Thread: 4-week cycles
03-15-2004, 12:59 PM #1
What do you guys think of this short cycles using short esters: like prop and dbol ? Do more frequent cycles at less sides. Anyone know Borrenson? That man recommended a maximum of 31 day cycle?
It interested me a lot. Waiting for your input. Peace.
03-15-2004, 01:02 PM #2
Short cycles like this will cause more sides because of the hormonal flux you will put your body through.
03-15-2004, 01:19 PM #3
Well, actually I know that's just "insanely stupid" to follow PB cycles like 20.000mg of roids at one time - but what I meant was the possible pros of something like this:
1-4 Dbol 30mg
1-4 Prop 100mg ED
It just would be cheaper for someone whose not reach enough, he he
In my opinion it is very interesting to take a closer look at this kind of crap, he he!
03-15-2004, 01:30 PM #4
There are none........ At 4 weeks your just starting to see gains....... Also, if you don't have the money to run the cycle right you should wait.
One more thing 1mg of L-dex is overkill
03-15-2004, 01:32 PM #5Senior Member
- Join Date
- Dec 2003
prop 100mg ed will be as expensive as test enth twice a week for 10 weeks?
and in a cycle like this:
1-10 test enth
youll need less than 1mg ldex ed --> .25mg will be eough, isnt it?
03-15-2004, 01:46 PM #6
"its not a poor man's game"...quote from another member, i cant take credit...
if your gonna do it, then why not do it right and run atleast 10 weeks?
03-15-2004, 01:50 PM #7
Yup, it will! Everyone likes 0.25mg. I messed it up. It should be 0.25mg - I was thinking of Paul Brennson recomending about 1mg or something due to water retention. My mistake, sorry.
Oh, one more ? - are you guys familiar with the russian test blend - Testenat 10% 20mg of prop and 80mg of enan of overall 100mg/ml?
03-15-2004, 02:30 PM #8
Well, your short-cycle idea would not work well with the test blend you listed. The test enan will only just be beginning to kick in when you are quitting your cycle. Better to run it with just test prop if you are going short term.
And Mud called it right. Your hormone levels will be like a yo-yo. Short would be more like 8 weeks. 12-16 weeks is the preferred short cycle timeframe.
03-15-2004, 03:09 PM #9Originally Posted by Tygh
03-15-2004, 03:30 PM #10
Longest for me was 36 weeks. I guess I should rephrase my response to read that 12-16 weeks is the "norm".
03-15-2004, 03:47 PM #11Senior Member
- Join Date
- Dec 2003
hope ure going to say at least 1 thing right before endin this thread...
dont take this wrong bro!
03-15-2004, 04:03 PM #12
Ok dude, I was just curious, he he
Thx to all!
03-15-2004, 04:17 PM #13Originally Posted by fabry
03-15-2004, 05:10 PM #14
no way will i ever run a cycle shorter then 12 weeks. M ylongest has been 10 and when I did that I found best gains were commming towards the end of the cycle. A tip for longer cycles woudl be add somethign extra at the end. I feel I go stale if i keep the doses the same towards the end aswell.
03-15-2004, 05:38 PM #15
Who was your statement directed at??
03-15-2004, 05:46 PM #16Registered User
Originally Posted by Mikey81
- Join Date
- Dec 2002
The food that your going to need to eat in order to get big is going to cost more than the juice, I go through about 50 eggs a week, good thing those are cheap though,
Milk-chesse-MEAT-bread-shakes-other supplements > cost of juice
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)