I found about 7 peer reviewed studies on it. Here are two articles I found that you can look at. The 1997 article was the latest I found, but that is probably just a result of the search terms I used. Also, the references have around five other relevant articles, these two are the only ones that I still have open. Basically, performing cardio on an empty stomach will burn more fat than after a meal (these had carbs in meals, I don't know about just protein or p/f). However, the first study found that if the body is in calorie deficit, then longitudinaly the amount of fat lost was barely different between the two groups, regardless of fasting before or not. By barely, I think it would come out to something around 7 weeks to have a pound difference between the two groups. But then again, that adds up to an additional 5 lbs a year, assuming this rate stays constant.
"Effect of physical exercise on glycogen turnover and net substrate utilization according to the nutritional state."
Schneiter P, Di Vetta V, Jequier E, Tappy L. Am J Physiol. 1995 Dec;269(6 Pt 1):E1031-6.
"Lipolytic suppression following carbohydrate ingestion limits fat oxidation during exercise."
Horowitz JF, Mora-Rodriguez R, Byerley LO, Coyle EF.
Am J Physiol. 1997 Oct;273(4 Pt 1):E768-75
....and Jock191, don't start flaming some guy who is asking for feedback on a proposed idea. You tell the guy to do some research when all you did was completely copy and paste that entire post without even citing it? What a genius!
(
http://www.sportsinjurybulletin.com/...e-soreness.htm)