View Poll Results: If Money Wasn't An Issue At All....
- Voters
- 13. You may not vote on this poll
-
HGH
7 53.85% -
AAS
6 46.15%
-
10-24-2005, 11:59 AM #1AR's Salad Tossing Connoisseur
- Join Date
- Apr 2005
- Posts
- 4,589
If Money Wasn't An Issue At All...
Would you run AAS or HGH?
Last edited by Dave321; 10-24-2005 at 12:03 PM.
-
10-24-2005, 12:01 PM #2
Both
-
10-24-2005, 12:02 PM #3AR's Salad Tossing Connoisseur
- Join Date
- Apr 2005
- Posts
- 4,589
I'm doin' my research right now on HGH and strongly considering running it for 6 months this year... just want to know what others think in comparison to AAS, and why.
-
10-24-2005, 12:02 PM #4AR's Salad Tossing Connoisseur
- Join Date
- Apr 2005
- Posts
- 4,589
Originally Posted by eGGz
-
10-24-2005, 12:06 PM #5Originally Posted by eGGz
-
10-24-2005, 12:14 PM #6AR's Midget Beater
- Join Date
- May 2005
- Location
- in your girls panties
- Posts
- 6,526
Hello Mr. Insane. I'd do both also. Why not go all out if money isn't an issue plus I from alot of threads i've read most of the people that run some type of roid, test with HGH get better results then HGH alone.
-
10-24-2005, 12:21 PM #7AR's Salad Tossing Connoisseur
- Join Date
- Apr 2005
- Posts
- 4,589
Originally Posted by Smak
-
10-24-2005, 12:24 PM #8
with hgh i'm just scared of the facial growth, organ growht, ect... i havn't done much research though. i choose aas as of now
-
10-24-2005, 12:26 PM #9AR's Salad Tossing Connoisseur
- Join Date
- Apr 2005
- Posts
- 4,589
Originally Posted by testosterona
-
10-24-2005, 01:01 PM #10
I asked someone about hgh and pct and they said there is no pct with hgh. If that is true I would go with hgh alone, seems like you wouldn't have to deal with all the side of aas.
-
10-24-2005, 01:06 PM #11AR's Salad Tossing Connoisseur
- Join Date
- Apr 2005
- Posts
- 4,589
Originally Posted by BuildaBeast
-
10-24-2005, 01:09 PM #12Anabolic Member
- Join Date
- Apr 2005
- Location
- somewhere
- Posts
- 2,738
AAS are more anabolic though. Not sure bout this so some1 correct me if Im wrong. I remember ppl saying that u cant even compare the gains on HGH alone to AAS alone.
-
10-24-2005, 01:10 PM #13AR's Salad Tossing Connoisseur
- Join Date
- Apr 2005
- Posts
- 4,589
Originally Posted by stupidhippo
-
10-24-2005, 01:11 PM #14Originally Posted by stupidhippo
HGH - hyperplasia
More permanent growth with hgh then there is with aas.
-
10-24-2005, 01:13 PM #15AR's Salad Tossing Connoisseur
- Join Date
- Apr 2005
- Posts
- 4,589
Originally Posted by Ejuicer
-
10-24-2005, 01:15 PM #16Originally Posted by eGGz
damnit you beat me lol
-
10-24-2005, 01:21 PM #17
Yo Justin man. You are moving on to GH, what a champ. I havent seen your ass in a long time. Super busy now that I have moved again and I'm in school. How u doin?
BTW I say go with the HGH, the gains are not going to fall off like they can with AS. Also the organ growth, bone growth in the face takes a long time and a lot of GH to do that. THe only down fall I have heard repeatedly about HGH is that you are sleepy all the time. Dont know how much truth there is to it or what not but that kinda sucks. As for bone/organ growth if you just run one cycle of it for six months you wouldnt notice any difference whatsoever. Let me know what you decide tho brotha.
-Bino
-
10-24-2005, 01:25 PM #18AR's Salad Tossing Connoisseur
- Join Date
- Apr 2005
- Posts
- 4,589
Originally Posted by C_Bino
-
10-24-2005, 01:31 PM #19Originally Posted by Justin Sane
But hey, the ends definitely justify the means in this case. Be sure to use a good inj site rotation.
M.
-
10-24-2005, 01:33 PM #20
At 24 you're not going to get as much out of it, as you'd like. HGH is more of an age depended drug, the older then better. The people I know that used it at your age used high doses to see the desired results.
I believe HGH is over played, if you want size slin will give way more size then HGH, but you need to know what you're doing. I used HGH, I have low HGH/IGF-1 and I was disappointed with HGH. I wouldn't but it again, unless I was paying a co-pay only. I got better results from LR3 and it cost a lot less.
As far as the facial growth goes, I just watched a program on the discovery channel, on the giant decease, some scary stuff, for young people and elevated HGH. There were 2 identical twins, one had a pituitary tumor that caused elevated HGH and they weren't identical anymore
JohnnyB
-
10-24-2005, 01:37 PM #21Member
- Join Date
- Jun 2005
- Location
- Boston
- Posts
- 928
johnny b i saw that show also..thats insane..i am deff intrested in HGH in the future what age is the right age to start to consider it?
-
10-24-2005, 01:38 PM #22Originally Posted by JohnnyB
Good point, what is your intended goal here Sane? From what I've read thus far (not much) you get some size, when used synergistically with T3, igf, etc., it serves even better as a shredding mechanism (Hooker).
What is your goal...weight/size incr., bf decr. etc.
M.Last edited by magic32; 10-24-2005 at 01:39 PM. Reason: forgot something
-
10-24-2005, 01:44 PM #23AR's Salad Tossing Connoisseur
- Join Date
- Apr 2005
- Posts
- 4,589
Originally Posted by JohnnyB
-
10-24-2005, 02:02 PM #24AR's Salad Tossing Connoisseur
- Join Date
- Apr 2005
- Posts
- 4,589
Originally Posted by magic32
I anticipate using it synergistically with T3, and potentially slin. Want to make some lean gains over an extended period of time, and keep bf% low. Quality gains are more important than fast ones for me at the moment.
-
10-24-2005, 02:23 PM #25
For anyone that has used HGH.....How well did it help you in burning off stubborn fat?
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Dutasteride dosage while on and...
Today, 06:43 AM in ANABOLIC STEROIDS - QUESTIONS & ANSWERS