Ask Mr.Rose any Science/Maths/Engineering/Chemistry/Physics Question.

[Mr.Rose]

Hm, took a dip in the pool after a long day today and thought:

If you stayed in a pool (with chlorine) for excess amounts of time - for our sake let's say one day vs. one week - would there be any very negative effects? I notice the pruning after a few hours or so - so if a full day is spent a pool - what would happen?

Also, difference in regular pure H20?

^Hm, I'd like to hear about dark matter - natgeo & science channel are the SH!T when they talk about the universe.

The chlorine has no effect on the pruning of your skin. This is due to a phenomenon known as osmosis. Osmosis is described as the movement of water molecules through a semi-permeable membrane (aka your skin, cells etc) from a high concentration to an region of lower concentration until a state of equilibrium is reached. So basically, if you have a membrane (skin) and you have a cup of water with salt, and a cup of pure water, and separate them between the membrane, the water will move without inputted energy, to the side with salt as it wants to make both sides have an equal amount of salt, and hence achieve ionic/solute equilibrium. So basically, in your hands, feet, epidermis, you have water in your cells, 70% + of your body is water. In your cells, the movement of water in and out of cells (aka into the blood, into the lymphatic fluid, into cells, etc) is controlled through osmosis. It is non preferential and will move anywhere to achieve an equilibrium. So when you get into the pool, your epidermis extracellular fluid has a lower concentration of salt and minerals then the water in the pool around you. So naturally with osmosis, the water begins to exit your skin and move to the pool. This causes your epidermis to dehydrate, as it is losing water and prune up. This is why your skin gets wrinkled. Osmosis is slow, and takes a while; this is why it happens over a few hours. Now this is the reason then insist you put pool salt into your pool, to top this from happening. Remember dehydration can be fatal, so pelase drink plenty of water while swimming.

Dark matter
No one knows. Well everyone knows what matter is, its everything we can see, touch, feel. Well believe it or not, there is 5x more mass in the universe that is invisible and cannot be touched or seen. This matter is called dark matter, as in unseen matter. It is still tangible matter though. The simplest explanation I can give you, is that dark matter is pure energy, energy that is at such a high plain of excitement, that it has yet to slow down and start to form quarks, protons, neutrons, and hence atoms, and hence the matter we know. IT is the building block for sub atomic particles, and hence atoms. You see we can see things at a certain energy level, with is our matter we can see and touch, but when you go beyond this energy level, we cannot comprehend its existence. However we know it is there because it interacts with our electromagnetic spectrum. Simple enough?

[Mr.Rose]

Question:
From a science understanding is there any proof there is a spirit world, is there a different world beyond our senses?

Problem is, our senses are limited. We can only have things 5 tangible senses, touch, sound, taste, vision, smell. One example is many different species of fish native to coral reefs. When we look at the reef at night, we see darkness, but when some species of fish do, they see an amazing array of fluorescent lighting emitted from the coral. We lack this extra sense to see ulta violet light. Another example is sharks, they can sense electrical signals, and then bats who can sense high frequency waves. We can only understand what is tangible to us. So you can see that there may be a world beyond our senses, however science has yet to prove it. For example, my explanation of dark matter above, you see dark matter exists but it is at such a high energy level that we cannot see it. This may hold for spirits too. So I’m sorry big man, there is no real science to prove spiritual existence. I say real because real science provides experimental results, that when repeated provide the exact same evidence over and over again. This has yet to happen.

[Mr.Rose]

Do you think we will ever be able to time travel?

Do you think we (humans) will ever be able to travel at the speed of light?

How did the London terrorists make bombs with hydrogen peroxide?

How did the planned terrorists in the UK make bomb's using fertiliser? Obviously not every detail for the last two! But you can PM me if need be.

How do you work out the percentage change in 2 given values? For example, testosterone rose from 345 to 789. How would one calculate the % change (increase/decrease)?

How much (miles/radius) would a nuclear bomb detroy if set off in a city? Various sizes.

Do we know use hydrogen bombs or nuclear bombs?

