's only offense is wrestling. He would never be able to get a hold of Lee.(yeah, he may be able to knock a reg. guy out, but he would have no striking ability against Lee.) THAT IS A FACT.
2. Ortiz's only defense is wrestling.(yeah, he may be able to defend strikes from a reg. guy, but he can't defend himself against Liddel's 1st attempt to "flurry", so we know that he would have no chance of blocking Lee's lightning fast kicks/punches that a reel to reel camera couldn't even catch) THAT IS A FACT.
3. Since Ortiz's only form of
offense and defence would be rendered completely useless, Bruce Lee would annihilate Tito Ortiz. Not only that, he would do it in record time. Wing Chun is one of, if not
the fastest martial art because another principal of Wing Chun is defensive offense. One strike or attempt from Ortiz, and BLAMO, he would be out! THAT IS A FACT.
The
only argument that could be posed favoring Ortiz over Bruce Lee would be size. I'm not saying size doesn't matter, because it does. But the foundation of Lee's martial arts is Wing Chun, which was designed to utilize every last bit of energy from one's body. It was invented by a woman, for the purpose of being an equalizer in this respect(size). This is what allowed Lee to perform all the incredible things cited by others earlier in this thread. My point is that Orti
z would not be able to use his full power potential, as Bruce Lee would. Hence, size would not be a factor in this particular fight. I could write a book about it.
