Results 1 to 40 of 62
Thread: LR update
-
02-08-2004, 12:16 PM #1
LR update
As of right now most of us has only heard the medias slander regarding liquid research. I found this which expresses another side of the story. I am not taking anybodys side because I still dont know exaclty what happened.
Originally posted by bayoumike
I just think that everyone should be rested in knowing that the LR bust has nothing to do with ancillaries.....as a matter of fact the truth will be known shortly along with media rebutles. Some fat, jackass cops thought that they were going to be getting awards and pats on the back for this one and are desperately scrambling to cover-up their **** up. NO WAY IN HELL WAS LR MANUFACTURING GBL AND ESPECIALLY NOT SELLING IT. So far the contacts to LR customers have been more to inquire and make sure no GBL was purchased. They have found nothing, will find nothing and a serious lawsuit is in store. The new GABA products are amino acid deriviatives and actually got tested and cleared by customs long before the bust, completely 100% legal no loopholes needed. After the proof of the lack of GBL, the ancillaries and customers will not be an issue. The juice was a VERY small personal amount and the intent to distribute is always slapped down at first to beef up the charges. It is all lacking, a rumor must have passed due to the GABA which to the uneducated mass had somehow gotten confused with GBL.
-
02-08-2004, 12:30 PM #2
interesting.......does this mean LR might be back in buisness again
-
02-08-2004, 12:36 PM #3
wow thanks for the info bro!!
-
02-08-2004, 12:38 PM #4Originally Posted by nevaenuf
just wonder if it was really him,you never know what kind of s*** the cops try to pull........just a thought
-
02-08-2004, 12:38 PM #5Swellin Guest
I certainly Hope this is actually what happened. We must realize that the media is in the business of drawing a crowd...they don't even have to be right. Again, I hope it is something simple like this, and nothing like was previously mentioned.
-
02-08-2004, 12:41 PM #6
i hope it was just a misunderstanding...
-
02-08-2004, 01:37 PM #7
Keep us posted, as I am sure EVERYBODY wants to do what the hell really happened. Maybe they will be in business again, who knows.
-
02-08-2004, 04:06 PM #8
yea i definitly want to know what happend as i am exspecting $300 bucs worth of stuff...... it delayed my **** cycle! keep us posted everyone who gets info! thx
-
02-08-2004, 04:15 PM #9Originally Posted by Jackman
-
02-08-2004, 04:54 PM #10
In all fairness to LR if this is the same bust they tried to put on Animal it isn't going to stick.
-
02-08-2004, 04:57 PM #11
Thanks for posting this. Good to see all the info that is available on this.
-
02-08-2004, 05:50 PM #12Originally Posted by GetPumped
-
02-08-2004, 05:55 PM #13
Agreed, but the only thing that is fact is that they were running an illegal unlicensed lab in a residential neighborhood with a child in the house, so I'm sure there will still be some legal ramafications, but I hope they don't start making charges up just to cover their asses.
-
02-08-2004, 06:04 PM #14
Well, I live in the same town as LR...and know several cops that worked/are working on the case. As far as I am told, the cops were onto them selling GBL on the streets so to speak...they apparently have a CI that bought it from them. They found out about the site AFTER the bust.
D
We'll never really know until the end I guess....
-
02-08-2004, 06:21 PM #15Originally Posted by IGOTJUICE007
-
02-08-2004, 06:23 PM #16
hypothetcially if LR opens back up, you'd be a fool to order from them....MM
-
02-08-2004, 06:27 PM #17
why would you be a fool?
-
02-08-2004, 06:39 PM #18
Howdy,
Originally Posted by Jackman
Luckly Mexico is just a short trip down the road.
Stengun
-
02-08-2004, 06:51 PM #19
Bro the cops and the labs are two diferent things... i highly doubt that the lab is going to care much if the cops messed up as it is there job ..... as well as LR would have the right to get it tested by an independent lab.....
Originally Posted by stengun
-
02-08-2004, 06:55 PM #20
Hopefully they have a good lawyer, and the IRS is going to be a problem at some point im sure, im sure all of their money wasnt declared, regardless if the cops were wrong, they have a long road ahead of them.
-
02-08-2004, 07:02 PM #21
i know but if its a false arest i dont think they can be charged with anything else...... i may be wrong?
-
02-08-2004, 07:06 PM #22Originally Posted by Jackman
I believe it will be taken on a charge by charge basis, these guys prob had over 20 charges against them (they pull them out of their asses), so many of the charges may be dropped, but that doesnt exonerate them from every charge.
-
02-08-2004, 07:21 PM #23
Hehe but with the fines they might get from the tax evasion or jail time they will get back when they sue the **** out of the goverment....
-
02-08-2004, 07:30 PM #24
I dont know how long these guys have been in bussiness but unless is was before jan 2003, they wouldnt even be late on their taxes yet.
-
02-08-2004, 07:31 PM #25Originally Posted by IGOTJUICE007
-
02-08-2004, 07:33 PM #26Originally Posted by stengun
-
02-08-2004, 09:26 PM #27
Howdy Jackman,
Originally Posted by Jackman
The cops and the crime lab are the same people (remember civics class from the 9th grade?) and an outside lab will not hold up in court if it doesn't get the same results as the crime lab. You've been watching too much tv dude. oh, yea, there are fake drug laws on the book in every state (mandated by the fed.gov. in the drug control act of 1988) that states that if you pass anything off as an illegal drug, even if if is a common household item, like sweet-n-low, it is the same as it been the real drug. This was done partly due to all the designer drugs that where going around in the late '80's. Also makes it easier for the cops to steal the drugs and replace them with suger, silica or whatever. So, if the cops arrested them for selling GBL, and they have a CI that says the bought GBL from LR, it doesn't matter what it really is.
