Results 1 to 40 of 56

Thread: Church posts video of Gay Exorcism; Outrage ensues

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Fort Worth
    Posts
    4,264

    Church posts video of Gay Exorcism; Outrage ensues

    Video at
    http://www.latimes.com/news/nationwo...,5852673.story

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s29tDh21GGg
    ===================================


    http://www.miamiherald.com/news/nati...y/1111874.html

    BRIDGEPORT, Conn. -- The video shows the 16-year-old boy lying on the floor, his body convulsing, as elders of a small Connecticut church cast a "homosexual demon" from his body.

    "Rip it from his throat!" a woman yells. "Come on, you homosexual demon! You homosexual spirit, we call you out right now! Loose your grip, Lucifer!"

    The 20-minute video posted on YouTube by Manifested Glory Ministries is being called abuse by gay and youth advocates, who are demanding an investigation. But a church official this week denied that the teenager was injured or that the church is prejudiced.

    "We believe a man should be with a woman and a woman should be with a man," the Rev. Patricia McKinney told The Associated Press. "We have nothing against homosexuals. I just don't agree with their lifestyle."

    The church posted the video on YouTube but has since removed it; it is still available on some Web sites that copied it. The church declined to make the video available for distribution by The Associated Press.
    It shows church members standing the youth on his feet by holding him under his arms, and people shouting as organ music plays.

    "Come out of his belly," someone commands. "It's in the belly - push."

    Later, the teenager is back on the floor, breathing heavily. Then he's coughing and apparently vomiting into a bag.

    "Get another bag," a participant says. "Make sure you have your gloves."

    As the youth lay back on the ground, limp, church members put a white sheet over him.

    It's nearly impossible to say how often similar exercises occur in churches nationwide. But Kamora Herrington, who runs a mentoring program at True Colors and has worked with the youth, said she believes it's fairly common.

    "This happens all the time," she said. "This is not isolated."

    Robin McHaelin, executive director of True Colors, an advocacy group for gay youths, said her organization is aware of five cases in recent years in which youths in her program were threatened with exorcism.

    In one case, she said, a child called to report that his caregiver had called a priest who was throwing holy water on his bedroom door.

    "I think it's horrifying," McHaelin said of the video by Manifested Glory. "What saddens me is the people that are doing this think they are doing something in the kid's best interests, when in fact they're murdering his spirit."

    McHaelin said she planned to report the situation to the Connecticut Department of Children and Families. An agency spokesman said the agency does not comment on complaints or investigations.

    "They have this kid in a full nelson," she said. "That just seems abusive to me."

    McKinney said the youth was 18. The boy confirmed he is 16 but otherwise declined to comment, citing the advice of his pastor.

    McHaelin said the boy told her staff that the church performed the ritual three times at his request. She said the boy has been engaging in risky behavior that she blames on the church's treatment.

    McKinney said the youth went to the church last year and collapsed on the floor during a service.

    "He was out of control in the church," she said. "This young man came to us. We didn't go to him."

    McKinney denied the ritual was an exorcism, describing it instead as a casting out of spirits. She said the church took care of the youth, providing him clothes.

    "He was dressing like a woman and everything. And he didn't want to be like that," McKinney said.

    The teen had been in reform school for stealing but was eager to get out and go to the church to have what he thought were his demons driven out, Herrington said.
    Exodus International, a Christian group that believes gays can become straight through prayer and counseling, does not advocate the church's approach, said Jeff Buchanan, director of church equipping.

    The Rev. Roland Stringfellow, a minister in Oakland, Calif., said he was subject to demon casting in the 1990s when he was at a Baptist church and was struggling with his sexuality. He said he was put in front of the church as members shouted "demon of homosexuality come out of him."

    "It caused nothing but shame and embarrassment," Stringfellow said.

    McKinney also has a weekly radio program. She talked on Wednesday's program about being "persecuted" in recent days but did not mention the video specifically.
    "It's been a hard time for me, but I'm looking good and I'm standing strong because when you have a mandate like mine you're not going to say what you want without the adversary coming after you," she said. "If you are a true prophet you're not going to be popular with the people."

