whats going on guys. 26 years young, 5'11, 230lbs.
Little background, basically, I respond extremely well to test. First cycle ran 300 test, nothing else, with absolutely phenomenal results. That was 2 years ago. At the beggining of my current cycle, I was using 250 test cyp (a week) + a oral kickstart (h-drol) + GH. Also have had phenomenal results, gained 15 clean lean pounds while shedding a bit of fat, and have kept it all. Once the oral ended, I bumped up my cyp to 350, and continued on with the GH as well. (Im also using HCG 250 2x a week and A-dex as needed) .
As of now, I been using test @ 350 a week ever since then (with my gh). Many will say "the test is too low", but Im gaining at an extremely nice pace so I'm perfectly content. The less needed the better imo, could be synergy with the HGH that's really helping as well. I just happen to be an overall really good responder to test, go figure. My friend using the same stuff needs double of what I'm using to get similar results as me.
Well anyway, I have EQ, and was thinking of adding some in. I would like to lower the dose of test, as I'm prone to MPB. 250mg of test with my oral proved to be amazing as far as gains and libido went, and I of course bumped it to 350 to accommodate for the lack of the oral since then. Lately I been thinking of adding in EQ, which has less androgenic sides then test, and provides some additional lean muscle gains, and lowering my test back down to 300 or maybe even 250 again. This would provide less androgenic sides overall (saves me from the MPB), and the same if not better results overall as well with the addition of EQ in the mix now.
I know people don't like running EQ higher then test,but haven't seen a real reason for it yet other then people spewing out what they read from others. I'm really curious what people think of adding in EQ, and keeping test low, i.e. at 250-300 for libido/test base purposes.
thanks!
Reply With Quote