Anabolic Member
I knew it was a trick question, because they are ALL not,Originally Posted by Hazard
It's not google foundIt was a trick question......
Answer..... Actually they aren't, its just that the eigenstates are circularly polarized. A photon can have any polarization since it can be in a superposition of the two eigenstates.
~Haz~.
Oh do you actually have the eigen values of photon quantum mechanics??
I would love them please!!!
AR-Elite Hall of Famer
I'm going to have to answer this one soon because I have to leave shortly and don't want to leave anyone hangin......
~Haz~
Anabolic Member
done. above.
Snook~ AR Lounge Monitor
If you blow a guy but dont like it are you still gay ?
Did i get your question right haz ?
Productive Member
[QUOTE=DSM4Life;5239943]If you blow a guy but dont like it are you still gay ?
Only if you swap spit right after blowing him.
Anabolic Member
Can you guys stop googling things and then posting them to compare my answer with the googled on you got.
I would like people to post serious questions here, test my knowledge with serious question, not because you want to try undermine me. Ask me your homework questions, things you have always wondered about the universe, etc etc.
Ask me real questions, don't toy with me.
Productive Member
Why have we not found any life outside our own little corner of the universe.Can you guys stop googling things and then posting them to compare my answer with the googled on you got.
I would like people to post serious questions here, test my knowledge with serious question, not because you want to try undermine me. Ask me your homework questions, things you have always wondered about the universe, etc etc.
Ask me real questions, don't toy with me.
After all the universe is vast but we have the "Hubble Telescope". Or, have we actually known about other intelligence, but due to fears, ie public panic,
The government keeps a lid on it? Surely there is more going on up above the clark belt than we are led to believe. Especially with the manned spacestation and the constant shuttle flights. Those guys would have had to see something by now. I know your answers would probably be based on conjecture, but hey go for it.
Anabolic Member
If we have, it has been kept secret. I highly doubt we have however. I do believe, without a doubt that there is life beyond our galaxy. They may not be more advanced then us, but then again they may. To believe, that in this ‘endless’ universe with billions of galaxy’s, and unfathomable amount of stars, and hence orbiting planets that there is no other life. But because it’s a trillion light years away from us, doesn’t mean there could not be a planet just like ours. Remember when we look at a star that is 1000 light years away from earth, we are looking at it from 1000 years ago into the past, not how it looks now.
'everything louder than everything else'
now rosie, have common sense here, if the majority of us arent versed in what you are studying/have studied, how can we present questions if we dont know the answers ourselves?Can you guys stop googling things and then posting them to compare my answer with the googled on you got.
I would like people to post serious questions here, test my knowledge with serious question, not because you want to try undermine me. Ask me your homework questions, things you have always wondered about the universe, etc etc.
Ask me real questions, don't toy with me.
Anabolic Member
Actually the large majority of people i have befriended on this forum do have or are currently undertaking some form of higher degree education. I have already had people ask me question on their college/Univeristy homework. Its fun to try have a go at them. You don't have to be studying what i am to ask me questions on your own field of knowledge.now rosie, have common sense here, if the majority of us arent versed in what you are studying/have studied, how can we present questions if we don't know the answers ourselves?
I was just hoping to get more serious questions... i think i was dreaming.
'everything louder than everything else'
ive a sport science degree but you rejected my question as not 'fitt' (get the pun? lol) for science, you swine!Actually the large majority of people i have befriended on this forum do have or are currently undertaking some form of higher degree education. I have already had people ask me question on their college/Univeristy homework. Its fun to try have a go at them. You don't have to be studying what i am to ask me questions on your own field of knowledge.
I was just hoping to get more serious questions... i think i was dreaming.
Anabolic Member
ive a sport science degree but you rejected my question as not 'fitt' (get the pun? lol) for science, you swine!
Hell yes it is science! But not what I am here for! I love maths, throw me a maths question.
Knowledgeable Member
Can you guys stop googling things and then posting them to compare my answer with the googled on you got.
I would like people to post serious questions here, test my knowledge with serious question, not because you want to try undermine me. Ask me your homework questions, things you have always wondered about the universe, etc etc.
Ask me real questions, don't toy with me.
Ahh, anything you say on the subject of the Universe is purely heresay, no matter how good your acadamia is. I have no doubt you are a very smart person, but seeing as the Scientific community can still not define the universe as finite or infinite, any "facts" on the Universe is surely, opinion?