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Deutschland
    Posts
    8,787


    I don't think medical science has figured out (or cares) what actually malfunctions to cause it, not sure its a "demon" or not though. ha
    ***No source checks!!!***

  3. #3
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Fort Worth
    Posts
    4,264
    Quote Originally Posted by muriloninja View Post


    I don't think medical science has figured out (or cares) what actually malfunctions to cause it
    I'm sure medical science has figured out it's not a "malfunction."

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Middle East
    Posts
    3,511
    Quote Originally Posted by Tock View Post
    I'm sure medical science has figured out it's not a "malfunction."
    Well Tock, you know my position on this as a libertarian, people can live however they want. However, by concluding that homosexuality is not a choice, and something you are born as, then you must take along with that the scientific rammifications. Anything deviating from the norm, is considered a diseased state, abnormality, malfunction, etc. I dont see anything wrong with this conclusion, other than it might not 'feel good,' or would be politically unpopular, but I am really a man of science, and could give two flying fu**s about political correctness and whether or not something hurts someones feelings. I have several gay friends, and dont view them any differently than my straight friends, nor do I find their lifestyle to be morally reprehensible. I have learned that nature provides many things which on the surface can appear to be a negative, and are actually a positive. For instance, the fact that many savonts and extremely intelligent people have a degree of Downs Syndrome. It is by definition a diseased state, although these people are capable of doing miraculous things. But please, do not try to misrepresent the scientific rammifcations of deciding that being gay is not a choice, just because it might not sound good, or hurt your feelings. It is what it is.

    "a disordered or incorrectly functioning organ, part, structure, or system of the body resulting from the effect of genetic or developmental errors, infection, poisons, nutritional deficiency or imbalance, toxicity, or unfavorable environmental factors; illness; sickness; ailment."

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    PA
    Posts
    30,963
    Quote Originally Posted by thegodfather View Post
    Well Tock, you know my position on this as a libertarian, people can live however they want. However, by concluding that homosexuality is not a choice, and something you are born as, then you must take along with that the scientific rammifications. Anything deviating from the norm, is considered a diseased state, abnormality, malfunction, etc. I dont see anything wrong with this conclusion, other than it might not 'feel good,' or would be politically unpopular, but I am really a man of science, and could give two flying fu**s about political correctness and whether or not something hurts someones feelings. I have several gay friends, and dont view them any differently than my straight friends, nor do I find their lifestyle to be morally reprehensible. I have learned that nature provides many things which on the surface can appear to be a negative, and are actually a positive. For instance, the fact that many savonts and extremely intelligent people have a degree of Downs Syndrome. It is by definition a diseased state, although these people are capable of doing miraculous things. But please, do not try to misrepresent the scientific rammifcations of deciding that being gay is not a choice, just because it might not sound good, or hurt your feelings. It is what it is.

    "a disordered or incorrectly functioning organ, part, structure, or system of the body resulting from the effect of genetic or developmental errors, infection, poisons, nutritional deficiency or imbalance, toxicity, or unfavorable environmental factors; illness; sickness; ailment."
    I stopped reading right there. Who decides what norm is ?

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Middle East
    Posts
    3,511
    Quote Originally Posted by DSM4Life View Post
    I stopped reading right there. Who decides what norm is ?
    Biologically/Physically speaking? Modern medicine...

    Remember that statement you made the next time you go into the ER in cardiac arrest ok. Or maybe if you are ever diagnosed with cancer, just tell the doc, who are you to determine that dysplasia and hyperplasia aren't normal?

  7. #7
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Fort Worth
    Posts
    4,264
    Quote Originally Posted by thegodfather View Post
    Well Tock, you know my position on this as a libertarian, people can live however they want. However, by concluding that homosexuality is not a choice, and something you are born as, then you must take along with that the scientific rammifications. Anything deviating from the norm, is considered a diseased state, abnormality, malfunction, etc. I dont see anything wrong with this conclusion, other than it might not 'feel good,' or would be politically unpopular, but I am really a man of science, and could give two flying fu**s about political correctness and whether or not something hurts someones feelings.
    Well, I'm sorry to learn that I'm somehow not as good as you.







