check this sh-t out. its hilarious
![]()
check this sh-t out. its hilarious
![]()
more propoganda!!! lol j/k I can't even read it!
nvrmind, I can see it nowOriginally Posted by aXe
![]()
looks about right
Nice pic you got there.![]()
lol, propaganda or not it's probably true.
awww you mad? just move if it bothers ya lol. and yes it is true, if you can read the bottom it says the sources.Originally Posted by D-END
Mississippi is 85. That's boarderline retarded.Originally Posted by jcstomper
![]()
i dont live there lol, i live in the mid atlantic, im in a kerry state lol hahahOriginally Posted by Peanut Butter
Its a hoax. Once again you have shown how "independent" you are.![]()
http://www.sq.4mg.com/IQstates.htm
Thank you Urban i was about to have to post the same/similar articalOriginally Posted by UrbanLegend
your kidding me right? maybe you should read the link lol. hahaahahahahaah i cant believe you posted that, here ill quote it for ya "Its ranking of states is partially accurate."Originally Posted by UrbanLegend
http://www.sq.4mg.com/IQ-States.htm
I think that this is the hoax, not the original post. Anyone can call something a hoax. If I make a website calling the need for oxygen to sustain life a hoax does that make it so? Some people believe everything they read and thats sad.Originally Posted by UrbanLegend
![]()
![]()
This quote is about the IQ's that your link says are more accurate. Does this not say that they're based of elementary school IQ tests? I would think high school tests would be more accurate. And is that second comment not the most racist thing you've heard in a while? Maybe not, but it is for me. Either way the "accurate" IQ's are not far off from the other chart. Just a few more red states higher up and a few blue ones lower down. You're still looking at a streak of red states on the bottom.These IQ's follow elementary school test results. The most likely reason for the lower IQ’s in southern states is the high proportion of Blacks in those states.
that's what I said it's probably true.Originally Posted by jcstomper
oh ok, sorry i mistook what you wrote then, my bad i apoligizeOriginally Posted by D-END
it's all good bro...kerry 2008 jkOriginally Posted by jcstomper
Propoganda = Info that does not go along with ones opinion. This of course being subjective to which point of view you have. One man's facts are another's propoganda, wether those facts are true or not.
LMFAO.. sorry, but that shyt is funny...![]()
Total Average of states voted for kerry = 98.89
bush = 96.27
so youre being misled. still you posted that doesnt show anything more then other then that you cant accept that he lost, and the fact that 70% of the people who voted for kerry only voted because they didnt like bush, not because they liked kerry.
im not pro kerry i dont care he lost, im actually happy, now when we get attacked again they can blame the real idiot. bushOriginally Posted by Psychotron
meh, as long as i dont get drafted.Originally Posted by jcstomper
haha yeah i hear ya on that one lol, ill peace out to canada if they start the draft lol. im not fighting for this idiot to avenge his daddy like a good ol boyOriginally Posted by Psychotron
well the reason i say that is because bush said there would be no draft, but kerry wanted to start one in 2005.Originally Posted by jcstomper
so what exactly would you have done? to stop terrorism?
true wisdom is to know that you yourself know nothing at all....
try posting in the right forum next time you knew this would not go over well.
i would have nuked the **** out of afganistan, not wait for ever to give the terrorists time to leave the country. i would have sent a message to the world that if you wanna try that sh-t with us you get nuked no question about it. have it over in a matter of minutes and let afganistan be a lesson to the world that we dont play around.Originally Posted by SickNasty
instead bush decides to wait a while then pussy foot about it cause he really wants to be in iraq for oil and hallaburton. our own government said there are no ties to alquada to saddam. they were actually a threat to saddams exsistance. know the facts before you try to spread your crap
Last edited by jcstomper; 11-14-2004 at 07:17 PM.
Here is a link of an editor apologizing for puting that chart in the paper because of what a joke it is
http://americanassembler.com/feature...e_averages.htm
again its the wrong election, try posting some info from 2004 instead of posting 4 year old sh-tOriginally Posted by HULK1732
Originally Posted by jcstomper
You still don't get it, do you? Imagine if they replayed last year's Super Bowl, only they put 2005 on it? Same concept. The numbers are exactly the same. Its the same hoax, just the put Kerry's name in place of Gore's.
I read the whole thing. At best he says it probably is bad info, but this is also one man's opinion based off his opinion. He didn't prove it wrong by factual information, nor did he do anymore than retract it because it got his newspaper a lot of heat. If this is inaccurate then I want to see IQ test results that prove that along with their sources, not some guys retraction because his boss got pissed at him for getting too much negative feedback for the paper.Originally Posted by HULK1732
Originally Posted by ECoastVIP
You still don't get it. The numbers you posted were fake, NOTHING backs them up. How about instead of us trying to prove what you have to say is false, you back up what you're saying. Think about it. I could say that I did your mom, and you couldn't prove me wrong. But I couldn't prove I actually did it either.
The sources are at the bottom of the chart. But info from the UK doesn't seem to be accepted as true. Those **** lying Brits right. What I have found says it's a legitimate IQ test. You can't even find something that says that, except the other tests that support what were posting, which you also deem as lying. What would actually convince you anyways? Probably only Bush showing up at your house and telling you.Originally Posted by UrbanLegend
Last edited by ECoastVIP; 11-14-2004 at 07:31 PM.
http://www.isteve.com/Web_Exclusives...115.6465670139
here we go, scroll down and read...updated for 2004
nice big hoax for ya
have a good night
Originally Posted by HULK1732
Happy now? Its all nice and updated for ya![]()
nope cause all that says is its a hoax, it doesnt show and facts to back up its claim. find the facts, and as for you wanting to prove our side its right at the bottom of the graphOriginally Posted by UrbanLegend
thank you
Originally Posted by jcstomper
Back up your claim first. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof. We'vfe shown why we think its a hoax. You have yet to show why its real, and not a hoax. I can make all kinds of claims and ask you to "prove me wrong." So prove to me that I am wearing shoes right now. Come on. Well, if you can't prove me wrong it must be true.....right?
Besides, both bodies of info are crap. Estimated IQ scores are about as reliable as the estimated attractiveness of a girl over the internet. See the thread on AM about purplelaceteddy.........
save teh pic and look at the bottom of it, it states the sources for the info. anyone can do itOriginally Posted by UrbanLegend
Their chart wouldn't work for me either.Originally Posted by jcstomper
probably cause they knew we would use it against them lolOriginally Posted by ECoastVIP
![]()
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)