AR-Elite Hall of Famer
^^^^ right.....
I wasn't trying to undermine him..... I thought I was helping by testing his knowledge to help him prepare.....
~Haz~
'everything louder than everything else'
bingo!!! steven hawkings is full of pretentious shit imho
Anabolic Member
100% correct. And if you look over my previous posts, i always tell people it is only theory and not proven. By universe, i mean everything, it does not have to mean space. It can mean anything earthly as well.
I have stated in a previous post to keep theoretical physics out of this thread, but people just post without reading.
Oh well, I'll try my best to convey the scientific communities majority accepted view on the matter.
To all you other whores, i will answer your questions later, I am off to the gym. Christ, i havnent even looked at the questions, but there is 2 pages owrth, I will have some fun tonight.
Senior Member
Nevermind. It's the Quantum Theory of Non Locality, which essentially says that acting on a photon here effects a photon at another location.
The guy doing the experiment is basically reversing cause and effect with photons. Pretty cool stuff.
Senior Member
Sorry; I think this is where I took the idea that theoretical physics were back on the table, so to speak.Can you guys stop googling things and then posting them to compare my answer with the googled on you got.
I would like people to post serious questions here, test my knowledge with serious question, not because you want to try undermine me. Ask me your homework questions, things you have always wondered about the universe, etc etc.
Ask me real questions, don't toy with me.
Anyway, if you're bored, Dark matter is back up.
Member
what microorganisms do not contain DNA?
Anabolic Member
Off the top of my head i think prions are the only microorganisms without DNA, but they are only a protein molecule, so i don't know if you would include them.
~AR-Elite-Hall of Famer~
All living organisms contain DNA, viruses which are not considered living have a few that contain RNA as their nuclaic acid. Prions are not considered living as well. At current they are thought as a type of rogue protien that mimics that of a functional protien in amino acid sequence. What is different is the three dimensional configuration of the protien structure itself. Interestingly prion diseases and the agent or rogue protein that causes disease can actually take the normal protein it mimics and transform it into another rogue protein. Simply by coming into contact with it and too changing it's normal 3D structure. Isn't nature cool as hell!
“If you can't explain it to a second grader, you probably don't understand it yourself.” Albert Einstein
"Juice slow, train smart, it's a long journey."
BG
"In a world full of pussies, being a redneck is not a bad thing."
OB
Body building is a way of life..........but can not get in the way of your life.
BG
No Source Check Please, I don't know of any.
Depressed? Healthy Way Out!
Tips For Young Lifters
MuscleScience Training Log
Anabolic Member
LGM, i will answer your question. I stated in a post a few posts back that i want to do BJJ's first before i did the other guys!Sorry; I think this is where I took the idea that theoretical physics were back on the table, so to speak.
Anyway, if you're bored, Dark matter is back up.
Sorry, but it looks like you answered yours already,
Ill do the dark matter one and all the other ones too i missed, i want to play with BJJ's though, plus i have to take care of a few things tonight, e.g i just got home from a missus's place, im getting ready fr bed now.
Sapiens Fingit Fortunam Sibi
Well I had no idea I had a friend on this forum...Good-morrow Gentlemen and Ladies...
Many of you might know me as AR's resident nerd (amongst other things). I am currently undertaking a double bachelors, honors degree in Engineering: Aerospace Mechatronic Engineering, and Science: Bio-molecular Genetic Engineering. Being half way through my course i would love to have a stick poked at me and to revise anything i have forgot and to have a go at anything you guys throw at me.
So boys and girls if you have Questions you want to throw my way in regards to physics, chemistry, biology (general, I'm not that good with the human body... yet), maths, engineering (electrical, mechanical, civil, hell any! ) then do it!
Please don't ask me questions about your car, even though as with my degree I am doing mechanical engineering, that entail detailed machines, not your car! I am not a Mechanic.
This thread was inspired by Igifuno's failed attempt to outsmart me in the field of cell division,
So time for round two!
So try keep this serious. For more complex maths questions, give me a day or two, so i can write it out, scan it and upload it.
Have fun!
What do you think about my calculations in regard of 9/11 in marcus's thread?
Productive Member
What keeps the uvula from being ripped out of the back of a mans throat, when he performs oral copulation on an another exceptionaly well endowed man? I would ask DSM, but I'm giving him a much needed break. Aslo, after looking at my uvula in the mirror, it seems to be flattened out. Should I be worried?