    I have several gay friends, and dont view them any differently than my straight friends, nor do I find their lifestyle to be morally reprehensible. I have learned that nature provides many things which on the surface can appear to be a negative, and are actually a positive. For instance, the fact that many savonts and extremely intelligent people have a degree of Downs Syndrome. It is by definition a diseased state, although these people are capable of doing miraculous things. But please, do not try to misrepresent the scientific rammifcations of deciding that being gay is not a choice, just because it might not sound good, or hurt your feelings. It is what it is.
    But I'm deeply grateful that you are a nice enough fellow not to turn away from other people like me. It shows what a kind person you truly must be.




    "a disordered or incorrectly functioning organ, part, structure, or system of the body resulting from the effect of genetic or developmental errors, infection, poisons, nutritional deficiency or imbalance, toxicity, or unfavorable environmental factors; illness; sickness; ailment."

    Thank you for teaching me this lesson in human characteristics. Though I am better for this lesson, I can see that you are much better of a person than I because you are disease-free, functioning properly, and perfectly normal, which is something that I, a mere data point in the grand statistics of humanity, can only aspire to . . .

    It must be wonderful to be normal.
    Last edited by Tock; 07-02-2009 at 08:33 PM.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Middle East
    Posts
    3,511
    Quote Originally Posted by Tock View Post
    Well, I'm sorry to learn that I'm somehow not as good as you.


    But I'm deeply grateful that you are a nice enough fellow not to turn away from other people like me. It shows what a kind person you truly must be.




    Thank you for teaching me this lesson in human characteristics. Though I am better for this lesson, I can see that you are much better of a person than I because you are disease-free, functioning properly, and perfectly normal, which is something that I, a mere data point in the grand statistics of humanity, can only aspire to . . .

    It must be wonderful to be normal.
    Thats absurd Tock. You have put words into my argument which I never even said, not ONCE. When did I ever state I felt I was better than you, or anyone else for that matter?

    Is someone without cystic fibrosis better than someone with it? Is someone without cancer better than someone with it? Of course not, people in my mind, ought to be judged on their character, and not on groups that we classify them into. Regardless, if there is an argument that sexual orientation is biological/physiological, then I believe it would be classified as a diseased state since it differs from the norm, and under the current definition that I posted, it falls within that category. If you could stick to disputing those facts, instead of playing off of emotional ques or political correctness, I would greatly appreciate it. I would also appreciate if you'd refrain from putting words into my mouth or drawing wild assumptions about my intentions from my post.

    Do you believe having this viewpoint based on the facts makes me some sort of anti-gay nutjob? I certainly dont believe it should, as I treat every person as an individual and as my equal, with no regard to their preference for one sex over the other. I dont have to "hate gay people" to believe based on the facts and definitions at hand that it would be classified as a diseased state.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Posts
    3,435
    Quote Originally Posted by thegodfather View Post
    Well Tock, you know my position on this as a libertarian, people can live however they want. However, by concluding that homosexuality is not a choice, and something you are born as, then you must take along with that the scientific rammifications. Anything deviating from the norm, is considered a diseased state, abnormality, malfunction, etc. I dont see anything wrong with this conclusion, other than it might not 'feel good,' or would be politically unpopular, but I am really a man of science, and could give two flying fu**s about political correctness and whether or not something hurts someones feelings. I have several gay friends, and dont view them any differently than my straight friends, nor do I find their lifestyle to be morally reprehensible. I have learned that nature provides many things which on the surface can appear to be a negative, and are actually a positive. For instance, the fact that many savonts and extremely intelligent people have a degree of Downs Syndrome. It is by definition a diseased state, although these people are capable of doing miraculous things. But please, do not try to misrepresent the scientific rammifcations of deciding that being gay is not a choice, just because it might not sound good, or hurt your feelings. It is what it is.

    "a disordered or incorrectly functioning organ, part, structure, or system of the body resulting from the effect of genetic or developmental errors, infection, poisons, nutritional deficiency or imbalance, toxicity, or unfavorable environmental factors; illness; sickness; ailment."
    I believe most people in this thread are making the false assumption that the terms diseased state and abnormal are deragatory terms or that they are necessarily bigoted/hurtful designations. When, in fact, the opposite is true.

