IGF1 compared to HGH

**Lbroker1** · 08-25-2006, 10:11 AM

I have never taken IGF1 LR3 and am considering a doing a 12 wk cycle along with the rest of my gear. I have done HGH in the past with great results. If one of the vets that has experience with both could put their opinion in it would be greatly appreciated. I was considering doing 50mcg a day of the IGF1. In the past with the HGH i would run 4-5 IUs a day. I am 6'5 weigh right at 245 and very lean.

**1buffsob** · 08-25-2006, 10:21 AM

IGF needs to be limited to about 5 weeks. No more. As for which one is better, that would depend on your goals. But most are going to tell you, unless you're cutting or in PCT, IGF isn't worth it. Save your money. I'd have to agree.

1buffsob

**Lbroker1** · 08-25-2006, 10:29 AM

Thanks for the input. I think I will stick with the HGH this time.

**graeme87** · 08-25-2006, 03:46 PM

Igf give much faster results where as HGH takes longer to kick, as already stated it depends on your goals. I have ran both (HGH up to 20iu ED can’t remember my exact IGF max dose). I like both compounds but I really depends on what your goals are.

***SPIKE*** · 08-27-2006, 11:03 AM

Originally Posted by graeme87

I have ran both (HGH up to 20iu ED

Dam dude 20iu ED?? How were the gains/sides to that?

Lbroker, I run LR3 in both cutters and bulkers it contributes in it's own way to each goal. I agree with Buff where it should be limited to 5 weeks tops, I prefer 4/4.

**almostgone** · 08-27-2006, 11:18 AM

Originally Posted by Jayhova

Dam dude 20iu ED?? How were the gains/sides to that?

Lbroker, I run LR3 in both cutters and bulkers it contributes in it's own way to each goal. I agree with Buff where it should be limited to 5 weeks tops, I prefer 4/4.

Same here.

AG