Last edited by Shol'va; 06-27-2010 at 01:26 PM.
AR-Elite Hall of Famer
Why would it be ripped out? It's attached...... I don't see how it could be ripped out unless said "well endowed" man had a piercing.....
~Haz~
Anabolic Member
Provide a link please BJJ and i would be more than happy too.
What have you been schooled in?
Sapiens Fingit Fortunam Sibi
I copied and pasted (http://forums.steroid.com/showthread...#post4998515):
Provide a link please BJJ and i would be more than happy too.
What have you been schooled in?
by the way, I have a degree in mathematics (astronomical orientation) and a degree in theology.
I do not believe in BS either, that is why I use my brain to develop thoughts!
Once marcus asked me in my interview:
marcus300: If there is one thing in the world you could change, what would it be?
BJJ: Ignorance. (Those who rule us can keep doing that because ignorance is well spread-out).
You are the perfect example of those who I was referring to (no offence).
I am going to explain you now, why those sckyscrapers could not be molten in that way, apologizing for my English but I am not a native speaker:
The problem in itself is of a simplicity even disarming, especially for those who have an understanding of physics, enough a little. We just need to shape the free fall of a material body subject, in addition to the gravity, even to the resistance on the part of the material that surrounds the subject in question, so the air.
1&2 The material body p is dropped from a height L compared to the ground (equation of motion).
Where d = 9.8 m/s*s (the well-known acceleration of gravity) and k is a parameter called aerodynamic drag. In the case is k = 0 the solution is universally known.
3&4 A little less known is the solution to the [1] in the case in which the strength of the material (which may be a gas, a liquid or even a material in powder) is not negligible. To tackle the equation (which is of the second order and especially not linear due to the presence of the squared period) agrees reducing it to a system of two equations of the first order. The equation in unknown v is resolved in a classic way by separating the variables.
5 By integrating the [5] with the condition y(0)=L is finally obtained the solution.
6 At this point we need to specify something relatively to the constant k, which dimensionally is expressed in units 1/m. In any aerodynamic treaty you can find the formula that provides the aerodynamic drag (kg) of an object that moves in the air with speed v.
In which:
r, is the aerodynamic drag expressed in kg
ro=.125, is the density of air to share 0
sr, is the reference area in square metres
cd, is the coefficient of aerodynamic drag (typical value .2-.5]
7 From the time that in fall to constant speed the aerodynamic drag equals the weight of subject, with appropriate replacement in [6] it comes to the following value of k.
8 Since p the weight of subject in kg, assuming for simplicity sr = 1 square metre and cd = .5 (the subject is not efficient) for k it can be expected the result.
This means that for a subject with section equivalent of a square metre and heavy 30 kg is k = .01, while for a subject with the same section equivalent heavy instead 60 kg is k = .005.
Now, if we could go back in time and place ourselves on the last floor of one of the two towers [110 plans, 415 metres of height] and drop from there above three objects, the first very heavy, with very section aerodynamics, the second with one square meter section of 60 kg heavy, the third, with the same section and heavy 30 Kg; using the formulae found previously we obtain that:
the first object arrives to ground zero in 9.15 sec.
the second object arrives at ground zero in 12.75 sec.
the third subject arrives to ground zero in 15.55 sec.
- Let's see see now the movie of the collapse of the South tower. From the first moment of the collapse the last floor of the South tower has arrived to the ground in about 11 seconds. In other words just one or two seconds more than if he had been in conditions of free fall in a vacuum.
- Now the North tower. From the first moment of the collapse the last floor of the North tower has arrived at ground zero in about 15 seconds. The time of falling in this case was superior, but still comparable with the time of fall of an object in free fall hindered by the mere resistance of the air.
The official hypothesis (fall for domino effect or if you prefer effect pancake) has no meaning.
In this case, the time of fall of the towers had to be in the order of 98 seconds, not 11 or 15, but 98. The difference is certainly not negligible.