    With that said however, would it be proper to classify homosexuality as a diseased state or abnormal when vital physiological functions, namely reproduction, are not actually interepted? For example, the desire or need to sleep with the same sex does not prevent one from reproducing if the need arose. Indeed, the function still exists, but a hormonal imbalance simply sends a false signal and the sex organs proper functions are merely dormant albeit remaining.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Middle East
    Posts
    3,511
    Quote Originally Posted by Blome View Post
    I believe most people in this thread are making the false assumption that the terms diseased state and abnormal are deragatory terms or that they are necessarily bigoted/hurtful designations. When, in fact, the opposite is true.

    With that said however, would it be proper to classify homosexuality as a diseased state or abnormal when vital physiological functions, namely reproduction, are not actually interepted? For example, the desire or need to sleep with the same sex does not prevent one from reproducing if the need arose. Indeed, the function still exists, but a hormonal imbalance simply sends a false signal and the sex organs proper functions are merely dormant albeit remaining.
    People affected with Trisomy 21 (Downs Syndrome) are still able to reproduce, and have done so. The issue is not whether the vital physiological functions are present, but rather the cause of the sexual disposition. If, as DSM as stated, homosexuality is caused by a gene in the DNA of humans, then this would be a "diseased" gene, since it causes an orientation significantly contrary to the established norm. If it were instead just a matter of preference, it would not be much different than say, preferring to bang asians over caucasians, or liking whips and chains over normal sex.

    Using the definitions we have today, and the one I have posted, if there is a gay gene, then it could rightly and accurately be classified as a disease. It is just very politically unpopular to do such, however I dont think that science should start changing definitions and making exceptions, just because it might hurt some peoples feelings. If you claim that homosexuality is not a choice, and rather a trait caused by a gene, then you have to accept the additional rammifications of that.

    I dont see how that designation changes the plight of gay people in any possible way? I am still for full marriage rights and all other rights that every other human being enjoys in the United States. Just as I dont think people with cancer should be precluded from marrying, I dont think that gay people should be precluded either.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Land of the big timers
    Posts
    955
    dms what do you think about that? do you wanna give it a shot or are you happy where your at. lol.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    In the Gym, if i could
    Posts
    15,927
    Could be worse... he could be in pakistan

    http://quranbible.wordpress.com/2007...nced-to-death/

    They just go ahead and kill him..
    The answer to your every question

    Rules

    A bigot is a person obstinately or intolerantly devoted
    to his or her own opinions and prejudices, especially
    one exhibiting intolerance, and animosity toward those of differing beliefs.


    If you get scammed by an UGL listed on this board or by another member here, it's all part of the game and learning experience for you,
    we do not approve nor support any sources that may be listed on this site.
    I will not do source checks for you, the peer review from other members should be enough to help you make a decision on your quest. Buyer beware.
    Don't Let the Police kick your ass

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Posts
    3,435
    Haha, silly religion.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Strength and Honor
    Posts
    798
    oh well

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    PA
    Posts
    30,963
    Religion is a joke.

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Strength and Honor
    Posts
    798
    It not a joke as long as you believe and I mean you and not having someone spoon feed it to you. I wear a cross around my neck that my father wore In his army career 1935 till 1975 and he said as long as you believe you will never be alone.
    Last edited by Iron_Pig; 06-27-2009 at 05:16 PM. Reason: because

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    PA
    Posts
    30,963
    Quote Originally Posted by Iron_Pig View Post
    It not a joke as long as you believe and I mean you and not having someone spoon feed it to you. I wear a cross around my neck that my father wore In his army career 1935 till 1975 and he said as long as you believe you will never be alone.
    I can see the cross having meaning since your father gave it to you but for you to believe by having a cross your never going to die alone i think is amusing.

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Strength and Honor
    Posts
    798
    Quote Originally Posted by DSM4Life View Post
    I can see the cross having meaning since your father gave it to you but for you to believe by having a cross your never going to die alone i think is amusing.

