Results 1 to 22 of 22
-
07-13-2004, 03:00 PM #1Associate Member
- Join Date
- May 2004
- Location
- Puerto Rico
- Posts
- 167
Deca or Equipoise? Which one , why?
I'm am in the time of deciding which of those two babies I use for another mass blast! I know Deca heals your joints, but as I re-search the two of them are much alike.
Deca is an old timer and EQ is more recent. Kind of difficult when you have both to choose. I will combine it with Cypionate at 400mg both.
By the way my stats:
22 years old
215lbs
15.9 BF
166.46 Lean Mass
Endomorph
Let me know your opinion.
-
07-13-2004, 03:38 PM #2
I know this might not be much help but do a search. There has been MANY deca vs. EQ posts. It all comes down to what you want to accomplish.
-B
-
07-13-2004, 03:58 PM #3Originally Posted by twosocks40
-
07-13-2004, 03:59 PM #4
I think we have what we need. You are looking for mass. Deca is the one to go with hands down for straight up mass.
-
07-13-2004, 04:23 PM #5
deca for solid mass and EQ for lean quality mass. However deca has more sides and is harder for recovery
-
07-13-2004, 07:18 PM #6Associate Member
- Join Date
- May 2004
- Location
- Puerto Rico
- Posts
- 167
Dennis James Physique Type will do it!
I'm looking to get more solid muscle. I whant to be big, big fan of Dennis James! Dennis James is kind of my type of dude that I will like to copy & paste his physique.
Dennis James Physique= My Goal
Now: 215 lbs
22 Years Old
5'11
15.9 bf
166.46 Lean Mass
Eating about 2,500-3,000 calories a day. Will start this cycle in about 1 month. Just need some good quality comments!
Appreciate all your help dudes!
MR. Juice
-
07-13-2004, 07:24 PM #7Member
- Join Date
- Oct 2002
- Posts
- 676
why are u trying to be some1 else? be your own person be bigger then whoever this dennis james guy is lol.
-
07-13-2004, 07:30 PM #8
I have done EQ but it was stacked with test prop and have never done deca . But for mass from what I understand deca will be better. You can also up your calories another 1000.
-
07-13-2004, 07:39 PM #9Associate Member
- Join Date
- May 2004
- Location
- Puerto Rico
- Posts
- 167
Joe capone and others...
Yes I am myself, in fact i love my body. But this is more like an obsession with the gym. I just threw a name so you guys can get the picture of the like!
I'm currently cutting. Seen lots of post, but deca side effects are very severe. Eq seems to do better for more hard vascularity and more lean mass.
Also with EQ i think I don't have to worry about gyno.
I think i'm going with EQ/Cypionate both at 400mg with Nolva at 20mg every day.
Now I need to know how to mix these damm HCG . Kind of confusing.
Mr. Juice
-
07-13-2004, 07:41 PM #10
I prefer eq over deca . I feel like i have kept more gains from eq than from deca, and my recovery was far easier.
-
07-13-2004, 08:16 PM #11Anabolic Member
- Join Date
- Jun 2004
- Location
- usa
- Posts
- 2,015
dont know Dennis James??? He's only one of the top 10 bodybuilders in the world...no big deal..
-
07-13-2004, 10:08 PM #12Associate Member
- Join Date
- Oct 2001
- Location
- in Denial
- Posts
- 483
I have had the same question before. I am not sure which route to go just yet either.
-
07-13-2004, 10:11 PM #13
not NEARLY enough calories for bulking for a guy your size.... try at least 4500 maybe 5000, try to make them clean though.
-
07-14-2004, 12:27 AM #14AnabolicAlien Guest
i disagree
i disagree with eq having more sides than deca . i've seen some horrible things happen to people taking eq (blood clots, pulmonary embolisms, etc.). eq was meant for animals. deca was meant for humans (mainly dialysis patients).
i also don't think it's harder to recover from deca. i think the recovery times are the same, HOWEVER since eq has a much longer half life it may appear as if the recovery time is shorter.
any other opinions? i'm thinking of trying deca my next cycle.
E.T.
-
07-14-2004, 12:29 AM #15Originally Posted by AnabolicAlien
-
07-14-2004, 02:47 AM #16
I had to make this decision for my current cycle, and I went with EQ just because I want to get veiny.
-
07-14-2004, 04:32 AM #17
-
07-14-2004, 04:44 AM #18AnabolicAlien Guest
fatmark
fatmark, you don't have to do them to be able to comment on the sides. i knew someone would say that. i've done tons of research on eq and deca , both online and with close friends who've done both. by the way, the number one thing i've heard from people is that deca-dick is total crap. i'm planning on using deca in my next cycle.
E.T.
-
07-14-2004, 08:07 AM #19
if youre going for mass why not just run both? i'm about to start running eq and deca with test. i've used each seperately a few times, but never the two together. from what i've heard the combination gives awesome results if youre looking to bulk.
-
07-14-2004, 10:09 AM #20Associate Member
- Join Date
- Oct 2001
- Location
- in Denial
- Posts
- 483
What are the respective half lifes of the two different substances....? I am looking at running a test and deca or eq cycle but will be finishing with a 3-4 week closer on prop so recover time should start 3 days after last prop shot.
-
07-14-2004, 11:10 AM #21Originally Posted by AnabolicAlien
Now back to the question. I've done a cycle with EQ, and I've done a cycle with Deca. I had much more quality gains with EQ with a lot less sides. But, like everyone has stated, It depends on what your goals are.
-
07-14-2004, 08:19 PM #22AnabolicAlien Guest
lol
your friends who did a deca only cycle are morons. what i'm saying is that deca-dick doesn't happen to people who use test with it.
you might want to read this thread: Stop bashing Deca! and telling newbies to use Test
... and how did you get the title "chemically superior"?
E.T.
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Dutasteride dosage while on and...
Today, 06:43 AM in ANABOLIC STEROIDS - QUESTIONS & ANSWERS