No I do not, there is no proof that the universe ‘records’ information and plays them in an infinite loop. Time is a human convention, not universal. If we could time travel, then the universe would be one big loop that never had an end, and always came back to the start, like a tape recorder on replay.
No I do not think we can travel at that speed. Out atomic make up does not allow it. Only pure energy can travel at the speed of light, the atoms in our body would fall apart back into pure energy. The human body is such a frail object, that now jet fighters are unmanned and drones are taking over, because humans cannot travel over a certain mach speed, or we will die, which I think is mach 4, but it could be higher.
Hydrogen peroxide can be used as cheap explosive ingredient, however it is not what combusts, all the hydrogen peroxide does is provide oxygen to fuel the chemical reaction. The peroxide part of the chemical provides a highly volatile oxygen free radical that loves to steal electrons. A mixture of hydrogen peroxide, hexamethylenetetramine, citric acid and a detonating cap can make for a decent explosive. This explosive is HIGHLY dangerous and can explode even from the tiniest amount of friction! This will not work without a base charge. Commonly a explosive nitroamine is used, with cyclonite, hexogen being a common one. This bomb has known to kill more people attempting to make it then those it was intended to harm. Now we can also make a dry explosive, using fertilizer. It isn’t as intense but still works great. Potassium nitrate is a great fuel, but ammonium nitrate is much much better. Ammonium nitrate is not that volatile, and needs to be ignited, a lot of people use nitroglycerine, which itself is a very very very very very!!!! Dangerous explosive! I had to place emphasis on that. In industry, common diesel is used to ignite it. Now if you attempt to mix fuel and ammonium nitrate together and light it… it will be as much fun as lighting oil soaked dirt. It wont do anything. The exact science is dangerous, it involves secondary explosives, boosters, high pressure, and explosive caps.
Easy. Do this:
1) Original value = 345 , new value = 789
2) Now, % increase = New value – old value
= 789-345
=444
Thus % increase = (increase/original value)x100%
= (444/345)x100%
=128.7%
There is no way to know exactly, it depends on a large amount of variables and factors. There is also no way to know how strong the actual bomb is as these facts are kept secret. For example a nuclear bomb the size equivalent of 12.5 kilotons of TNT would produce explosive damage from the hypercenter to the edge of the blast of around 6km or 3.5 miles. Now then include the radius of radioactive damage, carried by water, rain, wind, etc. Add another 50km to that radius. Basically, the blast damage is proportional to its TNT equivalent, so 25 kiloton bomb would damage 7 miles or 12 km. But the design of the bomb, changes everything. Modern bombs, such as hydrogen bombs and such produce radius damages of 10-20x those values.
Pure fission bombs are the only ones that have every been used in war. Then we had fusion bombs, thermonuclear , neutron bombs and hydrogen bombs. They are all nuclear bombs. The USA has all in stock and ready to use depending on their needs. Now we use all bombs, but hydrogen bombs would produce the most damage.

[MaNiCC]

....pm

[Mr.Rose]

Thats me done for the day. Ill finish off the rest of the questions tomorrow. Its almost midnight where i am.

Checking it now my man.

[Mr.Rose]

Is it possible for me to have sex with an atom ?

A normal man, no. You... Yes, and with such intensity that you will start a chain reaction turning all atoms gay, pink and proud!

[marcus300]

Problem is, our senses are limited. We can only have things 5 tangible senses, touch, sound, taste, vision, smell. One example is many different species of fish native to coral reefs. When we look at the reef at night, we see darkness, but when some species of fish do, they see an amazing array of fluorescent lighting emitted from the coral. We lack this extra sense to see ulta violet light. Another example is sharks, they can sense electrical signals, and then bats who can sense high frequency waves. We can only understand what is tangible to us. So you can see that there may be a world beyond our senses, however science has yet to prove it. For example, my explanation of dark matter above, you see dark matter exists but it is at such a high energy level that we cannot see it. This may hold for spirits too. So I’m sorry big man, there is no real science to prove spiritual existence. I say real because real science provides experimental results, that when repeated provide the exact same evidence over and over again. This has yet to happen.

Thanks, very interesting.

[Mr.Rose]

Thanks, very interesting.

If you like Marcus, i can provide you with links to scientists that have attempted experiments on this subject? It's better to get views from any different people when it comes to a subject like spirituality.

