40/40/20 macro split is a generic number that you get from a generic bullshit formula of the nutrients your body requires. Just like the BMI, it's a generic formula. If you don't understand that, then I'll just leave it at that.
Let me just tell you this, I don't count my macros whatsoever but if I take a minute to think about what I eat and put together a rough number on grams that I get from each meal, I would measure out as follows..100-150g protein (depending on what I eat that day), approximately 300g carbs and I don't even bother counting my fat intake. I'm on a bulk like I usually am and I made a 15lb LEAN gain in 3 months and I would say 5lbs water weight on top of that. I maintained 10-12% body fat percentage as well. I rarely hit 150g of protein a day. So I don't need any luck to "get anywhere on that" because I already got there.
When I cut this summer for competition, I will be limiting carbs to the 60-80g range 6 weeks out and slowly decrease that as competiton gets closer till I eventually hit the the 10g mark 2 days out. Of course I will also limit fats. I've done it before and worked like a charm.
That all goes against what you are saying and it has been tried and proven. Call bullshit all you want. I don't get why you have to attack my methods just because they're different than yours. Like I said, everyone reacts different to their nutrient intake and I personally don't believe calories are the most efficient way to count energy. I don't count my calories and I feel great and energized every day so that is all that matters.
I don't personally know anybody that cuts at 200g of carbs and in all honesty, it doesn't make much sense to me. And that's coming from a guy that responds well to carbs. But if that's how you cut, then good luck to you
