ever did sustonon and eq?

[S431M7]

Anyone here lately did stacked sustonon 250 and eq? If so how did u react to it, what was the side, how did u control it???

Thanks for info

[C_Bino]

Well many people have done test and EQ and since all test is the same, save the weight of esters I would say it doesnt matter if its sust or not.

I have run Prop and EQ and had good results but also you are not listing your dose per week or how long you plan to run it for so with the extremely vague and limited information you gave I doubt you are going to get many helpful responses.

[S431M7]

Thanks C-B. I'm doing test e and deca right now. I'm in my 2nd week. But the reason I brought this up is because I was reading the profile on sust 250 and eq, and according to what I read so far these two cmpds appears to be the most superior AAS than what I'm currently using because of its combo ingredient if u will per milligram. However it may seems the sides that comes with should be unimaginable.

[SNUKA]

they are if anything the most inferior steroids. eq is weak and sust is too many esters to keep levels stable there are so many arguements on sust. single esters are better

[lilripped]

I get no sides from this stack. I mean maybe a tiny bit of water retention but not much at all. If you are thinking about using sust, I would recommend going with omnadren as it is extremely close to being the same as sust but is a lot cheaper.

[kynetguy]

they are if anything the most inferior steroids.

that is a pretty much useless answer. EQ is weak compared to some others. But many people get great results from it.

sust is too many esters to keep levels stable there are so many arguements on sust. single esters are better

That too is blatently incorrect and subjective. Sust was formulated for test replacement therapy and to be used once a week or once every 2 weeks while maintaining a steady release. So steady blood levels is what it does best. (at least for weekly or every other week injections in the case of TRT.

However in the case a cycle and how we use it, more frequent injections are needed for the higher levels we are running. Sure, you could shoot one 500mg once a week inject and your levels would stay pretty level. (not as level as frequent injects mind you) The problem with sust is that with infrequent injects, your levels won't peak as high because of the shorter esters. Thus, you need to "refresh" with frequent injects to keep the short esters active.

I personally like Sust. Its not my favorite Test. But I get just as good of results from it as anything. Test is test. Stable blood levels is 100% ***endant on proper injection frequency. Sust is best shot EOD and no less frequently than every 3 days.

[operationgetbig]

I get no sides from this stack. I mean maybe a tiny bit of water retention but not much at all. If you are thinking about using sust, I would recommend going with omnadren as it is extremely close to being the same as sust but is a lot cheaper.

all the new batches of omna's are exactly the same as sust amps. Since the year 2000 it's been like that i think.

[lilripped]

all the new batches of omna's are exactly the same as sust amps. Since the year 2000 it's been like that i think.

Going according to Anthony Robert's profile.

Most commonly, people will correlate Omnadren 250 with its
cousin Sustanon 250, since they are both a blend of 4 test esters. The
only difference between the two lies in the last –and most concentrated-
ester. Whilst Omnadren contains the caproate ester, Sustanon contains the
decanoate ester in the same concentration. Really, except for price, there’s no difference…and price-wise, you’re going to be paying ½ as much for Omnadren as you would for Sustanon. This is a very nice price, and for that reason, I typically advise people to purchase Omnadren over Sustanon, if their source carries it.

[kynetguy]

Don't post pricing. Its against the forum rules. Please edit!

[lilripped]

Don't post pricing. Its against the forum rules. Please edit!

Just copied Anthony Roberts profile. Didn't even see the part about price. But thanks for lookin out.

[kynetguy]

Just copied Anthony Roberts profile. Didn't even see the part about price. But thanks for lookin out.

Yea you know, that almost every Anthony profile has pricing guidlines at the end. But they go nuts if we post something.

[taiboxa]

too many people think the ester really makes a flippin difference lol

[mkrulic]

that is a pretty much useless answer. EQ is weak compared to some others. But many people get great results from it.

wouldnt call it useless. If it steers you away from a compound that is as weak as eq then this statment has value. this guy is going by what he read in the profile which allways over hype eq. if you do a search on effectivness of eq you will find that the VAST majority of people on this board that have tried it find it over hyped. appetite and vascularity. appetite is no reason to take an aas and vascularity can be found w/ diet.

[kynetguy]

wouldnt call it useless. If it steers you away from a compound that is as weak as eq then this statment has value. this guy is going by what he read in the profile which allways over hype eq. if you do a search on effectivness of eq you will find that the VAST majority of people on this board that have tried it find it over hyped. appetite and vascularity. appetite is no reason to take an aas and vascularity can be found w/ diet.

I dont totally disagree.

I do think its a bit over-hyped. But I would not go as far as to say it is inferior and leave it at that. It definately has its place, but I wouldn't expect too much.

As for vascularity and EQ versus diet. . .I do not fully agree that diet will give you the vascularity effects of EQ. Diet certainly will allow you to decrease subcutaneous fat which will make existing vascularity more pronounced and supplements (there are so many) such as niacin will help with vasodialation to make your vessels dialate more. But this is still not the same as you would get with EQ

Another benefit of EQ is increased RBC. Though this can be a positive and a negative. Increased RBC is going to carry more oxygen and nutrients to your muscles. Thus your endurance does increase with the use of EQ which makes it popular with atheletes. But an RBC too high will increase fatigue. (donate blood mid-cycle. . .?)

