How many of you used SARMs without PCT

**Steroidman99** · 12-06-2009, 07:49 PM

...and kept the gains?

It seems to be less suppressive than testosterone , but still, in doses higher than 30-40 mg/day in humans, the suppression of LH should be significant.

**rusty44** · 12-14-2009, 09:07 PM

What makes you say this?

**toothache** · 12-15-2009, 09:44 AM

Bass did 100mg ed and I believed he showed no difference in test levels.

**bass** · 12-15-2009, 11:10 AM

Originally Posted by toothache

Bass did 100mg ed and I believed he showed no difference in test levels.

i did light PCT, two weeks, Nolva 20mgs and Clomid 25mgs, then did nothing for a week, then the blood test, actually my total test went up a little...

**freakinhuge** · 12-16-2009, 12:46 AM

I think the pct is very dependent on how long you cycle this for and at what dose you use.

**chucklesmcgee** · 12-16-2009, 02:03 AM

Originally Posted by freakinhuge

I think the pct is very dependent on how long you cycle this for and at what dose you use.

I agree. If the dose is kept low enough that it's not suppressive, I don't see why PCT needs to be used. Actually, if it's not suppressive, I don't see why it really needs to even be cycled at all, though perhaps someone can enlighten me.