[marcus300]

If you like Marcus, i can provide you with links to scientists that have attempted experiments on this subject? It's better to get views from any different people when it comes to a subject like spirituality.

Sure would be great to read,

[TheCamel]

Thanks, very interesting.

x2

Unfortunately Mr. Rose is correct.

[Swifto]

When we die, does our brain release DMT (The Spirit Molecule)? So in theory, death could be one large dream with no concept of time?

bump

[dec11]

Question:
From a science understanding is there any proof there is a spirit world, is there a different world beyond our senses?

there certainly is, do you not remember Rentaghost Marcus?

["Maximus"]

Nice thread Mr. Rose!

Elementary particle question for you...

Protons are injected into the 1.0-km-radius Fermilab Tevatron with an energy of 150GeV. If they are acceleraed by 2.5 MV each revolution, how far do they travel and approximately how long does it take for them to reach 1.0 TeV?

Not a hard problem to solve if you know your particle interaction/exchange very well!

[Mr.Rose]

bump

I never forgot about you swifto, . Just been busy. Now lets see.

This is an interesting concept Swifto, however, even though the body does produce endogenous DMT, when a person passes, the brain ceases to produce bio-electricity and hence has no way to communicate with itself and the rest of the body. DMT is produced in a variety of locations withing the body, some speculate mostly in the pituitary gland. How would the body continue to produce this chemical if it can no longer communicate? I've read about DMT numerous times as i am fascinated with the loss of reality to an individual, and i am amazed by its ability to distort ones reality so much that they cannot perceive what is real or not. We all know (Well i hope) the role DMT possess in our dreams, especially lucid dreams, so many people may believe that the lucid dream you may have before you die lasts forever, but it may only be short lived. The main thing to remember is, that once neurons cease to communicate, then a person is considered brain dead, and once the body ceases to function, then he is considered dead. Even though there is a large amount of DMT, serotonin, endorphins and adrenaline released prior to most deaths, they are short lived, and a person would only be able to 'enjoy' their effects whilst there brain can still process information. When a person is dead, they can no longer sustain the release of these chemicals and they will begin to break down. Now one can believe that this sudden release of these chemicals is to help project ones conscious to the next realm, be it what ever religion they believe in; so yes in theory death could be one large dream. But until one dead person, can communicate with us and be recorded, we will never know. My personal opinion, is that the release of these drugs is to ease the pain of death on an individual, as i do not believe in an afterlife of any kind.

[Mr.Rose]

Nice thread Mr. Rose!

Elementary particle question for you...

Protons are injected into the 1.0-km-radius Fermilab Tevatron with an energy of 150GeV. If they are acceleraed by 2.5 MV each revolution, how far do they travel and approximately how long does it take for them to reach 1.0 TeV?

Not a hard problem to solve if you know your particle interaction/exchange very well!

Thank you. Haha, i had to flick through my textbooks to find this! But it has been done.

R= 1.0x10^3
Initial E = 150 GeV
acceleration/rev = 2.5 MV
final E = 1.0 TeV

So:

Number of revolutions,
N = (Delta E)/(Delta E/rev)
N = [(1.0x10^12)-(150x10^9)](2.5x10^6)/rev
N = 60,000 revolutions

Distance traveled:

d = N(2pieR)
d = 60,000[2pie(1.0x10^3)]
d = 376991118.4 m
d = 376,991.12 km

time:

t = d/c
t = 376991118.4/(3x10^8)
t = 1.25663... seconds

Correct?

[Mr.Rose]

Marcus, I'll get back to you on those links, it's hard to find good, respectable scientists on the subject.

[Mr.Rose]

For Stevey:

[stevey_6t9]

very close, you got all the working right but you blew the last calculation where you got 1.11?? maybe calculator error, retype it in.

but the answer is 1.073 which you would have got.

but for your effort on answering my question i award you full points!

[Mr.Rose]

Haha, yup, answer is 1.072544082.

My calc is low on batteries and is pissing me off.

Stupid stupid calc.

This ****ed me up in my last exams too, grrr, better get a new calc before next sem.

[stevey_6t9]

Haha, yup, answer is 1.072544082.