Let's see now in practical terms that things to me personally, I would like to know by supporters of the truth Journal. All the calculation now displayed served to prove without a doubt a given incontrovertible: the upper floors of the towers are precipitated experiencing the resistance of the only air. What I want to know is simple: as may have the core of steel of the towers volatilized instantly leaving the upper floors literally suspended in the air? That happens only and exclusively in controlled demolitions, when the explosives, detonating, destroy all the structures of support of the planes at the same time. In a spontaneous collapse, instead, of course they yield before the most damaged, and only after they yield also the other support facilities, which are found to have to bear excessive weight and ultimately collapse. This would have happened in particular in the case of the collapse of the South tower, which had been affected on the side, and not in the center, and it was therefore found itself with the support structures damaged in one hand and intact in the other, and is instead collapsed in perfect vertical way and in the space of just 11 seconds or so.
Fall time so short and collapse so accurate and are therefore vertical explained only admitting that there has been use of explosives in the collapse.
Hope I was clear but mostly UNDERSTOOD.
AR-Elite Hall of Famer
Is the information content of the universe finite? Classical mechanics has an infinite amount of information in the location of a single particle and quantum mechanics has an infinite amount of information in the wave function of a particle, so the answer seems to be 'no', but this is by no means a proof.
~Haz~
Anabolic Member
There is no proof haz. You have to learn to both love and hate theoretical physicists. All they do is propose theory. Those of you with a maths background know that in any given point, aka a single particle, there is infinite amount of information. The content of the universe, mathematically has an infinite amount of information, because one can never reach a single point, this point can go on for infinity, aka divided into infinity. The universe itself may be finite, but then… what is on the other side? Nothing? Nothing is still something, it is space… so its not nothing? Then it is infinite… but its not. Having fun?
AR-Elite Hall of Famer
Here's the question of the century...... or should I say..... the question since the beginning of time.....
What is time?
~Haz~
'everything louder than everything else'
the space between dusk and dawn?
Productive Member
Time is something we never have enough of when theres too much sh*t to do.
Anabolic Member
Time is a human, mathematical y designed measuring system to measure changes in events over a period. Time does not physically exist, it is our creation. However, the change in events over a period of ‘time’ cannot be ignored. Time is nothing, and time is everything. Time is endless, and time has n beginning. There is no meaning to time, but what we place on it.
AR-Elite Hall of Famer
Whats really cool is how we can travel into the future...... but not into the past. We've already traveled into the future..... that russian astronaut who circled the earth for 800+ days at 13,000mph had effectively traveled 1/48th of a second into the future.
~Haz~
Productive Member
I don't know about traveling into the future, but taveling to the past would probably bring into effect the grandfather paradox. It states that if a man were to travel back in time and kill his biological grandfather before the grandfather met the grandmother, and as a result one of the mans parents and the man himself would have never been conceived. This would imply that he could not travel back in time after all. which means the grandfather would still be alive, and the man still would have been conceived allowing him to travel back in time to kill his grandfather. Each possibility seems to imply its own negation, a type of logical paradox.
AR-Elite Hall of Famer
Right..... the current belief is that we can't travel back in time. However.... those that think we can..... also believe in multiple universes. They believe that if you went back and killed your grandfather..... your timeline would split and there would be a universe where you would exist and one where you wouldn't.
Also..... theres the belief that if a time machine is ever invented..... one could only go back to the point where the time machine was invented but not before it..... almost like a loop on a roller coaster. The start of the loop is where the time machine is invented......
~Haz~
Productive Member
Way to go Haz, Both smart and tasteful. You are one of the areas in which DSM and I differ. I like a man with good taste, he likes his men to taste good.
AR-Elite Hall of Famer
LMAO..... I think I blushed.....
~Haz~
Dulce bellum inexpertis
How is information organized and transmitted through a radio wave?
Anabolic Member
Simply, you can edit a radio wave through its frequency or through its amplitude. When you modify the amplitude, the radio signal is called AM (amplitude modulation), hence frequency modulation is called FM radio. What happens is information is sent through analog codes (electrical pulses) to a either a crystal oscillator or a voltage controlled oscillator, which edit very high frequency waves generated with a transformer. These values are not discrete, aka they are not digital, or 1 and 0’s. They vary between a set voltage, and everyone is different, everyone is infinite, this is why you get static and such with analog signals. The maths behind these modulations are extremely complex, and I can go through them with you, but without a high knowledge in calculus you wont understand it. So let me know if you would like. Think of it as morse code, different beeps mean different things. So different amplitudes, or different frequency’s mean different codes. These codes are then translated by the receiver and sent through speakers. I hope that was helpful, it is the best I can do in layman’s terms without getting technical.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