The appetite increase with EQ really makes it an Oxymoronic suggestion for cutting, though that is what most people use it for. I personally would think its a much better fit in a builking cycle. Ever just get tire of eating 4-5000 cal a day? I get tired of looking at food. With EQ no fear, you are always hungry so eating becomes a neccesity rather than a chore you do because you have to eat to bulk.

We can agree to disagree. I always find EQ like the WInny vs Anavar debate. You never can get 100% agreement on it.

[SNUKA]

I was reading the profile on sust 250 and eq, and according to what I read so far these two cmpds appears to be the most superior AAS

i was commenting on how he thinks eq is the most superior out of all the steroids from what he has read in the profiles. the profiles are way over hyped like someone already mentioned. read other peoples logs. i ran it twice and at the time i thought it was worth it, but looking back on it now i can see why i wont use it in further cycles. like alraedy mentioned RBC count got too high to quick for me, appetite was a little too crazy and length it has to be run to see even minimal effects.try running it and see how it works for you. but as far as most superior not a chance.

[taiboxa]

Friends dont let Friends use EQ! its just WRONG!

[nathanst0]

Anyone here lately did stacked sustonon 250 and eq? If so how did u react to it, what was the side, how did u control it???

Thanks for info

I've ran this combo before. 500 Test/500 EQ every week for 10 weeks. I made nice gains and the sides (for me) weren't too bad. The main problem I had was water retention. At about the 5 week mark I had to start running A-dex and that pretty much took care of it.

[J*U*icEd]

ive used the brand name durateston and eq... i liked it and had good results wit it but i enjoyed and got better results from prop and something like NPP.... but the eq did get me incredibily ripped and vascular, and the increased hunger was a plus... but its up to the user

[gooer]

my appetite is significantly increased on sustanon alone if that's the main reason you are using EQ. worth noting, esp since buying enough EQ to get good results costs $$ when compared with other more effective compounds.

[buffgator]

I have run sust stacked with eq more than any other combo and I have really liked it.

[S431M7]

i was commenting on how he thinks eq is the most superior out of all the steroids from what he has read in the profiles. the profiles are way over hyped like someone already mentioned. read other peoples logs. i ran it twice and at the time i thought it was worth it, but looking back on it now i can see why i wont use it in further cycles. like alraedy mentioned RBC count got too high to quick for me, appetite was a little too crazy and length it has to be run to see even minimal effects.try running it and see how it works for you. but as far as most superior not a chance.

u need to reread what I wrote very careful. I was referring to sustanon being superior to others because of its combo ingriedients not the eq. You obviously don't have any knowledge on these cmpds if u think eq has a combo ingriedient of test. If u misunderstood my statement above it is no big deal. But if u were not, then your complement was meaningless as suggested above.

[Misery13]

i've ran EQ and SUSTANON I was a little bloated but I took creatine and that seemed to get rid of the bloating other than that no prominate sides other than increase sex drive.

[S431M7]

hey folks which combination did u had the best experience? Sust with eq or test-e with dbol?

[taiboxa]

hey folks which combination did u had the best experience? Sust with eq or test-e with dbol?

well since sust is test basically ur comparing EQ vs DBOL.. not really much of a comparison at ALL there

[S431M7]

well since sust is test basically ur comparing EQ vs DBOL.. not really much of a comparison at ALL there

FYI sust is a combo of testostrones

[FranKieC]

FYI sust is a combo of testostrones

I'm pretty sure he knows this lololol

[juiceinthehood]

I have done this stack in the past have had good results..
And personally really like Eq its quality muscle your building it makes you hungry yes, but you have to have disipline not to over eat...

[kynetguy]

I'm pretty sure he knows this lololol

LOL, my thoughts exactly.

[kynetguy]

FYI sust is a combo of testostrones

QUICK!! Without looking what 4 esters and how much of each make up Sustanon???????

EEEERRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR Times up!

I am sure Tai is glad you enlightened him.

[taiboxa]

FYI sust is a combo of testostrones

you are aware that the ester is irrelevant to WHAT the actual hormone is right? thus even if u have an 18 ester blend of test ITS STILL TEST just w/an ass load more fluctuations than a single ester administered properly.... right?

sust is no different that testE which is no different than test prop which is no different that test isocaproate.. all that is different is the ACTIVE LIFE.. it is still TEST

[kynetguy]

sust is no different that testE which is no different than test prop which is no different that test isocaproate.. all that is different is the ACTIVE LIFE.. it is still TEST

Prop is still better.

LOL

[S431M7]

Prop is still better.

LOL

I agree

LOL

[kynetguy]

you are aware that the ester is irrelevant to WHAT the actual hormone is right? thus even if u have an 18 ester blend of test ITS STILL TEST just w/an ass load more fluctuations than a single ester administered properly.... right?

sust is no different that testE which is no different than test prop which is no different that test isocaproate.. all that is different is the ACTIVE LIFE.. it is still TEST

You know, I was going to withhold saying this because this is going to confuse most people, but you will understand.

mg for mg shorter esters give you more test than long esters. Granted, the difference is not worth considering, but it is true none the less.

[taiboxa]

You know, I was going to withhold saying this because this is going to confuse most people, but you will understand.

mg for mg shorter esters give you more test than long esters. Granted, the difference is not worth considering, but it is true none the less.

yeah but i kan cram more long ester in a mg than short ester
so a full syringe of trenE> full syringe of trenA

[kynetguy]

yeah but i kan cram more long ester in a mg than short ester
so a full syringe of trenE> full syringe of trenA

Touche!