My calc is low on batteries and is pissing me off.

Stupid stupid calc.

This ****ed me up in my last exams too, grrr, better get a new calc before next sem.

not good enough rosie, and i also said 4 sig figures not decimal places

lol kidding

[YoungGunsNY]

The chlorine has no effect on the pruning of your skin. This is due to a phenomenon known as osmosis. Osmosis is described as the movement of water molecules through a semi-permeable membrane (aka your skin, cells etc) from a high concentration to an region of lower concentration until a state of equilibrium is reached. So basically, if you have a membrane (skin) and you have a cup of water with salt, and a cup of pure water, and separate them between the membrane, the water will move without inputted energy, to the side with salt as it wants to make both sides have an equal amount of salt, and hence achieve ionic/solute equilibrium. So basically, in your hands, feet, epidermis, you have water in your cells, 70% + of your body is water. In your cells, the movement of water in and out of cells (aka into the blood, into the lymphatic fluid, into cells, etc) is controlled through osmosis. It is non preferential and will move anywhere to achieve an equilibrium. So when you get into the pool, your epidermis extracellular fluid has a lower concentration of salt and minerals then the water in the pool around you. So naturally with osmosis, the water begins to exit your skin and move to the pool. This causes your epidermis to dehydrate, as it is losing water and prune up. This is why your skin gets wrinkled. Osmosis is slow, and takes a while; this is why it happens over a few hours. Now this is the reason then insist you put pool salt into your pool, to top this from happening. Remember dehydration can be fatal, so pelase drink plenty of water while swimming.

Thanks for the detailed answer. I knew dehydration would be a factor - couldn't believe I forgot about the specifics of osmosis. Reading halfway in - I thought maybe if you're underwater for an extended amount of time - you would lose a lot of your ions to the point where it would be fatal. Now by extended time I meant days+. But you answered my question, thanks....

Keep the thread for my studies!!

[Phate]

How much tequila (40%) would a 200lbs person with 8%bf have to drink during ketosis measured at a voiding level of 15mg/dL of acetoacetic acid in order to overcome the body's natural carbonate ion buffer system and enter ketoacidosis?















jk bro, nice thread btw

[Mr.Rose]

How much tequila (40%) would a 200lbs person with 8%bf have to drink during ketosis measured at a voiding level of 15mg/dL of acetoacetic acid in order to overcome the body's natural carbonate ion buffer system and enter ketoacidosis?

jk bro, nice thread btw

Does said person have diabetes? Is said person in calorie restriction? Does the tequila have the worm in it? Im guessing we are analysing urine here, so how long as the urine been standing? as ketone bodies bread down fast by bacteria.



Lucky I'm an engineer ay? I'll leave this kind of work you phate.

Thanks, Waiting for more questions now, actually i have to double check i answered them all.

But if you may, explain this in regards to over coming body's natural carbonate ion buffer system?

[bjpennnn]

How much tequila (40%) would a 200lbs person with 8%bf have to drink during ketosis measured at a voiding level of 15mg/dL of acetoacetic acid in order to overcome the body's natural carbonate ion buffer system and enter ketoacidosis?





jk bro, nice thread btw

wow hahaha

[Igifuno]

Mr. Rose.

[DSM4Life]

what is 345.39458 + 3849583 - 93849 / 8376 * 38575930284 (874382)^2 ?

[Mr.Rose]

what is 345.39458 + 3849583 - 93849 / 8376 * 38575930284 (874382)^2 ?

DSM, very messy syntax

So

345.39458+3849583-(93849/8376)*38575930284*(874382)^2

= -3.31x10^23

And yes DSM i was actually that bored that i answered the question.

[Mr.Rose]

Mr. Rose.

bahahahahahahahaha,

Please tell me you drew that?

[Igifuno]

Haha.. no I just google Mr. Rose and that's what came up.. LOL..

Check your PM..

[Abominator]

What is the equation for converting horse power into rat power?

["Maximus"]

Thank you. Haha, i had to flick through my textbooks to find this! But it has been done.