So, LR is still up **** Creek.
Stengun
-
02-08-2004, 09:29 PM #28
It does not matter what they arrested them for its if thats what they were telling people it was.... i know the law because a bro of mine got arrested for selling fake 80's....
-
02-08-2004, 09:29 PM #29
And like wally said the labs not going to cover for the cops so you need to stop watching to much T.V bro
-
02-08-2004, 10:23 PM #30
Howdy Jackman,
Originally Posted by Jackman
The DA isn't going to drop charges against them just because the drug doesn't test to be GBL because of the fake drug law that all states have.
My older brother is in jail right now on meth lab charges. A woman that we know got busted with a meth lab. The PA told her that they would give her a lesser sentence if she would testify against other people. She named several other people who she knew where on parole for drug charges, my brother being one of them. He is being held w/out bail because he is on parole. They offered him a 20 year plea, which he turned down. They told him the woman would testify that the lab was his and that they would give him 40 years and that he would have to do 28 years before he could get parole. Two of the other people have already taken a 20 year deal (will have to do 5 years). These are innocent people who took the deal because of how the system works. No proof or evidence, just a meth cooks word who was trying to get a shorter sentence.
No tv, just real life. This is something that Ideal with everyday. I'm trying to get a lawyer to sue the state on my brothers behalf for civil rights violation. No luck so far. My brother cannot prove he wasn't involved with the meth lab, how can you prove something like that anyway, so, w/ the woman's testimony, he's out-of-luck. He wasn't there at the time of the raid and they do not have any other evidence against him. The woman didn't have a car and has 2 small kids and I had loaned her an old car that I have. The car was there when they raided the lab, so, I'm lucky she didn't try to name me as well. I did get my car back from the police impound lot.
Stengun
-
02-08-2004, 10:42 PM #31
**** bro thats ****ty sorry to hear that
-
02-08-2004, 10:43 PM #32
isnt it inocent until proven guilty? thought he dont have to prove he wasnt part of it they have to prove he was
-
02-08-2004, 11:06 PM #33
Howdy Jackman,
Originally Posted by Jackman
Who do you think those little old gray haired women on the jury, who think that drugs are whats wrong with everything, going to beleive? My brother or the judge and PA they elected?
Welcome to the real world.
Stengun
-
02-09-2004, 01:47 PM #34Originally Posted by Jackman
-
02-09-2004, 01:51 PM #35
Any other info come out yet about the bust? (try to focus the thread a little)
-
02-09-2004, 02:14 PM #36Anabolic Member
- Join Date
- Sep 2003
- Location
- Florida
- Posts
- 2,886
Originally Posted by Jackman
Anyways false arrests happen all the time. Crack dealers selling fake crack also get arrested only to be charges dropped and released from jail as soon as the lab comes back with the fake crack as being not based on cocaine.
-
02-09-2004, 02:23 PM #37Anabolic Member
- Join Date
- Sep 2003
- Location
- Florida
- Posts
- 2,886
Originally Posted by Jackman
I dont think in this case fake GBL is the issue if it was identified as GABA... its not their fault if the cops misunderstood the difference between GABA and GBL.
-
02-09-2004, 02:43 PM #38
You need to be welcomed to the real world! A meth cooks testimony is not enough to convict. Even conspiracy which is the charge with the least evidence needed, you have to commit an overt act. Where is the overt act? Your brother being on parole is not an overt act. Where is this ladys credibility? She is a **** meth cook for crying out loud! I highly doubt the prosectution would take this case that is so weak. So are you telling me, that all they are going on is some tweakers testimony? Any decent defense lawyer(hell even a public defender) could bring up alot to fire back at this ladys shotty crediblity. And another thing no crime lab will lie, to protect the cops. That is the biggest crock of **** I heard today.
Originally Posted by stengun
-
02-09-2004, 02:58 PM #39
Doesn't matter. This is the way it works. If you have what you think is an illegal substance in your possession such as steroids . If you get arrested and charged for possession. Say it gets tested in a lab and guess what...your stash was fake steroids and sugar pills. You still get charged with possession of steroids. That's the way it works. Same thing goes for doing cocaine busts. ATF does a sting useing flower instead of cocaine. All the belief has to be is the product is cocaine and the charge will be as for cocaine. Supreme Court Ruling guys.
Originally Posted by stengun
-
02-09-2004, 03:02 PM #40
Well, I figured Bayoumike would be back around. From my experiences that bust wasn't really as bad as the media made it out to be. He is a good guy and after my dealing with bayoumike he gave me the impression he will take care of his custo's. As for building confidence back into his business after that. Well that's another issue. Someone up top hit it on the head. There is no telling what kind of monitoring LE is doing on his transactions now. As much as I study the law Im still not sure what legality his products have despite the claim of research purpose claim. We will see.
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Dutasteride dosage while on and...
Today, 06:43 AM in ANABOLIC STEROIDS - QUESTIONS & ANSWERS