Anabolics
Search More Than 6,000,000 Posts
Results 1 to 13 of 13
  1. #1
    I-WISH-A-MF-WOULD is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    218

    Is Anabolic 2005 better than 2004?

    Got the 2004 version is 2005 a copy and paste or is it worth it?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Kentucky
    Posts
    1,856
    I'd say you will be fine with 2004. Nothing really big changed over the last year. Just a few new lab tests.

  3. #3
    Blown_SC is offline Retired Vet
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    6,917
    Not THAT significant, except for a few updates. There were a few errors is in though, which are currently being adjusted.

  4. #4
    CrispyHaole is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    426
    Depends what your looking for. For me it was a great improvement cause I still mess around with ph time to time and it's the 1st year to have any info on them. I'm also an avid user of dirty mex gear and the 2 new labs outta MX are listed along with legit/counterfiet pics. Other than those 2 main things, its the same as 2004.

  5. #5
    simster1 is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    NJ
    Posts
    262
    The 2005 also has a new page for holegrams .

  6. #6
    Tjelle's Avatar
    Tjelle is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Sandefjord
    Posts
    315
    anyone have anabolics 2005, orderd it at my local book stoor (kost me 120 dollars)
    is it worth it? and by theway i know i'vcould have bought(sp?) it way cheaper on theweb, but ididnt care... but is the book any good?

  7. #7
    don anabolico's Avatar
    don anabolico is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    248
    you got skrewed... you can get it online for 50

  8. #8
    oc pitbull is offline Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    665
    www.amazon***** cost me $50 bucks

  9. #9
    RoNNy THe BuLL's Avatar
    RoNNy THe BuLL is offline Anabolic Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    Toronto, Canada
    Posts
    2,968
    Both of them are a waste of money. You'll find more up-to-date info searching the net.

  10. #10
    don anabolico's Avatar
    don anabolico is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    248
    Quote Originally Posted by RoNNy THe BuLL
    Both of them are a waste of money. You'll find more up-to-date info searching the net.
    i think it looks cool on my book shelf.... great opener (chanllanging) when a girl comes across it "so whats all this about"

  11. #11
    RoNNy THe BuLL's Avatar
    RoNNy THe BuLL is offline Anabolic Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    Toronto, Canada
    Posts
    2,968
    Quote Originally Posted by don anabolico
    i think it looks cool on my book shelf.... great opener (chanllanging) when a girl comes across it "so whats all this about"
    Man, it ain't cool no' mo'. Women read into things too much nowadays and with all the anti-steroid talk over the news, it won't be an easy bang. It's better that she think you're natural, plus, nowadays who knows who's going to open their mouth and who tells what. All in all, it's better to keep things like this quiet.

  12. #12
    SplinterCell's Avatar
    SplinterCell is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    1,929
    Im sure its a great book but I wouldent risk having it on my shelf

  13. #13
    bigwill485 is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    126
    2005 is better only because the book cover is now a hard cover and it stronger. My 2002 and 2004 fell apart, so i would go with 2005

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •