Thread: Igf1-lr3 Vs. Tren Acetate
01-09-2006, 07:34 PM #1
Igf1-lr3 Vs. Tren Acetate
Hello fellas. Quick question - would you rather use IGF1-LR3 (25 days) or Tren Acetate (8 weeks) with a cycle of Test Prop? Which would produce more noticable gains?
01-09-2006, 07:37 PM #2
tren /prop will give you much more noticeable gains than IGF. IGF is pretty good, but you wont put on much muscle with it. Go to the IGF forum, theres a pretty good thread on what people think of IGF. Tren, on the other hand, is the bomb!
01-09-2006, 09:28 PM #3Originally Posted by longhorn814
Agreed, Tren and Test will produce some good gains. As Longhorn stated check out that GH forum, plenty of useful info to feel comforatable in your own conclusion on IGF. The good thing about the Tren/Prop combo is that you can combine it in one syringe and shoot it ED. Good solid, lean, keepable gains.................
01-09-2006, 10:12 PM #4
01-10-2006, 06:16 AM #5
hey jiggaman where is that post by pinnacle I wanna read it?
01-10-2006, 06:45 AM #6Banned
- Join Date
- Aug 2005
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)