    Why is it amusing ? I have seen death in many forms some by my own hand.When you have been a soilder as long as me you have the feeling you will die one day in some shit hole country alone My cross is my own personal conection to God. So I am never alone.

  19. #19
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    1,235
    Quote Originally Posted by DSM4Life View Post
    I can see the cross having meaning since your father gave it to you but for you to believe by having a cross your never going to die alone i think is amusing.
    he doesnt believe in eternal life because he wears a cross, he wears it because of what he believes.

  20. #20
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    13,966
    Quote Originally Posted by Blome View Post
    Haha, silly religion.
    Quote Originally Posted by DSM4Life View Post
    Religion is a joke.


    Yep, basically...

  21. #21
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    So Cali. Inland Empire
    Posts
    1,223
    Quote Originally Posted by DSM4Life View Post
    Religion is a joke.
    Religion = Anthropomorphism

  22. #22
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Beyond the Pale.
    Posts
    936
    Quote Originally Posted by Fat Guy View Post
    Religion = Anthropomorphism
    I don't see how you came to that conclusion.
    How does Religion = Anthropomorphism?

  23. #23
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    13,966
    Quote Originally Posted by Pocketbattleship2B View Post
    I don't see how you came to that conclusion.
    How does Religion = Anthropomorphism?
    Google the word and maybe it will make more sense.

  24. #24
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Beyond the Pale.
    Posts
    936
    Quote Originally Posted by xlxBigSexyxlx View Post
    Google the word and maybe it will make more sense.
    I knew about the meaning refering to animals being given human characteristics but just got a wider meaning off wikipedia.

  25. #25
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    San Francisco
    Posts
    82
    malfunction? really?

    So is jerking off a malfunction since it is not intended for normal procreation?

    gay-straight-bi-fatgirls-blondgirls-big boobs-litlle boobs-asian-etc it is all just sexual preference, no big deal.

    People used to think inter-racial relations were wrong also, but it is all just sex. Relax, it's normal.

  26. #26
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    324
    Quote Originally Posted by Dave-D View Post
    malfunction? really?

    So is jerking off a malfunction since it is not intended for normal procreation?

    gay-straight-bi-fatgirls-blondgirls-big boobs-litlle boobs-asian-etc it is all just sexual preference, no big deal.

    People used to think inter-racial relations were wrong also, but it is all just sex. Relax, it's normal.

    ill get dogs abuse for this . but i still think inter racial relationships are wrong . the thought of it turns my stomach . as for gay i dont think people really get a choice . though i think some choose this life style . its became trendy recently with people like robbie williams . one min he is next he aint . ffs make up your mind

  27. #27
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Middle East
    Posts
    3,511
    Quote Originally Posted by countrybhoy View Post
    ill get dogs abuse for this . but i still think inter racial relationships are wrong . the thought of it turns my stomach . as for gay i dont think people really get a choice . though i think some choose this life style . its became trendy recently with people like robbie williams . one min he is next he aint . ffs make up your mind
    Did you graduate high school? If so, how?

    Race is a socially constructed institution. It is a figment of human imagination. There is absolutely no basis for race within science and human DNA. If you believe race is real, you ought to believe the boogey-man is real, which from you severely uneducated viewpoints, just might be possible.

  28. #28
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Beyond the Pale.
    Posts
    936
    Quote Originally Posted by countrybhoy View Post
    ill get dogs abuse for this . but i still think inter racial relationships are wrong . the thought of it turns my stomach . as for gay i dont think people really get a choice . though i think some choose this life style . its became trendy recently with people like robbie williams . one min he is next he aint . ffs make up your mind

    Do YOU believe that,or is that what the people who tell you how to live your life ( you religious leader,your parents,the leaders of your town/city) tell you to believe?

  29. #29
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    San Francisco
    Posts
    82
    Quote Originally Posted by countrybhoy View Post
    ill get dogs abuse for this . but i still think inter racial relationships are wrong . the thought of it turns my stomach . as for gay i dont think people really get a choice . though i think some choose this life style . its became trendy recently with people like robbie williams . one min he is next he aint . ffs make up your mind
    What I am hearing is that it makes you physically ill to see people of two dif. races together.