R= 1.0x10^3
Initial E = 150 GeV
acceleration/rev = 2.5 MV
final E = 1.0 TeV

So:

Number of revolutions,
N = (Delta E)/(Delta E/rev)
N = [(1.0x10^12)-(150x10^9)](2.5x10^6)/rev
N = 60,000 revolutions

Distance traveled:

d = N(2pieR)
d = 60,000[2pie(1.0x10^3)]
d = 376991118.4 m
d = 376,991.12 km

time:

t = d/c
t = 376991118.4/(3x10^8)
t = 1.25663... seconds

Correct?

Mr. Rose,

You were so close, bud! I give you full credit, however, for working out the problem with such detail.. +5

The right answer is below, which I would say your answer was potentially off due to that darn calc batteries running low !

Best bro!
Max


N = (delta)E/[(delta)E/rev]

= 91.0 x 10^12 eV - 150 x 10^9 eV/[2.5 x 10^6 eV/rev] = 3.4 x 10^5 rev


Distance (d) = N(2pieR)

= (3.4 x 10^5)2pie(1.0 x 10^3 m) = 2.136 x 10^9 m ≈ 2.1 x 10^9 m



Therefore,


t = d/c

= (2.136 x 10^9 m)/(3.00 x 10^8 m/s) = 7.1s

[Mr.Rose]

Mr. Rose,

You were so close, bud! I give you full credit, however, for working out the problem with such detail.. +5

The right answer is below, which I would say your answer was potentially off due to that darn calc batteries running low !

Best bro!
Max


N = (delta)E/[(delta)E/rev]

= 91.0 x 10^12 eV - 150 x 10^9 eV/[2.5 x 10^6 eV/rev] = 3.4 x 10^5 rev


Distance (d) = N(2pieR)

= (3.4 x 10^5)2pie(1.0 x 10^3 m) = 2.136 x 10^9 m ≈ 2.1 x 10^9 m



Therefore,


t = d/c

= (2.136 x 10^9 m)/(3.00 x 10^8 m/s) = 7.1s

Dity son of a b1tch, i don't know if it was my stupidity or when i pressed the button on my calculator it didn't register, because when i was calculating revolutions, i didn't put it into a fraction, instead i multiplied it. So everything else is good but i fvcked that up. Stupid.

I'm writing it off as my stupidity not to double check my numbers, because as we all know, one number wrong will fvck everything else up.

Out of curiosity, what have you studied?

Keep the questions coming you whores.

[Mr.Rose]

What is the equation for converting horse power into rat power?

(12.452* No. of horses)^(no. of escorts in my apartment being filed)-(rats health status)*(rats age in seconds) - (the mney in my bank account)

I think that's right.

[Mr.Rose]

Haha.. no I just google Mr. Rose and that's what came up.. LOL..

Check your PM..

You dirty, dirty, dirty, filthy, yet sexy SOB..... PM returned.



More questions please... serious questions.



(ps, thanks for the tag IG, )

[DSM4Life]

Math question:

Cheater = 1
Not a cheater = 0

If I am with a she-male but in a relationship, the she would cancel out the male thus leaving me with a zero, correct ?

She cancel male = 0 = no cheater ?

[Mr.Rose]

Math question:

Cheater = 1
Not a cheater = 0

If I am with a she-male but in a relationship, the she would cancel out the male thus leaving me with a zero, correct ?

She cancel male = 0 = no cheater ?

Well if we work in identity matrices then we can do a bit of linear algebra here.

so we know that I(n) multiplied with itself will cancel itself out. Simple matrix algebra.

So lets say

He = A = 1
She = B = 1
Heshe = I
SheHe = I

So now Heshe*SheHe*You(he) = I*I*A = I^-1*1 = 0*1 = 0, therefor not a cheater.

[Xtralarg]

Can you recommend a lab that can test a vial recombinant human growth hormone?

[Mr.Rose]

Can you recommend a lab that can test a vial recombinant human growth hormone?

My lab can do that, if you care to send all your rhGH vials over. .

Depends where you are from, i know a place in Australia.

[Matt]

Stop fvcking around Mr Rose and get in this thread and sort it out...

http://forums.steroid.com/showthread...38#post5256238

[Mr.Rose]

Wow 4 pages worth matt, looks like i wont be sleeping tonight.