Summing up all of your posts, you are basically saying that you rely mostly on other's cycles because worked for the majority of the people in a way, so it should work also for you the same.
Your approach may fail since the fact that a cycle worked for 100 people in way, it does not mean it will for you the same.
Everyone's genetics is different so it differs the way our organism responds to the same drug, although we are all human beings.
My approach is instead individual systematic, taking into account my past medical records as well as the present ones plus a bunch of information related to the average of medical implications in using aas, referred by others.
I am constantly monitoring any changes and taking blood analyses every two weeks in order to lead the cycle in the proper direction by checking out the hormonal response I am receiving as the cycle goes forward.
Again, before saying my cycle is wrong, before saying my endo is not useful, before saying... all the rest, document yourself on the reasons why a person is acting in such a way, then you may express your ideas without being bad-mannered.
Regarding my endocrinologist, he is 57 years old and being a medical officer since he graduated. He also did two cycles in his life and working out since 25 years.
So, how comes your arrogance, rudeness, prosopopoeia, saying "he is not useful" or "***ck you endo".
What kind of person are you, what kind of people hang around here, since you are not the only one, unfortunately?
You lack respect toward a person who you do not know and surely know much more than you do regarding medicine.
Then, differently from you I do not need to "appear" who I am not and when writing or speaking I use my knowledge.
If not, I refer to the articles I took the information directly from.
Your explanation, totally unneeded to me, I already found it on this board:
http://forums.steroid.com/showthread.php?t=309685
The same article where you "copied & pasted".