    I just feel bad for you that you are so sensitive that you are upset by how others their lives and find happiness.

    I will keep it real with you though because I appreciate your honesty.
    I am a white man, I live in the city, and I would be uncomfortable if my daughter was in love with someone that looked different from me.

    But here is the thing, that is my problem not hers, and In the end I should be more concerned about things like, does that dude really care about her, does that guy have a job, is that guy a worthless POS? Better an honest, caring, upstanding, minority than a user, drug addicted, no job having, no education white trash f#$khead.

  30. #30
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    324
    well i know im white and if my daughter came in with anything but a white man thier relationship would not last long . . if god had wanted all the same color we would be the same color . . but hey you want to call me thick knock yourself out m8 . call me racist if you want . dont care .

  31. #31
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Front toward enemy
    Posts
    6,265
    Quote Originally Posted by countrybhoy View Post
    well i know im white and if my daughter came in with anything but a white man thier relationship would not last long . . if god had wanted all the same color we would be the same color . . but hey you want to call me thick knock yourself out m8 . call me racist if you want . dont care .

    EXCEPT God had nothing to do with the colour of races and it might interest you to know that Jesus WAS NOT white. Inter-relationships are good because sure at some point there will have been so much mixing that the human race will become ONE COLOUR. Seeing the state of the world today, thats a good thing to look forward to.

  32. #32
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Front toward enemy
    Posts
    6,265
    You know it pains me to hear people like you CountryBoy but at least your honest. My sister and brother in law are the same, saying their daughters will never date a black man when they are older. It's so beyond ignorant but what they don't realise is that if that is what their daughters will do they will be more resolute to do it. What's more important, your daughters happiness or your stupid pride?

  33. #33
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    13,966
    Quote Originally Posted by Flagg View Post
    EXCEPT God had nothing to do with the colour of races and it might interest you to know that Jesus WAS NOT white. Inter-relationships are good because sure at some point there will have been so much mixing that the human race will become ONE COLOUR. Seeing the state of the world today, thats a good thing to look forward to.
    Quote Originally Posted by Flagg View Post
    You know it pains me to hear people like you CountryBoy but at least your honest. My sister and brother in law are the same, saying their daughters will never date a black man when they are older. It's so beyond ignorant but what they don't realise is that if that is what their daughters will do they will be more resolute to do it. What's more important, your daughters happiness or your stupid pride?

    Bingo!

  34. #34
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    324
    Quote Originally Posted by Flagg View Post
    You know it pains me to hear people like you CountryBoy but at least your honest. My sister and brother in law are the same, saying their daughters will never date a black man when they are older. It's so beyond ignorant but what they don't realise is that if that is what their daughters will do they will be more resolute to do it. What's more important, your daughters happiness or your stupid pride?


    m8 not just black hell dont tar me with this i hate black people thing. any thing but white or wrong i just believe we should not mix races. oh and i know jesus was not white he was an jewish arab .one friend of mine is black. and on my wife side with arabs well half breeds the husband is an iraqi so i guess the kids are half iraqi .as for one color being a good thing i think you might find there are a few of us that dont agree thats why this world is a beautiful place so many different cultures why change it to one .

  35. #35
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    PA
    Posts
    30,963
    When i start looking at divorce rates and abandoned child from you so called "normal" people i tend to believe you are the defective one.

  36. #36
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Middle East
    Posts
    3,511
    Quote Originally Posted by DSM4Life View Post
    When i start looking at divorce rates and abandoned child from you so called "normal" people i tend to believe you are the defective one.
    I always get a good laugh when a politician talks about the "sanctity of marriage."

    Anyway, I see your point Tock. However, I dont believe anything I said was disparaging. I was arguing a definitional point, not in anyway attempting to make disparaging or hurtful remarks, as I view all people as individuals regardless of any number of collective factors that we try to use to group people now days. The point of the conversation was whether or not it would definitionally be classified as a disorder/disease if caused by a genetic trait.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •